• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

跨平台分析公众在 Twitter 和 Reddit 上对 2019 年里德斯克里克地震序列的反应。

Cross-platform analysis of public responses to the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquake sequence on Twitter and Reddit.

机构信息

Department of Computer Science, University of Colorado Boulder, 430 UCB, Boulder, CO, 80309, USA.

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 7000 East Ave, Livermore, CA, 94550, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 31;12(1):1634. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05359-9.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-05359-9
PMID:35102161
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8803888/
Abstract

Online social networks (OSNs) have become a powerful tool to study collective human responses to extreme events such as earthquakes. Most previous research concentrated on a single platform and utilized users' behaviors on a single platform to study people's general responses. In this study, we explore the characteristics of people's behaviors on different OSNs and conduct a cross-platform analysis of public responses to earthquakes. Our findings support the Uses and Gratification theory that users on Reddit and Twitter are engaging with platforms that they may feel best reflect their sense of self. Using the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquakes as our study cases, we collected 510,579 tweets and 45,770 Reddit posts (including 1437 submissions and 44,333 comments) to answer the following research questions: (1) What were the similarities and differences between public responses on Twitter and Reddit? (2) Considering the different mechanisms of Twitter and Reddit, what unique information of public responses can we learn from Reddit as compared with Twitter? By answering these research questions, we aim to bridge the gap of cross-platform public responses research towards natural hazards. Our study evinces that the users on the two different platforms have both different topics of interest and different sentiments towards the same earthquake, which indicates the necessity of investigating cross-platform OSNs to reveal a more comprehensive picture of people's general public responses towards certain disasters. Our analysis also finds that r/conspiracy subreddit is one of the major venues where people discuss the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquakes on Reddit and different misinformation/conspiracies spread on Twitter and Reddit platforms (e.g., "Big one is coming" on Twitter and "Nuclear test" on Reddit).

摘要

在线社交网络(OSN)已成为研究人类对地震等极端事件的集体反应的有力工具。大多数先前的研究都集中在单一平台上,并利用用户在单一平台上的行为来研究人们的一般反应。在这项研究中,我们探讨了人们在不同 OSN 上的行为特征,并对公众对地震的跨平台反应进行了分析。我们的研究结果支持使用与满足理论,即 Reddit 和 Twitter 的用户正在使用他们可能认为最能反映自我意识的平台。我们以 2019 年里德克里克地震为例,收集了 510579 条推文和 45770 条 Reddit 帖子(包括 1437 条提交和 44333 条评论),以回答以下研究问题:(1)Twitter 和 Reddit 上的公众反应有哪些相似之处和不同之处?(2)考虑到 Twitter 和 Reddit 的不同机制,与 Twitter 相比,我们能从 Reddit 中学到公众反应的哪些独特信息?通过回答这些研究问题,我们旨在弥合自然灾害跨平台公众反应研究的差距。我们的研究表明,两个不同平台上的用户对同一地震既有不同的兴趣主题,也有不同的情绪,这表明有必要调查跨平台 OSN,以更全面地了解人们对某些灾害的普遍公众反应。我们的分析还发现,r/conspiracy 子版块是 Reddit 上人们讨论 2019 年里德克里克地震的主要场所之一,而 Twitter 和 Reddit 平台上也传播了不同的错误信息/阴谋论(例如,Twitter 上的“大震即将来临”和 Reddit 上的“核试验”)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd41/8803888/90c78c04adf3/41598_2022_5359_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd41/8803888/4c244453c5c7/41598_2022_5359_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd41/8803888/1b70d2750a5d/41598_2022_5359_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd41/8803888/e9da67e76e67/41598_2022_5359_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd41/8803888/147ca665e759/41598_2022_5359_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd41/8803888/414043e7cbd0/41598_2022_5359_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd41/8803888/7dc0e641dae7/41598_2022_5359_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd41/8803888/90c78c04adf3/41598_2022_5359_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd41/8803888/4c244453c5c7/41598_2022_5359_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd41/8803888/1b70d2750a5d/41598_2022_5359_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd41/8803888/e9da67e76e67/41598_2022_5359_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd41/8803888/147ca665e759/41598_2022_5359_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd41/8803888/414043e7cbd0/41598_2022_5359_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd41/8803888/7dc0e641dae7/41598_2022_5359_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd41/8803888/90c78c04adf3/41598_2022_5359_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Cross-platform analysis of public responses to the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquake sequence on Twitter and Reddit.跨平台分析公众在 Twitter 和 Reddit 上对 2019 年里德斯克里克地震序列的反应。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 31;12(1):1634. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05359-9.
2
Topics Analysis of Reddit and Twitter Posts Discussing Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Distress From 2017 to 2019.2017年至2019年Reddit和Twitter上讨论炎症性肠病及痛苦的帖子主题分析
Crohns Colitis 360. 2021 Jul 7;3(3):otab044. doi: 10.1093/crocol/otab044. eCollection 2021 Jul.
3
Comparing the Discussion of Telehealth in Two Social Media Platforms: Social Listening Analysis.比较两个社交媒体平台上远程医疗的讨论:社交倾听分析
Telemed Rep. 2023 Aug 3;4(1):236-248. doi: 10.1089/tmr.2023.0008. eCollection 2023.
4
Identifying Topics for E-Cigarette User-Generated Contents: A Case Study From Multiple Social Media Platforms.识别电子烟用户生成内容的主题:来自多个社交媒体平台的案例研究
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jan 20;19(1):e24. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5780.
5
Predicting Age Groups of Reddit Users Based on Posting Behavior and Metadata: Classification Model Development and Validation.基于发帖行为和元数据预测 Reddit 用户年龄组:分类模型的开发和验证。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Mar 16;7(3):e25807. doi: 10.2196/25807.
6
Characterizing Social Media Messages Related to Underage JUUL E-Cigarette Buying and Selling: Cross-Sectional Analysis of Reddit Subreddits.描述与未成年人购买和销售JUUL电子烟相关的社交媒体信息:Reddit子版块的横断面分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 20;22(7):e16962. doi: 10.2196/16962.
7
COVID-19 and the 5G Conspiracy Theory: Social Network Analysis of Twitter Data.新冠疫情与5G阴谋论:基于推特数据的社交网络分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 6;22(5):e19458. doi: 10.2196/19458.
8
Multiple social platforms reveal actionable signals for software vulnerability awareness: A study of GitHub, Twitter and Reddit.多个社交平台揭示了软件漏洞意识的可操作信号:对 GitHub、Twitter 和 Reddit 的研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 24;15(3):e0230250. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230250. eCollection 2020.
9
Comparing Naturalistic Mental Health Expressions on Student Loan Debts Using Reddit and Twitter.比较 Reddit 和 Twitter 上有关学生贷款债务的自然主义心理健康表达。
J Evid Based Soc Work (2019). 2023 Sep 3;20(5):727-742. doi: 10.1080/26408066.2023.2202668. Epub 2023 Apr 16.
10
Examining thematic and emotional differences across Twitter, Reddit, and YouTube: The case of COVID-19 vaccine side effects.审视推特、红迪网和优兔上的主题和情感差异:以新冠疫苗副作用为例。
Comput Human Behav. 2023 Jul;144:107734. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2023.107734. Epub 2023 Mar 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Insight into public sentiment and demand in China's public health emergency response: a weibo data analysis.洞察中国公共卫生应急响应中的公众情绪与需求:一项微博数据分析
BMC Public Health. 2025 Apr 10;25(1):1349. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22553-2.
2
Mapping automatic social media information disorder. The role of bots and AI in spreading misleading information in society.自动社交媒体信息混乱的映射。机器人和人工智能在社会传播误导性信息中的作用。
PLoS One. 2024 May 31;19(5):e0303183. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303183. eCollection 2024.
3
Dynamics and characteristics of misinformation related to earthquake predictions on Twitter.

本文引用的文献

1
Information Diffusion on Social Media During Natural Disasters.自然灾害期间社交媒体上的信息传播
IEEE Trans Comput Soc Syst. 2018 Jan 11;5(1):265-276. doi: 10.1109/TCSS.2017.2786545. eCollection 2018 Mar.
2
Hierarchical interlocked orthogonal faulting in the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquake sequence.2019 年里德克里斯特地震序列中的分层互锁正交断裂。
Science. 2019 Oct 18;366(6463):346-351. doi: 10.1126/science.aaz0109. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
3
Social media use in emergency management.社交媒体在应急管理中的应用。
推特上与地震预测相关的错误信息的动态变化及特征
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 17;13(1):13391. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40399-9.
4
Social informedness and investor sentiment in the GameStop short squeeze.游戏驿站空头挤压事件中的社会信息与投资者情绪
Electron Mark. 2023;33(1):23. doi: 10.1007/s12525-023-00632-9. Epub 2023 May 23.
5
Twitter data from the 2019-20 Australian bushfires reveals participatory and temporal variations in social media use for disaster recovery.2019-20 年澳大利亚丛林大火期间的推特数据揭示了社交媒体在灾难恢复中的参与性和时间性变化。
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 8;12(1):16914. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-21265-6.
6
Information sharing practices during the COVID-19 pandemic: A case study about face masks.在 COVID-19 大流行期间的信息共享实践:以口罩为例的案例研究。
PLoS One. 2022 May 5;17(5):e0268043. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268043. eCollection 2022.
J Emerg Manag. 2015 Jul-Aug;13(4):281-94. doi: 10.5055/jem.2015.0242.
4
Earthquake beliefs and adoption of seismic hazard adjustments.地震观念与地震灾害调整措施的采用
Risk Anal. 2004 Feb;24(1):87-102. doi: 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00414.x.