Suppr超能文献

临床研究表明,电磁肌肉刺激不会对脂肪细胞造成损伤。

Clinical Study Demonstrates that Electromagnetic Muscle Stimulation Does Not Cause Injury to Fat Cells.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, California, 92697.

Private Practice Surgical and Non-Surgical Cosmetic Plastic Surgery, Dallas, Texas, 75225.

出版信息

Lasers Surg Med. 2021 Jan;53(1):70-78. doi: 10.1002/lsm.23259. Epub 2020 May 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

A previous pre-clinical study on electromagnetic muscle stimulation (EMMS) suggested that fat cell apoptosis occurs following treatment in a porcine model. While EMMS can induce changes in muscle, the effect on fat tissue is not established. This clinical study sought to assess adipose tissue response to EMMS in comparison to cryolipolysis treatment.

STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: Study subjects were recruited prior to abdominoplasty to receive body contouring treatments and subsequently to obtain tissue for histological analysis. Non-invasive abdominal treatments were delivered using a commercially available (n = 6) or prototype (n = 3) EMMS system or a cryolipolysis system (n = 2). Subjects received a single EMMS treatment (100% intensity for 30 minutes) or a single cryolipolysis treatment (-11°C for 35 minutes) to the abdomen. Superficial and deep (i.e., adjacent to muscle layer) subcutaneous adipose tissue was harvested at set timepoints post-treatment. The presence or absence of an inflammatory response was evaluated using standard hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. As adipocytes that are destined to become apoptotic cannot be distinguished by traditional H&E staining during the early phases of injury, irreversible fat cell injury was assessed using perilipin immunofluorescence.

RESULTS

Following H&E histological analysis at 3, 10, 11, and 17 days post-treatment, no EMMS-treated samples showed an inflammatory response in either the superficial or deep subcutaneous adipose tissue. For the cryolipolysis-treated adipose tissue, however, the H&E staining revealed a marked inflammatory response with an influx of neutrophils, lymphocytes, and macrophages at timepoints consistent with previous histological studies. Further, loss of perilipin staining provided clear visual evidence of irreversible fat cell injury in the cryolipolysis-treated adipose tissue. In contrast, the electromagnetic muscle stimulation-treated samples showed persistence of perilipin staining of adipose tissue indicating that all fat cells were viable.

CONCLUSION

This study failed to demonstrate either fat cell injury or inflammatory response following EMMS treatment. While electromagnetic muscle stimulation may non-invasively induce muscle changes, this clinical study found no evidence of an impact injurious or otherwise on subcutaneous fat. © 2020 The Authors. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

摘要

背景与目的

先前关于电磁肌肉刺激(EMMS)的临床前研究表明,在猪模型中治疗后会发生脂肪细胞凋亡。虽然 EMMS 可以引起肌肉变化,但对脂肪组织的影响尚未确定。本临床研究旨在评估 EMMS 对脂肪组织的影响,并与冷冻脂肪分解治疗进行比较。

研究设计/材料和方法: 在接受腹部整形术之前,研究对象被招募接受身体轮廓治疗,随后获得组织进行组织学分析。使用市售(n=6)或原型(n=3)EMMS 系统或冷冻脂肪分解系统(n=2)对非侵入性腹部进行治疗。研究对象接受单次 EMMS 治疗(强度为 100%,持续 30 分钟)或单次冷冻脂肪分解治疗(-11°C 持续 35 分钟)。在治疗后设定的时间点采集浅层和深层(即紧邻肌肉层)皮下脂肪组织。使用标准苏木精和伊红(H&E)染色评估是否存在炎症反应。由于在损伤的早期阶段,无法通过传统的 H&E 染色区分注定要凋亡的脂肪细胞,因此使用 perilipin 免疫荧光评估不可逆的脂肪细胞损伤。

结果

在治疗后 3、10、11 和 17 天进行 H&E 组织学分析后,未发现 EMMS 治疗的样本在浅层或深层皮下脂肪组织中出现炎症反应。然而,对于冷冻脂肪分解治疗的脂肪组织,H&E 染色显示出明显的炎症反应,在与先前的组织学研究一致的时间点有中性粒细胞、淋巴细胞和巨噬细胞的浸润。此外,perilipin 染色的丧失提供了冷冻脂肪分解治疗的脂肪组织中不可逆的脂肪细胞损伤的清晰视觉证据。相比之下,电磁肌肉刺激治疗的样本显示出脂肪组织中 perilipin 染色的持续存在,表明所有脂肪细胞均存活。

结论

本研究未能证明 EMMS 治疗后脂肪细胞损伤或炎症反应。虽然电磁肌肉刺激可以非侵入性地引起肌肉变化,但本临床研究没有发现对皮下脂肪产生有害或其他影响的证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/903a/7891655/13773945a2f4/LSM-53-70-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验