Pan Yafeng, Cheng Xiaojun
School of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Apr 24;11:301. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00301. eCollection 2020.
Social interaction is ubiquitous in human society. The two-person approach-a new, powerful tool to study information exchange and social behaviors-aims to characterize the behavioral dynamics and neural mechanisms of real-time social interactions. In this review, we discuss the benefits of two-person approaches compared to those for conventional, single-person approaches. We describe measures and paradigms that model social interaction in three dimensions (3-D), including eye-to-eye, body-to-body, and brain-to-brain relationships. We then discuss how these two-person measures and paradigms are used in psychiatric conditions (e.g., autism, mood disorders, schizophrenia, borderline personality disorder, and psychotherapy). Furthermore, the advantages of a two-person approach (e.g., dual brain stimulation, multi-person neurofeedback) in clinical interventions are described. Finally, we discuss the methodological and translational challenges surrounding the application of two-person approaches in psychiatry, as well as prospects for future two-/multi-person studies. We conclude that two-person approaches serve as useful additions to the range of behavioral and neuroscientific methods available to assess social interaction in psychiatric settings, for both diagnostic techniques and complementary interventions.
社会互动在人类社会中无处不在。两人研究方法——一种用于研究信息交流和社会行为的全新且强大的工具——旨在刻画实时社会互动的行为动态和神经机制。在本综述中,我们讨论了两人研究方法相较于传统单人研究方法的优势。我们描述了在三个维度(3-D)上对社会互动进行建模的测量方法和范式,包括眼对眼、身体对身体以及脑对脑的关系。然后,我们讨论了这些两人测量方法和范式如何应用于精神疾病(如自闭症、情绪障碍、精神分裂症、边缘型人格障碍和心理治疗)。此外,还描述了两人研究方法(如双脑刺激、多人神经反馈)在临床干预中的优势。最后,我们讨论了两人研究方法在精神病学应用中面临的方法学和转化挑战,以及未来两人/多人研究的前景。我们得出结论,两人研究方法是可用于评估精神病学环境中社会互动的一系列行为和神经科学方法的有益补充,无论是对于诊断技术还是补充性干预而言。