• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证非大学生家长纳入问卷索引。

Validation of the Index for Inclusion Questionnaire for Parents of Non-University Education Students.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Hum-878 Research Team, Health Research Centre, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain.

Department of Education, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 6;17(9):3216. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093216.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17093216
PMID:32384615
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7246626/
Abstract

The perspective from the parents of non-university students is essential in determining inclusive education in a school. The Index of Inclusion is one of the most widely used self-assessment tools and strategies to help teaching teams self-assess their political cultures and practices from the perspective of the values and principles of educational inclusion worldwide. For this reason, the present study intends to show evidence of validity of the Index for Inclusion questionnaire for parents of non-university education students, in a quantitative way, through a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). In this study, 108 fathers and 500 mothers took part, aged between 21 and 62 years ( = 43.59; = 6.64), whose children belonged to educational institutions throughout Spain. The results revealed adequate adjustment rates, showing invariant structure with respect to sex. The Index for Inclusion for families of non-university education students was shown to be a robust and adequate psychometric instrument to assess the degree of development of inclusive education in educational institutions from the perspective of the parents of said student body. The family is a basic pillar in the education of children and a reference for them. In addition, parents of non-university education students are configured as fundamental participatory elements of the child's educational institution thus; making the family a fundamental element that favors inclusive education. Precisely because of all this, the future administration of this questionnaire (to the parents of these students) is recommended.

摘要

从非大学生家长的角度来看,确定学校的包容性教育至关重要。包容指数是最广泛使用的自我评估工具和策略之一,可帮助教学团队从全球教育包容的价值观和原则的角度评估其政治文化和实践。出于这个原因,本研究旨在通过验证性因素分析(CFA)以定量方式证明非大学生家长包容指数问卷的有效性。在这项研究中,有 108 位父亲和 500 位母亲参加,年龄在 21 到 62 岁之间(=43.59;=6.64),他们的孩子来自西班牙各地的教育机构。结果显示出适当的调整率,表明在性别方面具有不变的结构。非大学生家长包容指数被证明是一种可靠且适当的心理计量学工具,可从上述学生群体的家长的角度评估教育机构中包容性教育的发展程度。家庭是儿童教育的基本支柱,也是他们的参考。此外,非大学生家长是孩子教育机构的重要参与元素;因此,家庭是促进包容性教育的基本要素。正因为如此,建议未来对这些学生的家长进行此问卷的管理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba54/7246626/14b3572ea8ed/ijerph-17-03216-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba54/7246626/d6c3c315dd60/ijerph-17-03216-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba54/7246626/14b3572ea8ed/ijerph-17-03216-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba54/7246626/d6c3c315dd60/ijerph-17-03216-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba54/7246626/14b3572ea8ed/ijerph-17-03216-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of the Index for Inclusion Questionnaire for Parents of Non-University Education Students.验证非大学生家长纳入问卷索引。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 6;17(9):3216. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093216.
2
The educational and psychosocial needs of students with additional provisions during COVID-19 in Greece: Parents' perspectives against schools' crisis management.希腊新冠疫情期间有特殊需求学生的教育和心理社会需求:家长对学校危机管理的看法
Res Dev Disabil. 2023 Dec;143:104638. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2023.104638. Epub 2023 Nov 22.
3
Short report: Parents' perspectives on inclusive schools for students with disabilities in Saudi Arabia.简短报告:沙特阿拉伯家长对残疾学生融合学校的看法。
Res Dev Disabil. 2024 Aug;151:104786. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104786. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
4
[Comparing students in inclusive education to those in special schools: the view of parents of children with learning disabilities].[将融合教育中的学生与特殊学校的学生进行比较:学习障碍儿童家长的看法]
Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr. 2004 Dec;53(10):685-706.
5
Protocol for a prospective longitudinal study investigating the participation and educational trajectories of Australian students with autism.一项关于澳大利亚自闭症学生参与情况和教育轨迹的前瞻性纵向研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 23;8(1):e017082. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017082.
6
Parental perspectives on inclusion: effects of autism and Down syndrome.家长对融合教育的看法:自闭症和唐氏综合征的影响
J Autism Dev Disord. 1999 Aug;29(4):297-305. doi: 10.1023/a:1022159302571.
7
Development and psychometric validation of the 'Parent Perspective University of Rhode Island Change Assessment-Short' (PURICA-S) Questionnaire for the application in parents of children with overweight and obesity.“罗德岛大学家长视角变化评估简表”(PURICA-S)问卷的开发及其心理测量学验证,用于超重和肥胖儿童的家长。
BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 17;6(11):e012711. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012711.
8
Social inclusion of students with special educational needs assessed by the Inclusion of Other in the Self scale.社会包容:用“自我中的他人包容度量表”评估有特殊教育需要的学生。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 28;16(4):e0250070. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250070. eCollection 2021.
9
Parental Attitudes Towards Inclusiveness Instrument (PATII): Psychometric evaluation of a new instrument measuring parental beliefs about gender and sexuality diversity inclusions in schools.父母对包容性态度量表(PATII):一种新工具的心理计量学评估,用于衡量父母对学校中性别和性多样性包容的信念。
J Sch Psychol. 2021 Jun;86:222-242. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2021.02.008. Epub 2021 May 18.
10
Parental assessment of physical education in the school curriculum: A brief report on the influence of past experiences as students.家长对学校课程中体育教育的评估:过去作为学生经历影响的简要报告。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 10;14(7):e0219544. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219544. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Perception of Inclusion in School Education and Physical Activity Among Polish Students.新冠疫情对波兰学生在校教育中包容感认知及体育活动的影响。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 26;13:880791. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.880791. eCollection 2022.
2
An Inclusive View of the Disability of Secondary School Students.中学生残疾的包容性观点。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 30;17(23):8922. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17238922.

本文引用的文献

1
Parenting Styles, Internalization of Values and Self-Esteem: A Cross-Cultural Study in Spain, Portugal and Brazil.教养方式、价值观内化与自尊:西班牙、葡萄牙和巴西的跨文化研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 31;17(7):2370. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072370.
2
The Normal-Theory and Asymptotic Distribution-Free (ADF) Covariance Matrix of Standardized Regression Coefficients: Theoretical Extensions and Finite Sample Behavior.标准化回归系数的正态理论和渐近分布自由(ADF)协方差矩阵:理论扩展与有限样本行为
Psychometrika. 2015 Jun;80(2):365-78. doi: 10.1007/s11336-013-9380-y. Epub 2013 Dec 21.
3
The multidimensional structure of physical fitness: invariance over gender and age.
体能的多维结构:性别和年龄上的不变性。
Res Q Exerc Sport. 1993 Sep;64(3):256-73. doi: 10.1080/02701367.1993.10608810.