Vera Lourdes A, Dillon Lindsey, Wylie Sara, Ohayon Jennifer Liss, Lemelin Aaron, Brown Phil, Sellers Christopher, Walker Dawn
Mobilization. 2018 Dec;23(4):511-529. doi: 10.17813/1086-671x-24-4-511.
The dismantlement of evidence-based environmental governance by the Trump Administration requires new forms of activism that uphold science and environmental regulatory agencies while critiquing the politics of knowledge production. The Environmental Data and Governance Initiative (EDGI) emerged after the November 2016 U.S. Presidential elections, becoming an organization of over 175 volunteer researchers, technologists, archivists, and activists innovating more just forms of government accountability and environmental regulation. Our successes include: 1) leading a public movement to archive vulnerable federal data evidencing climate change and environmental injustice; 2) conducting multi-sited interviews of current and former federal agency personnel regarding the transition into the Trump administration; 3) tracking changes to federal websites. In this article, we conduct a "social movement organizational autoethnography" on the field of movements intersecting within EDGI and on our theory, tactics, and practices. We offer ideas for expanding and iterating on methods of public, collaborative scholarship and advocacy.
特朗普政府对基于证据的环境治理的拆解,需要新形式的行动主义,这种行动主义在批判知识生产政治的同时,维护科学和环境监管机构。环境数据与治理倡议(EDGI)在2016年11月美国总统大选后应运而生,成为一个由175多名志愿者研究人员、技术专家、档案管理员和行动主义者组成的组织,致力于创新更公正的政府问责形式和环境监管方式。我们的成就包括:1)引领一场公众运动,对证明气候变化和环境不公的脆弱联邦数据进行存档;2)对现任和前任联邦机构人员就向特朗普政府过渡进行多地访谈;3)追踪联邦网站的变化。在本文中,我们对EDGI内部交叉的运动领域以及我们的理论、策略和实践进行了一次“社会运动组织自我民族志”研究。我们提出了关于扩展和迭代公共协作学术研究及宣传方法的想法。