• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医患双方对医疗互动中沟通情况评估的一致性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析的评价者间一致性研究。

Agreement of physician and patient ratings of communication in medical encounters: A systematic review and meta-analysis of interrater agreement.

机构信息

Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

Division of General Practice/Family Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Oct;103(10):1873-1882. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.04.002. Epub 2020 Apr 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2020.04.002
PMID:32376141
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the agreement of physician and patient ratings of communication in medical face-to-face consultations.

METHODS

A systematic search of twelve databases was conducted. Studies investigating agreement between physician and patient ratings of communication in medical face-to-face encounters and reporting interrater agreement were included. Methodological quality was assessed, and study characteristics and physician-patient agreement were narratively summarized. Meta-analysis was conducted for a subsample of the included studies investigating shared decision making.

RESULTS

Of the 17 included studies, ten studies did not demonstrate any correspondence between physician and patient ratings. The remaining seven studies revealed poor to fair absolute agreement (κ between .13 and .42; κ between .31 and .49; 95% CI 0.13 - 0.76) and poor to moderate consistency (r = .17 and .06; r between .39 and .63; p < .05). Meta-analysis of six studies yielded small association (r = .15).

CONCLUSION

Physicians and patients evaluate communication differently and at best, only slightly agree in their ratings, indicating that the construct of communication is not measurable in a stable manner.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Decision makers and researchers should be aware that they assess different aspects of communication, depending on the perspective examined. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42019120065.

摘要

目的

确定医患在面对面医疗咨询中沟通评估的一致性。

方法

对 12 个数据库进行了系统检索。纳入了调查医患在面对面医患互动中沟通评估一致性并报告评价者间一致性的研究。评估了研究方法的质量,并对研究特征和医患一致性进行了叙述性总结。对纳入研究中关于共同决策的亚组进行了荟萃分析。

结果

在纳入的 17 项研究中,有 10 项研究未显示出医生和患者评分之间的任何对应关系。其余 7 项研究显示出较差到适度的绝对一致性(κ 在.13 到.42 之间;κ 在.31 到.49 之间;95%CI 0.13-0.76)和较差到适度的一致性(r =.17 和.06;r 在.39 和.63 之间;p<.05)。对 6 项研究的荟萃分析得出了较小的关联(r =.15)。

结论

医生和患者对沟通的评估方式不同,而且最多只有轻微的一致性,这表明沟通的结构无法以稳定的方式进行测量。

实践意义

决策者和研究人员应该意识到,他们根据所考察的角度评估沟通的不同方面。PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42019120065。

相似文献

1
Agreement of physician and patient ratings of communication in medical encounters: A systematic review and meta-analysis of interrater agreement.医患双方对医疗互动中沟通情况评估的一致性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析的评价者间一致性研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Oct;103(10):1873-1882. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.04.002. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
2
Pitfalls in the statistical examination and interpretation of the correspondence between physician and patient satisfaction ratings and their relevance for shared decision making research.医生和患者满意度评分之间的一致性的统计检验和解释中的陷阱及其对共同决策研究的相关性。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 May 18;11:71. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-71.
3
Association of Actual and Preferred Decision Roles With Patient-Reported Quality of Care: Shared Decision Making in Cancer Care.实际和期望的决策角色与患者报告的护理质量的关联:癌症护理中的共同决策。
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Apr;1(1):50-8. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2014.112.
4
Congruence of Patient Self-Rating of Health with Family Physician Ratings.患者自我健康评分与家庭医生评分的一致性。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2017 Mar-Apr;30(2):196-204. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2017.02.160243.
5
Variance components of ratings of physician-patient communication: A generalizability theory analysis.医生与患者沟通评估的方差分量:概化理论分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 10;16(6):e0252968. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252968. eCollection 2021.
6
Communication practices that encourage and constrain shared decision making in health-care encounters: Systematic review of conversation analytic research.促进和限制医疗保健互动中共同决策的沟通实践:对话分析研究的系统评价。
Health Expect. 2017 Dec;20(6):1228-1247. doi: 10.1111/hex.12557. Epub 2017 May 18.
7
The Effect of Screen-to-Screen Versus Face-to-Face Consultation on Doctor-Patient Communication: An Experimental Study with Simulated Patients.屏幕对屏幕咨询与面对面咨询对医患沟通的影响:一项针对模拟患者的实验研究
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Dec 20;19(12):e421. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8033.
8
Patient and observer ratings of physician shared decision making behaviors in breast cancer consultations.患者和观察者对乳腺癌咨询中医生共享决策行为的评价。
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Jul;88(1):93-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.01.008. Epub 2012 Feb 10.
9
Confusion in and about shared decision making in hospital outpatient encounters.医院门诊会诊中共同决策的内在及外在困惑。
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Sep;96(3):287-94. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.07.012. Epub 2014 Jul 19.
10
What is a medical decision? A taxonomy based on physician statements in hospital encounters: a qualitative study.什么是医疗决策?基于医院就诊中医师陈述的分类法:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Feb 11;6(2):e010098. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010098.

引用本文的文献

1
Physician-patient agreement on physicians' communication skills and visit satisfaction in dermatology clinics: a one-with-many design.皮肤科诊所中医生与患者就医生沟通技巧和就诊满意度达成的共识:一种一对多设计。
Health Psychol Rep. 2021 Nov 10;10(1):68-81. doi: 10.5114/hpr.2021.110574. eCollection 2022.
2
Application of the skills network approach to measure physician competence in shared decision making based on self-assessment.基于自我评估的技能网络方法在衡量医生共同决策能力中的应用。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 27;18(2):e0282283. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282283. eCollection 2023.
3
Midwives' empathy and shared decision making from women's perspective - sensitivity of an assessment to compare quality of care in prenatal and obstetric care.
从女性视角看助产士的同理心和共同决策 - 评估敏感性,以比较产前和产科护理的护理质量。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Sep 20;22(1):717. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-05041-y.
4
Patient-Reported Quality of Communication Skills in the Clinical Workplace for Clinicians Learning Medical Spanish.临床工作场所中学习医学西班牙语的临床医生的患者报告沟通技能质量
Cureus. 2022 Feb 15;14(2):e22222. doi: 10.7759/cureus.22222. eCollection 2022 Feb.
5
A co-design study to develop supportive interventions to improve psychological and social adaptation among adults with new-onset type 1 diabetes in Denmark and the UK.丹麦和英国的一项共同设计研究,旨在开发支持性干预措施,以改善新发 1 型糖尿病成人的心理和社会适应能力。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 2;11(11):e051430. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051430.
6
Patient Perspectives on Medical Trauma Related to Inflammatory Bowel Disease.患者对炎症性肠病相关医疗创伤的看法。
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2022 Sep;29(3):596-607. doi: 10.1007/s10880-021-09805-0. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
7
Variance components of ratings of physician-patient communication: A generalizability theory analysis.医生与患者沟通评估的方差分量:概化理论分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 10;16(6):e0252968. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252968. eCollection 2021.
8
Improving communication between healthcare providers and pulmonary arterial hypertension patients: a survey of patient preferences.改善医疗服务提供者与肺动脉高压患者之间的沟通:患者偏好调查
Pulm Circ. 2021 May 21;11(2):20458940211015813. doi: 10.1177/20458940211015813. eCollection 2021 Apr-Jun.
9
Exploring how differently patients and clinical tutors see the same consultation: building evidence for inclusion of real patient feedback in medical education.探索患者和临床导师对同一会诊的看法有何不同:为将真实患者反馈纳入医学教育提供证据。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Apr 29;21(1):246. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02654-3.
10
Modes of Interaction in Naturally Occurring Medical Encounters With General Practitioners: The "One in a Million" Study.与全科医生进行自然发生的医疗接触中的互动模式:“百万分之一”研究。
Qual Health Res. 2021 May;31(6):1129-1143. doi: 10.1177/1049732321993790. Epub 2021 Mar 4.