Suppr超能文献

围产期死亡率审计与评估:过去、现在与未来之路

Perinatal mortality audits and reviews: Past, present and the way forward.

作者信息

Helps Aenne, Leitao Sara, Greene Richard, O'Donoghue Keelin

机构信息

Pregnancy Loss Research Group, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland; National Perinatal Epidemiology Centre (NPEC), University College Cork, Cork, Ireland; The Irish Centre for Maternal and Child Health Research (INFANT), University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.

Pregnancy Loss Research Group, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland; National Perinatal Epidemiology Centre (NPEC), University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Jul;250:24-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.04.054. Epub 2020 Apr 30.

Abstract

Perinatal deaths are devastating for families and staff involved. Failure to examine perinatal deaths for substandard care prevents learning and may lead to recurrence of events, as well as prolonged morbidity in bereaved families and hospital staff. Perinatal mortality reviews can identify factors contributing to suboptimal care. An integrative literature review was carried out to study the different types of perinatal mortality reviews currently being done internationally, establishing a comparison and examining promising new developments. We start by outlining issues with the classification of perinatal deaths and the different types of perinatal mortality reviews carried out in high-income countries. We reflect on the challenges that are encountered in the current processes and we then comment on how these may be overcome. Current literature shows that differences in classifications of perinatal deaths continue to impede important international comparisons. National perinatal mortality audits can provide reliable high-quality data to facilitate national and international benchmarking. Confidential enquiries give expert assessment on anonymised information to initiate system-wide improvements, but to provide local information on perinatal deaths unit-based multi-disciplinary team reviews are required. Additionally, there is a need to shift from a blame-culture to a focus on achieving best practice by learning from mistakes. Review tools and processes have been implemented in some countries to standardize perinatal mortality reviews, but there is still more work to be done. Involving the bereaved parents in the perinatal mortality review process is important and ways to achieve this are progressing. A structured approach to the perinatal mortality review process should be developed to facilitate sharing of experiences and challenges at national (or international) level. To achieve a reduction in the number of stillbirths and neonatal deaths, it is crucial to ensure that the perinatal mortality audit and review cycle is completed with implementation and re-evaluation of recommended changes in maternity services.

摘要

围产期死亡对相关家庭和工作人员来说是毁灭性的。未能对围产期死亡病例进行检查以发现不符合标准的护理情况,会阻碍经验教训的吸取,并可能导致类似事件再次发生,以及使失去亲人的家庭和医院工作人员长期处于痛苦之中。围产期死亡率审查能够识别导致护理不佳的因素。开展了一项综合文献综述,以研究目前国际上正在进行的不同类型的围产期死亡率审查,进行比较并审视有前景的新进展。我们首先概述围产期死亡分类方面的问题以及高收入国家开展的不同类型的围产期死亡率审查。我们思考当前流程中遇到的挑战,然后评论如何克服这些挑战。当前文献表明,围产期死亡分类的差异继续阻碍重要的国际比较。国家围产期死亡率审计能够提供可靠的高质量数据,以促进国家和国际层面的基准比较。保密调查对匿名信息进行专家评估,以启动全系统的改进,但要提供关于围产期死亡病例的本地信息,则需要基于单位的多学科团队审查。此外,有必要从责备文化转向通过从错误中学习来专注于实现最佳实践。一些国家已经实施了审查工具和流程,以使围产期死亡率审查标准化,但仍有更多工作要做。让失去亲人的父母参与围产期死亡率审查过程很重要,实现这一目标的方法也在不断推进。应该制定一种结构化的围产期死亡率审查流程方法,以促进在国家(或国际)层面分享经验和挑战。为了减少死产和新生儿死亡的数量,确保围产期死亡率审计和审查周期能够完成,并对产科服务的建议变更进行实施和重新评估至关重要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验