Wong Sui Hsien, Eggenberger Eric, Cornblath Wayne, Xhepa Alba, Miranda Eduardo, Lee Helena, Burke Ailbhe, Barnett Carolina
Department of Neuro-ophthalmology, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK.
Department of Neuro-ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Neuroophthalmology. 2019 Oct 9;44(3):148-156. doi: 10.1080/01658107.2019.1660686. eCollection 2020 Jun.
There is a pressing need for a robust rating scale for ocular myasthenia gravis (OMG). Rating scales for myasthenia gravis (MG) research have a predominant focus on generalised disease. We present results of the first dedicated rating scale for OMG: the ocular myasthenia gravis rating scale (OMGRate). The OMGRate was developed through an international collaboration between neuromuscular and neuro-ophthalmology experts in OMG. It comprises two components: a physician- examination (OMGRate-e) and a patient questionnaire (OMGRate-q).. The OMGRate was prospectively validated in patients attending a neuro-ophthalmology clinic from April 2017 to October 2018. External validity and reliability of OMGRate were evaluated using validated MG rating scales: the Myasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC), the Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life (MG-QOL), and the ocular component from the Myasthenia Gravis Impairment Index questionnaire (MGII). Two hundred and eleven assessments were completed in 104 patients (67 males, mean age 55 y, range 18-86 y). There was very good external validity of the OMGRate: good correlation between OMGRate-e and MGC (r = 0.64, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.54-0.74, < .0001); excellent correlation between OMGRate-q and MGII (r = 0.85, 95% CI 0.78-0.91, < .0001) and good correlation between OMGRate and MG-QOL (r = 0.68, 95% CI 0.60-0.77, < .0001). A higher correlation of OMGRate and MG-QOL compared with MGC and MG-QOL (r = 0.47, 95% CI 0.34-0.59, < .0001) suggests that OMGRate is better able to capture significant QOL information in patients with OMG. It had excellent reliability with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.83 (95% CI 0.67-0.92). Feedback from examiners and patients indicated that the OMGRate was easy to use. In conclusion, OMGRate is an easy-to-use, valid and reliable rating scale for monitoring the severity of OMG.
对于眼肌型重症肌无力(OMG),迫切需要一种完善的评定量表。重症肌无力(MG)研究的评定量表主要侧重于全身性疾病。我们展示了首个专门针对OMG的评定量表的结果:眼肌型重症肌无力评定量表(OMGRate)。OMGRate是通过OMG领域的神经肌肉和神经眼科专家之间的国际合作开发的。它包括两个部分:医生检查(OMGRate - e)和患者问卷(OMGRate - q)。OMGRate在2017年4月至2018年10月期间到神经眼科门诊就诊的患者中进行了前瞻性验证。使用经过验证的MG评定量表评估OMGRate的外部效度和信度:重症肌无力综合量表(MGC)、重症肌无力生活质量量表(MG - QOL)以及重症肌无力损害指数问卷(MGII)中的眼部部分。对104例患者(67例男性,平均年龄55岁,范围18 - 86岁)完成了211次评估。OMGRate具有非常好的外部效度:OMGRate - e与MGC之间具有良好相关性(r = 0.64,95%置信区间[CI] 0.54 - 0.74,P <.0001);OMGRate - q与MGII之间具有极好的相关性(r = 0.85,95% CI 0.78 - 0.91,P <.0001),且OMGRate与MG - QOL之间具有良好相关性(r = 0.68,95% CI 0.60 - 0.77,P <.0001)。与MGC和MG - QOL相比,OMGRate与MG - QOL具有更高的相关性(r = 0.47,95% CI 0.34 - 0.59,P <.0001),这表明OMGRate能够更好地获取OMG患者的重要生活质量信息。它具有出色的信度,组内相关系数为0.83(95% CI 0.67 - 0.92)。检查人员和患者的反馈表明OMGRate易于使用。总之,OMGRate是一种易于使用、有效且可靠的评定量表,用于监测OMG的严重程度。