Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Department of Neurology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
JAMA Neurol. 2020 Aug 1;77(8):955-965. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.0989.
The diagnostic performance of second-generation tau positron emission tomographic (PET) tracers is not yet known.
To examine the novel tau PET tracer RO948 F 18 ([18F]RO948) performance in discriminating Alzheimer disease (AD) from non-AD neurodegenerative disorders.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this diagnostic study, 613 participants in the Swedish BioFINDER-2 study were consecutively enrolled in a prospective cross-sectional study from September 4, 2017, to August 28, 2019. Participants included 257 cognitively unimpaired controls, 154 patients with mild cognitive impairment, 100 patients with AD dementia, and 102 with non-AD neurodegenerative disorders. Evaluation included a comparison of tau PET tracer [18F]RO948 with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and cerebrospinal fluid and a head-to-head comparison between [18F]RO948 and flortaucipir F 18 ([18F]flortaucipir) in patients with semantic variant primary progressive aphasia (svPPA).
[18F]RO948 (all patients) and [18F]flortaucipir (3 patients with svPPA) tau PET; MRI (hippocampal volume, composite temporal lobe cortical thickness, whole-brain cortical thickness) and cerebrospinal fluid measures (p-tau181 and amyloid Aβ42 and Aβ40 ratio[Aβ42/Aβ40], and Aβ42/p-tau181 ratio).
Standard uptake value ratios (SUVRs) in 4 predefined regions of interest (ROIs) reflecting Braak staging scheme for tau pathology and encompass I-II (entorhinal cortex), III-IV (inferior/middle temporal, fusiform gyrus, parahippocampal cortex, and amygdala), I-IV, and V-VI (widespread neocortical areas), area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values, and subtraction images between [18F]RO948 and [18F]flortaucipir.
Diagnostic groups among the 613 participants included cognitively unimpaired (mean [SD] age, 65.8 [12.1] years; 117 men [46%]), mild cognitive impairment (age, 70.8 [8.3] years; 82 men [53%]), AD dementia (age, 73.5 [6.7] years; 57 men [57%]), and non-AD disorders (age, 70.5 [8.6] years; 41 men [40%]). Retention of [18F]RO948 was higher in AD dementia compared with all other diagnostic groups. [18F]RO948 could distinguish patients with AD dementia from individuals without cognitive impairment and those with non-AD disorders, and the highest AUC was obtained using the I-IV ROI (AUC = 0.98; 95% CI, 0.96-0.99 for AD vs no cognitive impairment and AUC = 0.97; 95% CI, 0.95-0.99 for AD vs non-AD disorders), which outperformed MRI (highest AUC = 0.91 for AD vs no cognitive impairment using whole-brain thickness, and AUC = 0.80 for AD vs non-AD disorders using temporal lobe thickness) and cerebrospinal fluid measures (highest AUC = 0.94 for AD vs no cognitive impairment using Aβ42/p-tau181, and AUC = 0.93 for AD vs non-AD disorders using Aβ42/Aβ40). Generally, tau PET positivity using [18F]RO948 was observed only in Aβ-positive cases or in MAPT R406W mutation carriers. Retention of [18F]RO948 was not pronounced in patients with svPPA, and head-to-head comparison revealed lower temporal lobe uptake than with [18F]flortaucipir.
In this study, elevated [18F]RO948 SUVRs were most often seen among Aβ-positive cases, which suggests that [18F]RO948 has high specificity for AD-type tau and highlights its potential as a diagnostic marker in the differential diagnosis of AD.
第二代 tau 正电子发射断层扫描(PET)示踪剂的诊断性能尚不清楚。
检查新型 tau PET 示踪剂 RO948 F 18([18F]RO948)在区分阿尔茨海默病(AD)与非 AD 神经退行性疾病方面的性能。
设计、地点和参与者:在这项诊断研究中,来自 2017 年 9 月 4 日至 2019 年 8 月 28 日,瑞典 BioFINDER-2 研究中的 613 名参与者连续入组一项前瞻性横断面研究。参与者包括 257 名认知正常的对照者、154 名轻度认知障碍患者、100 名 AD 痴呆患者和 102 名非 AD 神经退行性疾病患者。评估包括 tau PET 示踪剂[18F]RO948 与磁共振成像(MRI)和脑脊液的比较,以及语义变异原发性进行性失语症(svPPA)患者中[18F]RO948 与 flortaucipir F 18([18F]flortaucipir)的直接比较。
[18F]RO948(所有患者)和[18F]flortaucipir(3 名 svPPA 患者)tau PET;MRI(海马体积、复合颞叶皮质厚度、全脑皮质厚度)和脑脊液指标(p-tau181 和 Aβ42 和 Aβ40 比值[Aβ42/Aβ40],以及 Aβ42/p-tau181 比值)。
4 个预设感兴趣区(ROI)的标准化摄取值比值(SUVRs)反映 tau 病理学的 Braak 分期方案,包括 I-II(内嗅皮质)、III-IV(下/中颞叶、梭状回、海马旁皮质和杏仁核)、I-IV 和 V-VI(广泛的新皮质区域),曲线下面积(AUC)值,以及[18F]RO948 和[18F]flortaucipir 之间的减影图像。
613 名参与者中的诊断组包括认知正常者(平均[SD]年龄 65.8[12.1]岁;117 名男性[46%])、轻度认知障碍者(年龄 70.8[8.3]岁;82 名男性[53%])、AD 痴呆者(年龄 73.5[6.7]岁;57 名男性[57%])和非 AD 疾病者(年龄 70.5[8.6]岁;41 名男性[40%])。与其他所有诊断组相比,AD 痴呆患者中[18F]RO948 的保留率更高。[18F]RO948 可将 AD 痴呆患者与无认知障碍者和非 AD 疾病患者区分开来,使用 I-IV ROI 获得的 AUC 最高(AD 与无认知障碍者的 AUC 值为 0.98;95%CI,0.96-0.99;AD 与非 AD 疾病者的 AUC 值为 0.97;95%CI,0.95-0.99),优于 MRI(AD 与无认知障碍者使用全脑厚度的 AUC 值最高为 0.91,AD 与非 AD 疾病者使用颞叶厚度的 AUC 值最高为 0.80)和脑脊液指标(AD 与无认知障碍者使用 Aβ42/p-tau181 的 AUC 值最高为 0.94,AD 与非 AD 疾病者使用 Aβ42/Aβ40 的 AUC 值最高为 0.93)。一般来说,只有在 Aβ 阳性病例或 MAPT R406W 突变携带者中才观察到[18F]RO948 的 tau PET 阳性。在 svPPA 患者中,[18F]RO948 的保留率并不明显,并且直接比较显示颞叶摄取低于[18F]flortaucipir。
在这项研究中,最常见的是 Aβ 阳性病例中出现升高的[18F]RO948 SUVRs,这表明[18F]RO948 对 AD 型 tau 具有很高的特异性,并突出了其作为 AD 鉴别诊断中诊断标志物的潜力。