J Neurosci Nurs. 2020 Aug;52(4):179-185. doi: 10.1097/JNN.0000000000000515.
A qualitative assessment of discharge resource needs is important for developing evidence-based care improvements in neurocritically ill patients.
We conducted a quality improvement initiative at an academic hospital and included all patients admitted to the neuroscience intensive care unit (ICU) during an 18-month period. Telephone assessments were made at 3 to 6 months after admission. Patients or caregivers were asked whether they had adequate resources upon discharge and whether they had any unanswered questions. The content of responses was reviewed by a neurointensivist and a neurocritical care nurse practitioner. A structured codebook was developed, organized into themes, and applied to the responses.
Sixty-one patients or caregivers responded regarding access to resources at discharge with 114 individual codable responses. Responses centered around 5 themes with 23 unique codes: satisfied, needs improvement, dissatisfied, poor post-ICU care, and poor health. The most frequently coded responses were that caregivers believed their loved one had experienced an unclear discharge (n = 11) or premature discharge (n = 12). Two hundred four patients or caregivers responded regarding unanswered questions or additional comments at follow-up, with 516 codable responses. These centered around 6 themes with 26 unique codes: positive experience, negative experience, neutral experience, medical questions, ongoing medical care or concern, or remembrance of time spent in the ICU. The most frequent response was that caregivers or patients stated that they received good care (n = 115). Multiple concerns were brought up, including lack of follow-up after hospitalization (n = 15) and dissatisfaction with post-ICU care (n = 15).
Obtaining qualitative responses after discharge provided insight into the transition from critical care. This could form the basis for an intervention to provide a smoother transition from the ICU to the outpatient setting.
对出院资源需求进行定性评估对于改善神经危重症患者的循证护理至关重要。
我们在一家学术医院开展了一项质量改进计划,纳入了在 18 个月期间入住神经科学重症监护病房(NICU)的所有患者。在出院后 3 至 6 个月进行电话评估。询问患者或护理人员出院时是否有足够的资源,以及是否有任何未解答的问题。神经科重症监护医生和神经危重症护理护士从业者对回答内容进行了审查。制定了一个结构化的编码手册,组织成主题,并应用于回答。
61 名患者或护理人员对出院时的资源获取情况做出了回应,共有 114 个可编码的回答。这些回答主要集中在 5 个主题上,有 23 个独特的代码:满意、需要改进、不满意、ICU 后护理差和健康状况差。最常编码的回答是护理人员认为他们所爱的人经历了出院时的情况不清楚(n = 11)或过早出院(n = 12)。204 名患者或护理人员对随访时的未解答问题或其他意见做出了回应,共有 516 个可编码的回答。这些回答主要集中在 6 个主题上,有 26 个独特的代码:正面体验、负面体验、中性体验、医疗问题、持续的医疗护理或关注、或对 ICU 时间的记忆。最常见的回答是护理人员或患者表示他们得到了很好的护理(n = 115)。提出了多个关注问题,包括住院后缺乏随访(n = 15)和对 ICU 后护理的不满(n = 15)。
在出院后获得定性反应提供了对从重症监护过渡的深入了解。这可以为提供从 ICU 到门诊环境更顺利过渡的干预措施提供基础。