Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
Clinical and Organizational Ethics, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
J Med Ethics. 2021 Jan;47(1):51-58. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105758. Epub 2020 May 5.
The availability of willing providers of medical assistance in dying (MAiD) in Canada has been an issue since a Canadian Supreme Court decision and the subsequent passing of federal legislation, Bill C14, decriminalised MAiD in 2016. Following this legislation, Hamilton Health Sciences (HHS) in Ontario, Canada, created a team to support access to MAiD for patients. This research used a qualitative, mixed methods approach to data collection, obtaining the narratives of providers and supporters of MAiD practice at HHS. This study occurred at the outset of MAiD practice in 2016, and 1 year later, once MAiD practice was established. Our study reveals that professional identity and values, personal identity and values, experience with death and dying, and organisation context are the most significant contributors to conscientious participation for MAiD providers and supporters. The stories of study participants were used to create a model that provides a framework for values clarification around MAiD practice, and can be used to explore beliefs and reasoning around participation in MAiD across the moral spectrum. This research addresses a significant gap in the literature by advancing our understanding of factors that influence participation in taboo clinical practices. It may be applied practically to help promote reflective practice regarding complex and controversial areas of medicine, to improve interprofessional engagement in MAiD practice and promote the conditions necessary to support moral diversity in our institutions.
自加拿大最高法院的一项裁决以及随后通过的 2016 年联邦法案《C-14 法案》将医疗协助死亡(MAiD)合法化以来,加拿大愿意提供 MAiD 的提供者的可用性一直是一个问题。在此法规之后,加拿大安大略省汉密尔顿健康科学(HHS)成立了一个团队,为患者获得 MAiD 提供支持。这项研究采用了定性、混合方法的数据收集方法,收集了 HHS 中 MAiD 实践的提供者和支持者的叙述。本研究发生在 2016 年 MAiD 实践开始时,1 年后,即 MAiD 实践建立后。我们的研究表明,专业身份和价值观、个人身份和价值观、对死亡和濒死的经验以及组织背景是 MAiD 提供者和支持者自觉参与的最重要因素。研究参与者的故事被用来创建一个模型,为 MAiD 实践提供了一个价值观澄清的框架,并可用于探索道德范围内参与 MAiD 的信仰和推理。这项研究通过深入了解影响参与禁忌临床实践的因素,填补了文献中的一个重要空白。它可以实际应用于促进对医学中复杂和有争议领域的反思性实践,促进 MAiD 实践中的跨专业参与,并促进在我们的机构中支持道德多样性的条件。