利用遗传学进行社会科学研究。
Using genetics for social science.
机构信息
Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.
Department of Economics, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
出版信息
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Jun;4(6):567-576. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0862-5. Epub 2020 May 11.
Abstract
Social science genetics is concerned with understanding whether, how and why genetic differences between human beings are linked to differences in behaviours and socioeconomic outcomes. Our review discusses the goals, methods, challenges and implications of this research endeavour. We survey how the recent developments in genetics are beginning to provide social scientists with a powerful new toolbox they can use to better understand environmental effects, and we illustrate this with several substantive examples. Furthermore, we examine how medical research can benefit from genetic insights into social-scientific outcomes and vice versa. Finally, we discuss the ethical challenges of this work and clarify several common misunderstandings and misinterpretations of genetic research on individual differences.
摘要
社会科学遗传学关注的是理解人类之间的遗传差异与行为和社会经济结果之间的关联，以及这种关联存在的原因和方式。我们的综述讨论了这一研究工作的目标、方法、挑战和影响。我们调查了遗传学的最新进展如何开始为社会科学家提供一个强大的新工具箱，使他们能够更好地理解环境效应，并通过几个实质性的例子来说明这一点。此外，我们还研究了医学研究如何从对社会科学结果的遗传见解中受益，反之亦然。最后，我们讨论了这项工作的伦理挑战，并澄清了对个体差异的遗传研究的一些常见误解。
相似文献
1
Using genetics for social science.利用遗传学进行社会科学研究。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Jun;4(6):567-576. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0862-5. Epub 2020 May 11.
2
Integrating genetics and social science: genetic risk scores.整合遗传学与社会科学：遗传风险评分
Biodemography Soc Biol. 2014;60(2):137-55. doi: 10.1080/19485565.2014.946591.
3
Between (Racial) Groups and a Hard Place: An Exploration of Social Science Approaches to Race and Genetics, 2000-2014.在（种族）群体与困境之间：2000 - 2014年种族与遗传学的社会科学研究方法探索
Biodemography Soc Biol. 2016;62(3):281-299. doi: 10.1080/19485565.2016.1238299.
4
Dissecting the genetic background of multifactorial diseases and traits - A major challenge for genetic research.剖析多因素疾病和性状的遗传背景——遗传研究的一项重大挑战。
Mol Cell Probes. 2016 Dec;30(6):345. doi: 10.1016/j.mcp.2016.11.003.
5
Challenging the utility of polygenic scores for social science: Environmental confounding, downward causation, and unknown biology.质疑多基因评分在社会科学中的效用：环境混杂、下行因果关系和未知生物学。
Behav Brain Sci. 2022 May 13;46:e207. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X22001145.
6
The promise and challenges of incorporating genetic data into longitudinal social science surveys and research.将基因数据纳入纵向社会科学调查与研究的前景与挑战。
Biodemography Soc Biol. 2009;55(2):238-51. doi: 10.1080/19485560903415807.
7
[Clinical approach in social sciences, social psychology and clinical sociology].[社会科学、社会心理学和临床社会学中的临床方法]
Rech Soins Infirm. 1999 Dec(59):4-8.
8
(De)colonizing culture in community psychology: reflections from critical social science.去殖民化社区心理学中的文化：批判性社会科学的反思。
Am J Community Psychol. 2011 Mar;47(1-2):203-14. doi: 10.1007/s10464-010-9378-x.
9
Integrating genomic data and social science: challenges and opportunities.整合基因组数据与社会科学：挑战与机遇
Politics Life Sci. 2011 Fall;30(2):88-92. doi: 10.2990/30_2_88.
10
Social and behavioral science priorities for genomic translation.基因组转化的社会和行为科学优先事项。
Transl Behav Med. 2018 Jan 29;8(1):137-143. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibx052.
引用本文的文献
1
Psychometric properties of the Dating Violence Questionnaire for Victimization and Perpetration (DVQ-VP) in Ecuadorian population.厄瓜多尔人群中受害与施害约会暴力问卷（DVQ-VP）的心理测量特性。
Psicol Reflex Crit. 2025 Aug 21;38(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s41155-025-00359-w.
2
A Genetically Informed Study of Digital screen time, Video game play, and Impulsivity in Established Adulthood.一项关于成年期数字屏幕使用时间、电子游戏玩法与冲动性的基因关联研究。
Comput Human Behav. 2024 Dec;161. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2024.108401. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
3
Reply to Hirbo et al.: The need for large-scale family cohorts and robust analytical frameworks of postexome study.对希尔博等人的回复：外显子组研究需要大规模家系队列和强大的分析框架。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jul;122(26):e2511041122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2511041122. Epub 2025 Jun 13.
4
Socio-economic status is a social construct with heritable components and genetic consequences.社会经济地位是一种具有可遗传成分和遗传后果的社会结构。
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Mar 26. doi: 10.1038/s41562-025-02150-4.
5
Raising the Floor? Genetic Influences on Educational Attainment Through the Lens of the Evolving Swedish Welfare State.提高底线？从瑞典福利国家演变的视角看基因对受教育程度的影响
Behav Genet. 2025 May;55(3):199-214. doi: 10.1007/s10519-025-10219-z. Epub 2025 Mar 15.
6
(In)effectiveness of Frame-Inducing Rating Instructions in State-Trait Research.框架诱导评分指导语在状态-特质研究中的（无）效性
Stress Health. 2025 Apr;41(2):e70021. doi: 10.1002/smi.70021.
7
The association between temperament and polygenic score for psychopathology from infancy to middle childhood.从婴儿期到童年中期，气质与精神病理学多基因评分之间的关联。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2025 Feb 27. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.14140.
8
Associations between common genetic variants and income provide insights about the socio-economic health gradient.常见基因变异与收入之间的关联为社会经济健康梯度提供了见解。
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Apr;9(4):794-805. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-02080-7. Epub 2025 Jan 28.
9
Exome sequencing identifies genes for socioeconomic status in 350,770 individuals.外显子组测序在350770人中确定了与社会经济地位相关的基因。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jan 14;122(2):e2414018122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2414018122. Epub 2025 Jan 7.
10
Infrastructuring Educational Genomics: Associations, Architectures, and Apparatuses.构建教育基因组学：关联、架构与器具
Postdigit Sci Educ. 2024;6(4):1143-1172. doi: 10.1007/s42438-023-00451-3. Epub 2024 Feb 3.
本文引用的文献
1
Phenotypic Annotation: Using Polygenic Scores to Translate Discoveries From Genome-Wide Association Studies From the Top Down.表型注释：利用多基因评分从基因组全关联研究的发现进行自上而下的转化。
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2019 Feb;28(1):82-90. doi: 10.1177/0963721418807729. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
2
Genetic Endowments and Wealth Inequality.遗传天赋与财富不平等。
J Polit Econ. 2020 Apr;128(4):1474-1522. doi: 10.1086/705415.
3
Avoiding dynastic, assortative mating, and population stratification biases in Mendelian randomization through within-family analyses.通过家系内分析避免孟德尔随机化中的家族性、选择性交配和群体分层偏倚。
Nat Commun. 2020 Jul 14;11(1):3519. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17117-4.
4
Nature still battles nurture in the haunting world of social genomics.在社会基因组学这个令人难忘的领域里，先天因素与后天培养仍在较量。
Nature. 2018 Jan;553(7688):278-280. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-00578-5.
5
Variable prediction accuracy of polygenic scores within an ancestry group.群体内多基因评分的预测准确性存在差异。
Elife. 2020 Jan 30;9:e48376. doi: 10.7554/eLife.48376.
6
Within family Mendelian randomization studies.在家族性孟德尔随机化研究中。
Hum Mol Genet. 2019 Nov 21;28(R2):R170-R179. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddz204.
7
Genetic correlates of social stratification in Great Britain.英国社会分层的遗传相关性。
Nat Hum Behav. 2019 Dec;3(12):1332-1342. doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0757-5. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
8
Deconstructing the sources of genotype-phenotype associations in humans.剖析人类基因型-表型关联的来源。
Science. 2019 Sep 27;365(6460):1396-1400. doi: 10.1126/science.aax3710.
9
Genetic ancestry testing among white nationalists: From identity repair to citizen science.白人至上主义者的基因血统检测：从身份修复到公民科学。
Soc Stud Sci. 2019 Oct;49(5):653-681. doi: 10.1177/0306312719861434. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
10
Mendelian randomization: the challenge of unobserved environmental confounds.孟德尔随机化：未观察到的环境混杂因素的挑战。
Int J Epidemiol. 2019 Jun 1;48(3):665-671. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyz138.
Zotero 插件