• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脉冲频率依赖性 10 周全身肌电刺激训练方案对特定运动表现参数的影响。

Effects of an Impulse Frequency Dependent 10-Week Whole-body Electromyostimulation Training Program on Specific Sport Performance Parameters.

机构信息

Department of Sports Science, Technische Universität Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany.

Institute of Medical Physics, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.

出版信息

J Sports Sci Med. 2020 May 1;19(2):271-281. eCollection 2020 Jun.

PMID:32390720
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7196755/
Abstract

The difference in the efficacy of altered stimulation parameters in whole-body-electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) training remains largely unexplored. However, higher impulse frequencies (>50 Hz) might be most adequate for strength gain. The aim of this study was to analyze potential differences in sports-related performance parameters after a 10-week WB-EMS training with different frequencies. A total of 51 untrained participants (24.9 ± 3.9 years, 174 ± 9 cm, 72.4 ± 16.4 kg, BMI 23.8 ± 4.1, body fat 24.7 ± 8.1 %) was randomly divided into three groups: one inactive control group (CON) and two training groups. They completed a 10-week WB-EMS program of 1.5 sessions/week, equal content but different stimulation frequencies (training with 20 Hz (T20) vs. training with 85 Hz (T85)). Before and after intervention, all participants completed jumping (Counter Movement Jump (CMJ), Squat Jump (SJ), Drop Jump (DJ)), sprinting (5m, 10m, 30m), and strength tests (isometric trunk flexion/extension). One-way ANOVA was applied to calculate parameter changes. Post-hoc least significant difference tests were performed to identify group differences. Significant differences were identified for CMJ (p = 0.007), SJ (p = 0.022), trunk flexion (p = 0.020) and extension (p=.013) with significant group differences between both training groups and CON (not between the two training groups T20 and T85). A 10-week WB-EMS training leads to significant improvements of jump and strength parameters in untrained participants. No differences could be detected between the frequencies. Therefore, both stimulation frequencies can be regarded as adequate for increasing specific sport performance parameters. Further aspects as regeneration or long term effects by the use of different frequencies still need to be clarified.

摘要

全身肌电刺激(WB-EMS)训练中改变刺激参数的效果差异在很大程度上仍未得到探索。然而,较高的脉冲频率(>50 Hz)可能更适合增强力量。本研究旨在分析不同频率的 10 周 WB-EMS 训练后与运动相关的表现参数的潜在差异。共有 51 名未经训练的参与者(24.9 ± 3.9 岁,174 ± 9cm,72.4 ± 16.4kg,BMI 23.8 ± 4.1,体脂 24.7 ± 8.1%)被随机分为三组:一个不活动对照组(CON)和两个训练组。他们完成了 10 周的 WB-EMS 计划,每周 1.5 次,内容相同但刺激频率不同(20 Hz 训练(T20)与 85 Hz 训练(T85))。干预前后,所有参与者都完成了跳跃(反弹性跳跃(CMJ)、深蹲跳跃(SJ)、跳落跳跃(DJ))、短跑(5m、10m、30m)和力量测试(等长躯干屈伸)。应用单向方差分析计算参数变化。进行最小显著差异事后检验以确定组间差异。CMJ(p = 0.007)、SJ(p = 0.022)、躯干屈伸(p = 0.020)和伸展(p =.013)有显著差异,两个训练组和 CON 之间存在显著组间差异(两个训练组 T20 和 T85 之间无差异)。10 周的 WB-EMS 训练可使未经训练的参与者的跳跃和力量参数显著提高。两种频率之间没有差异。因此,两种刺激频率都可以被认为是增加特定运动表现参数的有效手段。不同频率对再生或长期效果的进一步影响仍需进一步阐明。

相似文献

1
Effects of an Impulse Frequency Dependent 10-Week Whole-body Electromyostimulation Training Program on Specific Sport Performance Parameters.脉冲频率依赖性 10 周全身肌电刺激训练方案对特定运动表现参数的影响。
J Sports Sci Med. 2020 May 1;19(2):271-281. eCollection 2020 Jun.
2
Electromyostimulation--a systematic review of the influence of training regimens and stimulation parameters on effectiveness in electromyostimulation training of selected strength parameters.肌电刺激——训练方案和刺激参数对肌电刺激训练选定强度参数效果影响的系统评价。
J Strength Cond Res. 2011 Nov;25(11):3218-38. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318212e3ce.
3
Effects of combined electromyostimulation and gymnastics training in prepubertal girls.青春期前女孩的肌电刺激与体操训练相结合的效果。
J Strength Cond Res. 2011 Feb;25(2):520-6. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181bac451.
4
Effects of Four Weeks of Static vs. Dynamic Bodyweight Exercises with Whole-Body Electromyostimulation on Jump and Strength Performance: A Two-Armed, Randomized, Controlled Trial.四周静态与动态自身体重训练结合全身肌电刺激对跳跃和力量表现的影响:一项双臂、随机、对照试验。
J Sports Sci Med. 2023 Jun 1;22(2):226-234. doi: 10.52082/jssm.2023.226. eCollection 2023 Jun.
5
Can A Superimposed Whole-Body Electromyostimulation Intervention Enhance the Effects of a 10-Week Athletic Strength Training in Youth Elite Soccer Players?全身叠加肌电刺激干预能否增强青少年精英足球运动员 10 周体能训练的效果?
J Sports Sci Med. 2020 Aug 13;19(3):535-546. eCollection 2020 Sep.
6
Electromyostimulation and plyometric training effects on jumping and sprint time.肌电刺激和增强式训练对跳跃及冲刺时间的影响。
Int J Sports Med. 2006 Jul;27(7):533-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-865845.
7
The Impact of Whole-Body Electromyostimulation on Body Posture and Trunk Muscle Strength in Untrained Persons.全身肌电刺激对未经训练者身体姿势和躯干肌肉力量的影响。
Front Physiol. 2019 Aug 20;10:1020. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01020. eCollection 2019.
8
The role of attentional focus in plyometric training.注意力焦点在增强式训练中的作用。
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2012 Jun;52(3):319-27.
9
Effects of In-Season Short-term Plyometric Training Program on Sprint and Jump Performance of Young Male Track Athletes.赛季内短期增强式训练计划对年轻男性田径运动员短跑和跳跃成绩的影响。
J Strength Cond Res. 2015 Aug;29(8):2128-36. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000860.
10
Comparison of Whole-Body Electromyostimulation versus Recognized Back-Strengthening Exercise Training on Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Study.全身肌电刺激与公认的腰背强化训练治疗慢性非特异性下腰痛的比较:一项随机对照研究。
Biomed Res Int. 2019 Sep 29;2019:5745409. doi: 10.1155/2019/5745409. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Passive Warm-Up Using High-Voltage Pulsed-Current Electrical Stimulation on Jump Performance in Young Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial.高压脉冲电流电刺激被动热身对年轻人跳跃性能的影响:一项随机对照试验
Cureus. 2025 Apr 2;17(4):e81594. doi: 10.7759/cureus.81594. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Assessing the Impact of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation-Based Fingerboard Training versus Conventional Fingerboard Training on Finger Flexor Endurance in Intermediate to Advanced Sports Climbers: A Randomized Controlled Study.评估基于神经肌肉电刺激的指板训练与传统指板训练对中高级运动攀岩者手指屈肌耐力的影响:一项随机对照研究。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Jun 24;24(13):4100. doi: 10.3390/s24134100.
3
No beneficial effect of aerobic whole-body electromyostimulation on lower limbs strength and power - a randomized controlled trial.有氧运动性全身肌电刺激对下肢力量和功率无有益影响——一项随机对照试验。
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2024 Jul 2;16(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s13102-024-00931-4.
4
The Effect of Whole-Body Electromyostimulation Program on Physical Performance and Selected Cardiometabolic Markers in Obese Young Females.全身肌电刺激方案对肥胖年轻女性身体机能和部分心血管代谢指标的影响。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Jan 29;60(2):230. doi: 10.3390/medicina60020230.
5
Non-Athletic Cohorts Enrolled in Longitudinal Whole-Body Electromyostimulation Trials-An Evidence Map.纳入纵向全身肌电刺激试验的非运动员队列 - 证据图谱。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Feb 2;24(3):972. doi: 10.3390/s24030972.
6
Immediate Effects of Whole-Body versus Local Dynamic Electrostimulation of the Abdominal Muscles in Healthy People Assessed by Ultrasound: A Randomized Controlled Trial.通过超声评估全身与局部动态电刺激对健康人腹部肌肉的即时效应:一项随机对照试验。
Biology (Basel). 2023 Mar 16;12(3):454. doi: 10.3390/biology12030454.
7
Additional Active Movements Are Not Required for Strength Gains in the Untrained during Short-Term Whole-Body Electromyostimulation Training.在短期全身肌电刺激训练期间,未经训练者力量增加并不需要额外的主动运动。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Mar 3;11(5):741. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11050741.
8
NMES superimposed on movement is equally effective as heavy slow resistance training in patellar tendinopathy.经皮神经电刺激叠加运动与大重量慢阻力训练治疗髌腱腱病同样有效。
J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2022 Dec 1;22(4):474-485.
9
Profile of Whole Body Electromyostimulation Training Users-A Pilot Study.全身肌电刺激训练用户特征分析 - 一项初步研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 13;19(8):4711. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084711.
10
Can A Superimposed Whole-Body Electromyostimulation Intervention Enhance the Effects of a 10-Week Athletic Strength Training in Youth Elite Soccer Players?全身叠加肌电刺激干预能否增强青少年精英足球运动员 10 周体能训练的效果?
J Sports Sci Med. 2020 Aug 13;19(3):535-546. eCollection 2020 Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Whole-Body Electromyostimulation versus Recognized Back-Strengthening Exercise Training on Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Study.全身肌电刺激与公认的腰背强化训练治疗慢性非特异性下腰痛的比较:一项随机对照研究。
Biomed Res Int. 2019 Sep 29;2019:5745409. doi: 10.1155/2019/5745409. eCollection 2019.
2
Adjustment Effects of Maximum Intensity Tolerance During Whole-Body Electromyostimulation Training.全身肌电刺激训练期间最大强度耐受的调整效应
Front Physiol. 2019 Jul 24;10:920. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00920. eCollection 2019.
3
Effects of an Eight-Week Superimposed Submaximal Dynamic Whole-Body Electromyostimulation Training on Strength and Power Parameters of the Leg Muscles: A Randomized Controlled Intervention Study.为期八周的叠加次最大动态全身肌电刺激训练对腿部肌肉力量和功率参数的影响:一项随机对照干预研究。
Front Physiol. 2018 Dec 5;9:1719. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01719. eCollection 2018.
4
Whole-Body Electromyostimulation Improves Performance-Related Parameters in Runners.全身肌电刺激可改善跑步者与运动表现相关的参数。
Front Physiol. 2018 Nov 13;9:1576. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01576. eCollection 2018.
5
Effects of whole-body electromyostimulation on chronic nonspecific low back pain in adults: a randomized controlled study.全身肌电刺激对成人慢性非特异性下腰痛的影响:一项随机对照研究。
J Pain Res. 2018 Sep 20;11:1949-1957. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S164904. eCollection 2018.
6
Functional Exercise Training and Undulating Periodization Enhances the Effect of Whole-Body Electromyostimulation Training on Running Performance.功能性运动训练与波动周期化训练可增强全身肌电刺激训练对跑步成绩的影响。
Front Physiol. 2018 Jun 13;9:720. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00720. eCollection 2018.
7
Efficacy and Safety of Low Frequency Whole-Body Electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) to Improve Health-Related Outcomes in Non-athletic Adults. A Systematic Review.低频全身肌电刺激(WB-EMS)改善非运动员成年人健康相关结局的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价
Front Physiol. 2018 May 23;9:573. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00573. eCollection 2018.
8
Effects of a Whole-Body Electrostimulation Program on Strength, Sprinting, Jumping, and Kicking Capacity in Elite Soccer Players.全身电刺激训练计划对精英足球运动员力量、短跑、跳跃和踢球能力的影响。
J Sports Sci Med. 2016 Dec 1;15(4):639-648. eCollection 2016 Dec.
9
Effects of Whole-Body Electromyostimulation versus High-Intensity Resistance Exercise on Body Composition and Strength: A Randomized Controlled Study.全身肌电刺激与高强度抗阻运动对身体成分和力量的影响:一项随机对照研究。
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2016;2016:9236809. doi: 10.1155/2016/9236809. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
10
Can the Use of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Be Improved to Optimize Quadriceps Strengthening?能否改进神经肌肉电刺激的使用以优化股四头肌强化?
Sports Health. 2016 Jan-Feb;8(1):79-85. doi: 10.1177/1941738115618174.