• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

是否存在凭空而来的偏见?复制情绪对自动群体态度的影响。

Is there prejudice from thin air? Replicating the effect of emotion on automatic intergroup attitudes.

机构信息

Department of Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

BMC Psychol. 2020 May 6;8(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s40359-020-00414-4.

DOI:10.1186/s40359-020-00414-4
PMID:32375882
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7201959/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous studies showed that anger, rather than sadness, created automatic intergroup bias in a minimal group context.

METHODS

The current research reports a single study (N = 99) aiming to replicate this finding and further to test whether the intergroup bias manifests as ingroup favoritism, outgroup derogation, or both.

RESULTS

Our results failed to replicate the effect of anger on automatic bias. Intriguingly, participants across all emotion conditions exhibited high level of ingroup favoritism, but there was little evidence of outgroup derogation.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that, when there is no competition or conflict between groups, individuals, even in a bad emotional state such as anger, generally show ingroup love rather than outgroup hate.

摘要

背景

先前的研究表明,在最小群体情境中,愤怒而非悲伤会产生自动的群体间偏见。

方法

本研究报告了一项旨在复制这一发现的单一研究(N=99),并进一步测试群体间偏见是否表现为内群体偏好、外群体贬低,或两者兼有。

结果

我们的结果未能复制愤怒对自动偏见的影响。有趣的是,在所有情绪条件下的参与者都表现出了高度的内群体偏好,但几乎没有外群体贬低的证据。

结论

这些结果表明,当群体之间没有竞争或冲突时,即使个体处于愤怒等不良情绪状态,通常也会表现出对内群体的喜爱,而不是对外群体的仇恨。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38d2/7201959/b43a2ffa74ad/40359_2020_414_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38d2/7201959/1ae1c0501d10/40359_2020_414_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38d2/7201959/5ceec7d57d43/40359_2020_414_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38d2/7201959/b43a2ffa74ad/40359_2020_414_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38d2/7201959/1ae1c0501d10/40359_2020_414_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38d2/7201959/5ceec7d57d43/40359_2020_414_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38d2/7201959/b43a2ffa74ad/40359_2020_414_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Is there prejudice from thin air? Replicating the effect of emotion on automatic intergroup attitudes.是否存在凭空而来的偏见?复制情绪对自动群体态度的影响。
BMC Psychol. 2020 May 6;8(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s40359-020-00414-4.
2
Prejudice from thin air: The effect of emotion on automatic intergroup attitudes.无中生有的偏见:情绪对群体间自动态度的影响。
Psychol Sci. 2004 May;15(5):319-24. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00676.x.
3
Intergroup emotional exchange: Ingroup guilt and outgroup anger increase resource allocation in trust games.群体间情感交流:内群体内疚感和外群体愤怒感会增加信任游戏中的资源分配。
Emotion. 2019 Jun;19(4):605-616. doi: 10.1037/emo0000463. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
4
Existential threat and responses to emotional displays of ingroup and outgroup members.生存威胁以及对群体内和群体外成员情绪表露的反应。
Group Process Intergroup Relat. 2023 Dec;26(8):1866-1887. doi: 10.1177/13684302221128229. Epub 2022 Nov 5.
5
Contextual blending of ingroup/outgroup face stimuli and word valence: LPP modulation and convergence of measures.内群体/外群体面部刺激与词汇效价的情境融合:LPP调制与测量的收敛
BMC Neurosci. 2009 Jun 26;10:69. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-10-69.
6
Ingroup love, outgroup hate, and the gateway group effect: Comparing the direct and indirect impact of dual versus single identification.内群体之爱,外群体之恨,以及中介群体效应:比较双重认同与单一认同的直接和间接影响。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 16;18(8):e0287631. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287631. eCollection 2023.
7
Fanning the flames of prejudice: the influence of specific incidental emotions on implicit prejudice.煽动偏见之火:特定附带情绪对隐性偏见的影响。
Emotion. 2009 Aug;9(4):585-91. doi: 10.1037/a0015961.
8
Blurred boundaries between us and them: Do young children affiliate with outgroup members with shared preferences?我们与他们之间的界限变得模糊:年幼的孩子是否会与具有共同偏好的外群体成员结盟?
J Exp Child Psychol. 2021 Aug;208:105150. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105150. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
9
Emotions in Intergroup Contact: Incidental and Integral Emotions' Effects on Interethnic Bias Are Moderated by Emotion Applicability and Subjective Agency.群体间接触中的情绪:附带情绪和整合情绪对族裔间偏见的影响受情绪适用性和主观能动性的调节。
Front Psychol. 2021 May 28;12:588944. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.588944. eCollection 2021.
10
Visualizing minimal ingroup and outgroup faces: implications for impressions, attitudes, and behavior.可视化最小内群体和外群体面孔:对印象、态度和行为的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2014 Jun;106(6):897-911. doi: 10.1037/a0036498.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychosocial Problems among Psychiatric Nurses for Caring Patients with Mental Disorders during the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间精神科护士护理精神障碍患者时面临的心理社会问题
Nurs Res Pract. 2023 Jun 24;2023:3689759. doi: 10.1155/2023/3689759. eCollection 2023.
2
Decoupling the Conflicting Evaluative Meanings in Automatically Activated Race-Based Associations.自动激活的基于种族的联想中冲突的评价意义的解耦。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2024 Jul;50(7):987-1005. doi: 10.1177/01461672231156029. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
3
When Teamwork Works: Examining the Relationship Between Leader-Member Exchange Differentiation and Team Creativity.

本文引用的文献

1
The manipulation of affect: A meta-analysis of affect induction procedures.情感操控:情感诱导程序的荟萃分析。
Psychol Bull. 2020 Apr;146(4):355-375. doi: 10.1037/bul0000224. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
2
Four reasons to prefer Bayesian analyses over significance testing.四个偏爱贝叶斯分析而非显著性检验的理由。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Feb;25(1):207-218. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1266-z.
3
PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.心理学. 心理科学可重复性的评估.
团队协作发挥作用时:探究领导-成员交换差异化与团队创造力之间的关系。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 21;12:646514. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.646514. eCollection 2021.
4
Null results for the steal-framing effect on out-group aggression.在对外群体攻击上没有发现劫持框架效应的结果。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 13;12(1):686. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-04729-z.
5
Affective Saturation Index: A Lexical Measure of Affect.情感饱和度指数:一种情感的词汇测量方法。
Entropy (Basel). 2021 Oct 28;23(11):1421. doi: 10.3390/e23111421.
Science. 2015 Aug 28;349(6251):aac4716. doi: 10.1126/science.aac4716.
4
Intergroup anxiety effects on implicit racial evaluation and stereotyping.群体间焦虑对内隐种族评价和刻板印象的影响。
Emotion. 2012 Dec;12(6):1273-80. doi: 10.1037/a0029016. Epub 2012 Jul 9.
5
Discrete emotions predict changes in cognition, judgment, experience, behavior, and physiology: a meta-analysis of experimental emotion elicitations.离散情绪可预测认知、判断、体验、行为和生理的变化:实验诱发情绪的荟萃分析。
Psychol Bull. 2011 Sep;137(5):834-55. doi: 10.1037/a0024244.
6
Fanning the flames of prejudice: the influence of specific incidental emotions on implicit prejudice.煽动偏见之火:特定附带情绪对隐性偏见的影响。
Emotion. 2009 Aug;9(4):585-91. doi: 10.1037/a0015961.
7
"In-group love" and "out-group hate" as motives for individual participation in intergroup conflict: a new game paradigm.作为个体参与群体间冲突动机的“内群体喜爱”与“外群体仇恨”:一种新的博弈范式
Psychol Sci. 2008 Apr;19(4):405-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02100.x.
8
The importance of being we: human nature and intergroup relations.“我们”存在的重要性:人性与群体间关系
Am Psychol. 2007 Nov;62(8):726-38. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.62.8.728.
9
Separating multiple processes in implicit social cognition: the quad model of implicit task performance.区分内隐社会认知中的多个过程:内隐任务表现的四重模型
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Oct;89(4):469-87. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.469.
10
Psychology: red enhances human performance in contests.心理学:红色可提高人类在竞赛中的表现。
Nature. 2005 May 19;435(7040):293. doi: 10.1038/435293a.