• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自然灾害期间社交媒体上的信息传播

Information Diffusion on Social Media During Natural Disasters.

作者信息

Dong Rongsheng, Li Libing, Zhang Qingpeng, Cai Guoyong

机构信息

1Guangxi Key Laboratory of Trusted SoftwareGuilin University of Electronic TechnologyGuilin541004China.

2Mintaian Insurance Surveyors & Loss Adjusters Group Company Ltd.Shenzhen518000China.

出版信息

IEEE Trans Comput Soc Syst. 2018 Jan 11;5(1):265-276. doi: 10.1109/TCSS.2017.2786545. eCollection 2018 Mar.

DOI:10.1109/TCSS.2017.2786545
PMID:32391405
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7176041/
Abstract

Social media analytics has drawn new quantitative insights of human activity patterns. Many applications of social media analytics, from pandemic prediction to earthquake response, require an in-depth understanding of how these patterns change when human encounter unfamiliar conditions. In this paper, we select two earthquakes in China as the social context in Sina-Weibo (or Weibo for short), the largest Chinese microblog site. After proposing a formalized Weibo information flow model to represent the information spread on Weibo, we study the information spread from three main perspectives: individual characteristics, the types of social relationships between interactive participants, and the topology of real interaction networks. The quantitative analyses draw the following conclusions. First, the shadow of Dunbar's number is evident in the "declared friends/followers" distributions, and the number of each participant's friends/followers who also participated in the earthquake information dissemination show the typical power-law distribution, indicating a rich-gets-richer phenomenon. Second, an individual's number of followers is the most critical factor in user influence. Strangers are very important forces for disseminating real-time news after an earthquake. Third, two types of real interaction networks share the scale-free and small-world property, but with a looser organizational structure. In addition, correlations between different influence groups indicate that when compared with other online social media, the discussion on Weibo is mainly dominated and influenced by verified users.

摘要

社交媒体分析已经得出了关于人类活动模式的新的定量见解。社交媒体分析的许多应用,从大流行预测到地震响应,都需要深入了解当人类遇到不熟悉的情况时这些模式是如何变化的。在本文中,我们选择中国的两次地震作为中国最大的微博网站新浪微博(简称微博)中的社会背景。在提出一个形式化的微博信息流模型来表示微博上的信息传播之后,我们从三个主要角度研究信息传播:个体特征、互动参与者之间的社会关系类型以及真实互动网络的拓扑结构。定量分析得出以下结论。首先,邓巴数的影子在“宣称的朋友/关注者”分布中很明显,并且每个参与者的也参与了地震信息传播的朋友/关注者数量呈现典型的幂律分布,这表明了富者愈富的现象。其次,一个人的关注者数量是用户影响力的最关键因素。陌生人是地震后传播实时新闻的非常重要的力量。第三,两种类型的真实互动网络都具有无标度和小世界特性,但组织结构较为松散。此外,不同影响力群体之间的相关性表明,与其他在线社交媒体相比,微博上的讨论主要由认证用户主导和影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a474/7176041/f6cefb86c97d/zhang14ab-2786545.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a474/7176041/d31e3b7398a0/zhang1abc-2786545.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a474/7176041/b41c5d018429/zhang2-2786545.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a474/7176041/66f830c56de2/zhang3abcdef-2786545.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a474/7176041/8297c72a6320/zhang4ab-2786545.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a474/7176041/d3e3c9fdb950/zhang5abcd-2786545.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a474/7176041/a4e00a7b476c/zhang6-2786545.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a474/7176041/8bc9947e045c/zhang7abc-2786545.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a474/7176041/2bcb7960b561/zhang8ab-2786545.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a474/7176041/a888087d9223/zhang9abcdef-2786545.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a474/7176041/244b984d21bb/zhang10ab-2786545.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a474/7176041/db5cfe5d2ed0/zhang11ab-2786545.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a474/7176041/095b7eb21379/zhang12ab-2786545.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a474/7176041/aded14eb7d81/zhang13abcdefgh-2786545.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a474/7176041/f6cefb86c97d/zhang14ab-2786545.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a474/7176041/d31e3b7398a0/zhang1abc-2786545.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a474/7176041/b41c5d018429/zhang2-2786545.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a474/7176041/66f830c56de2/zhang3abcdef-2786545.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a474/7176041/8297c72a6320/zhang4ab-2786545.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a474/7176041/d3e3c9fdb950/zhang5abcd-2786545.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a474/7176041/a4e00a7b476c/zhang6-2786545.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a474/7176041/8bc9947e045c/zhang7abc-2786545.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a474/7176041/2bcb7960b561/zhang8ab-2786545.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a474/7176041/a888087d9223/zhang9abcdef-2786545.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a474/7176041/244b984d21bb/zhang10ab-2786545.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a474/7176041/db5cfe5d2ed0/zhang11ab-2786545.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a474/7176041/095b7eb21379/zhang12ab-2786545.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a474/7176041/aded14eb7d81/zhang13abcdefgh-2786545.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a474/7176041/f6cefb86c97d/zhang14ab-2786545.jpg

相似文献

1
Information Diffusion on Social Media During Natural Disasters.自然灾害期间社交媒体上的信息传播
IEEE Trans Comput Soc Syst. 2018 Jan 11;5(1):265-276. doi: 10.1109/TCSS.2017.2786545. eCollection 2018 Mar.
2
Exploiting Information Diffusion Feature for Link Prediction in Sina Weibo.利用信息传播特征进行新浪微博中的链接预测
Sci Rep. 2016 Jan 28;6:20058. doi: 10.1038/srep20058.
3
The Impact of Social Media on Risk Communication of Disasters-A Comparative Study Based on Weibo Blogs Related to Tianjin Explosion and Typhoon Pigeon.社交媒体对灾害风险沟通的影响——基于微博博客的比较研究,以天津爆炸和台风“天鸽”为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 31;17(3):883. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17030883.
4
The Use of Microblog "Weibo" by Chinese Patent Medicine Companies in China.中国中成药企业对微博的使用情况
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2019 Jul;53(4):490-496. doi: 10.1177/2168479018798799. Epub 2018 Sep 16.
5
Event-based user classification in Weibo media.微博媒体中基于事件的用户分类
ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:479872. doi: 10.1155/2014/479872. Epub 2014 Jul 16.
6
Social Media Behavior and Emotional Evolution during Emergency Events.紧急事件期间的社交媒体行为与情绪演变
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Aug 27;9(9):1109. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9091109.
7
Attitudes towards suicide attempts broadcast on social media: an exploratory study of Chinese microblogs.社交媒体上对自杀未遂事件的态度:一项关于中国微博的探索性研究。
PeerJ. 2015 Sep 8;3:e1209. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1209. eCollection 2015.
8
A comparative analysis for spatio-temporal spreading patterns of emergency news.突发新闻时空传播模式的比较分析。
Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 10;10(1):19472. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76162-7.
9
Nearcasting forwarding behaviors and information propagation in Chinese Sina-Microblog.中文新浪微博中的近传播转发行为和信息传播。
Math Biosci Eng. 2019 Jun 11;16(5):5380-5394. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019268.
10
Creating a Chinese suicide dictionary for identifying suicide risk on social media.创建一个用于识别社交媒体上自杀风险的中文自杀词典。
PeerJ. 2015 Dec 15;3:e1455. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1455. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Towards quantifying the communication aspect of resilience in disaster-prone communities.迈向量化灾害频发社区中适应力的沟通层面。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 17;14(1):8837. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-59192-3.
2
Exploring the impact of sentiment on multi-dimensional information dissemination using COVID-19 data in China.利用中国新冠肺炎数据探索情绪对多维度信息传播的影响。
Comput Human Behav. 2023 Jul;144:107733. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2023.107733. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
3
Cross-platform analysis of public responses to the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquake sequence on Twitter and Reddit.

本文引用的文献

1
Multi-level functionality of social media in the aftermath of the Great East Japan Earthquake.社交媒体在东日本大地震后的多层次功能。
Disasters. 2014 Jul;38 Suppl 2:S123-43. doi: 10.1111/disa.12071.
2
Reality check for the Chinese microblog space: a random sampling approach.中文微博空间的现实性检验:随机抽样方法。
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e58356. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058356. Epub 2013 Mar 8.
3
Understanding crowd-powered search groups: a social network perspective.理解众包搜索群体:社会网络视角。
跨平台分析公众在 Twitter 和 Reddit 上对 2019 年里德斯克里克地震序列的反应。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 31;12(1):1634. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05359-9.
4
Information Preference and Information Supply Efficiency Evaluation before, during, and after an Earthquake: Evidence from Songyuan, China.震前、震中和震后信息偏好与信息供给效率评估:来自中国松原的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 11;18(24):13070. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413070.
5
Microblog Topic-Words Detection Model for Earthquake Emergency Responses Based on Information Classification Hierarchy.基于信息分类层次的地震应急微博话题词检测模型。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 28;18(15):8000. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18158000.
6
Aggressions on Social Networks: What Are the Implications for Healthcare Providers? An Exploratory Research.社交网络上的攻击行为:对医疗服务提供者有何影响?一项探索性研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Jun 28;9(7):811. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9070811.
PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39749. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039749. Epub 2012 Jun 27.
4
Is Dunbar's number up?邓巴数理论是否已过时?
Br J Psychol. 2012 May;103(2):174-6; discussion 180-2. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02075.x. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
5
Geophysics. Transforming earthquake detection?
Science. 2012 Jan 20;335(6066):297-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1214650.
6
Time-critical social mobilization.时间关键型社会动员。
Science. 2011 Oct 28;334(6055):509-12. doi: 10.1126/science.1205869.
7
Modeling users' activity on twitter networks: validation of Dunbar's number.在推特网络上模拟用户的活动:邓巴数的验证。
PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e22656. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022656. Epub 2011 Aug 3.
8
Collective response of human populations to large-scale emergencies.人类群体对大规模紧急情况的集体反应。
PLoS One. 2011 Mar 30;6(3):e17680. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017680.
9
Pandemics in the age of Twitter: content analysis of Tweets during the 2009 H1N1 outbreak.推特时代的大流行疫情:2009 年 H1N1 爆发期间推文的内容分析。
PLoS One. 2010 Nov 29;5(11):e14118. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014118.
10
Community structure in time-dependent, multiscale, and multiplex networks.时变、多尺度和多重网络中的社区结构。
Science. 2010 May 14;328(5980):876-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1184819.