• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[卵母细胞玻璃化冷冻的临床应用]

[Clinical application of vitrification freezing of oocytes].

作者信息

Xu W, Zhu H Y, Tong X M, Zhang S Y

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310016, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2020 May 12;100(18):1409-1413. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20191108-02424.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20191108-02424
PMID:32392992
Abstract

To evaluate the effect of oocyte vitrification on embryo quality and developmental potential. From January 2014 to December 2017, 30 cases of oocytes vitrification in the reproductive center of Sir Run Run Shaw hospital were collected as the frozen group, due to failure of sperm extraction or inability to obtain sufficient sperm at the ovum pick-up-day because of oligoospermia or azoospermia. 220 cases of fresh oocytes from the same period were selected as the fresh group. The fertilization rate, embryo rate, pregnancy rate, implantation rate and live birth rate of the two groups were compared retrospectively. The survival rate of oocyte resuscitation was 91.4% (180/197). In the frozen group, 24 cases were transferred with 14 pregnancies, while in the fresh group, 31 cases were transferred with 18 pregnancies. The number of 2PN fertilized eggs, 2PN embryos and 2PN high-quality embryos in the frozen group was significantly lower than that in the fresh group (3.7±2.5 vs 7.3±4.8), (3.3±2.5 vs 7.2±4.8), and (1.2±1.8 vs 2.9±2.7) (all 0.05). The fertilization rate of the frozen group was 77.2% (115/149) and the high-quality embryo rate was 36.6% (37/101), lower than that of the fresh group 77.6% (1 637/2 109) and 40.9% (651/1 591) (0.05).The pregnancy rate of the frozen group was 58.3% (14/24) higher than that of the fresh group 58.1% (18/31), the implantation rate of each mature oocyte and the live birth rate of each mature oocyte were 10.8% (15/138) and 10.8% (15/138), both higher than that of the fresh group 9.6% (21/218) and 8.7% (19/218) (all 0.05). Vitrification cryopreservation of oocytes may lead to a decrease in embryo quality, but embryo development potential is still considerable. Higher pregnancy rate, implantation rate and live birth rate may be obtained.

摘要

评估卵母细胞玻璃化冷冻对胚胎质量及发育潜能的影响。2014年1月至2017年12月,收集浙江大学医学院附属邵逸夫医院生殖中心30例因取精失败或因少弱精、无精症在取卵日未能获取足够精子而行卵母细胞玻璃化冷冻的患者作为冷冻组。同期选取220例行新鲜卵母细胞的患者作为新鲜组。回顾性比较两组的受精率、胚胎率、妊娠率、种植率及活产率。卵母细胞复苏存活率为91.4%(180/197)。冷冻组移植24例,妊娠14例;新鲜组移植31例,妊娠18例。冷冻组2PN受精卵、2PN胚胎及2PN优质胚胎数量均显著低于新鲜组(3.7±2.5 vs 7.3±4.8)、(3.3±2.5 vs 7.2±4.8)及(1.2±1.8 vs 2.9±2.7)(均P<0.05)。冷冻组受精率为77.2%(115/149),优质胚胎率为36.6%(37/101),低于新鲜组的77.6%(1637/2109)及40.9%(651/1591)(P<0.05)。冷冻组妊娠率为58.3%(14/24),高于新鲜组的58.1%(18/31);冷冻组每个成熟卵母细胞的种植率及活产率分别为10.8%(15/138)及10.8%(15/138),均高于新鲜组的9.6%(21/218)及8.7%(19/218)(均P<0.05)。卵母细胞玻璃化冷冻可能导致胚胎质量下降,但胚胎发育潜能仍可观,可获得较高的妊娠率、种植率及活产率。

相似文献

1
[Clinical application of vitrification freezing of oocytes].[卵母细胞玻璃化冷冻的临床应用]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2020 May 12;100(18):1409-1413. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20191108-02424.
2
What is the net effect of introducing vitrification for cryopreservation of surplus 2PN oocytes in an IVF program?在体外受精(IVF)程序中,引入玻璃化冷冻多余的双原核(2PN)卵母细胞的净效应是什么?
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018 Feb;297(2):529-537. doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4606-3. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
3
[Effects of cryopreservation time and thawing method of human oocyte vitrification on the outcome of assisted reproduction].[人卵母细胞玻璃化冷冻保存时间及解冻方法对辅助生殖结局的影响]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2010 Aug;45(8):578-82.
4
Successful elective and medically indicated oocyte vitrification and warming for autologous in vitro fertilization, with predicted birth probabilities for fertility preservation according to number of cryopreserved oocytes and age at retrieval.成功进行用于自体体外受精的选择性及医学指征性卵母细胞玻璃化冷冻与解冻,并根据冷冻卵母细胞数量及取卵时年龄预测生育力保存的出生概率。
Fertil Steril. 2016 Feb;105(2):459-66.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.10.026. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
5
Clinical application of oocyte vitrification: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.卵母细胞玻璃化冷冻的临床应用:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Fertil Steril. 2011 Aug;96(2):277-85. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.06.030. Epub 2011 Jun 30.
6
Evolution of human oocyte cryopreservation: slow freezing versus vitrification.人类卵母细胞冷冻保存的演变:慢速冷冻与玻璃化。
Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2016 Dec;23(6):445-450. doi: 10.1097/MED.0000000000000289.
7
A prospective pilot study comparing fertilization and embryo development between fresh and vitrified sibling oocytes.一项比较新鲜与玻璃化处理的同胞卵母细胞受精及胚胎发育情况的前瞻性试点研究。
Conn Med. 2013 Apr;77(4):211-7.
8
[Causes of oocyte vitrification and its value in assisted reproductive technology].[卵母细胞玻璃化冷冻的原因及其在辅助生殖技术中的价值]
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2019 Jul 30;39(7):766-771. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2019.07.03.
9
Freeze-all, oocyte vitrification, or fresh embryo transfer? Lessons from an egg-sharing donation program.冻卵、卵母细胞玻璃化冷冻或新鲜胚胎移植?卵子分享捐赠计划带来的启示。
Fertil Steril. 2016 Sep 1;106(3):615-22. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.05.004. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
10
How does vitrification affect oocyte viability in oocyte donation cycles? A prospective study to compare outcomes achieved with fresh versus vitrified sibling oocytes.玻璃化冷冻对供卵周期中卵母细胞活力有何影响?一项比较新鲜与玻璃化冷冻同卵姐妹卵母细胞获得结局的前瞻性研究。
Hum Reprod. 2013 Aug;28(8):2087-92. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det242. Epub 2013 Jun 5.

引用本文的文献

1
A Qualitative Study of Fertility Preservation Experience in Women with Breast Cancer.一项关于乳腺癌女性生育力保存经历的定性研究。
Int J Womens Health. 2025 Apr 23;17:1143-1155. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S517901. eCollection 2025.
2
Mature oocyte found during ovarian tissue cryopreservation in an early adolescent female.在一名早期青春期女性的卵巢组织冷冻保存过程中发现成熟卵母细胞。
Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024 Aug 25;53(4):527-530. doi: 10.3724/zdxbyxb-2023-0561.