Wong Sui Hsien, Abuzaitoun Rebhi, Cornblath Wayne T, Eggenberger Eric R, Khanna Sangeeta, Deveney Tatiana, Ehrlich Joshua R, Andrews Chris A, Barnett-Tapia Carolina, De Lott Lindsey B
From the Department of Neuro-Ophthalmology (S.H.W.), Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust; Departments of Ophthalmology and Neurology (S.H.W.), Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust; Department of Ophthalmology (S.H.W.), Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London; Department of Clinical and Movement Neuroscience (S.H.W.), UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, United Kingdom; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences (R.A., W.T.C., T.D., J.R.E., C.A.A., L.B.D.L.), Kellogg Eye Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; Departments of Ophthalmology, Neurology, and Neurosurgery (E.R.E., S.K.), Mayo Clinic, FL; Survey Research Center (J.R.E.), Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; and Division of Neurology (C.B.-T.), Department of Medicine, University Health Network and University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Neurology. 2025 Jan 14;104(1):e210150. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000210150. Epub 2024 Dec 10.
Ocular myasthenia gravis (OMG) causes disabling ocular symptoms of ptosis and diplopia, but a validated disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) has not been reported. We sought to validate a novel PROM for OMG, OMG Rating Scale Questionnaire (OMGRate-q), as a measure of visual functioning to support patient-centered care.
This was a prospective study of patients aged 18 years and older with OMG receiving care at 3 medical centers (January 2022-October 2023). The 10-item OMGRate-q was administered, and response data were analyzed using exploratory factor analysis followed by Andrich rating scale model fitting. Poorly fitting items were eliminated, and the model was refit to produce the final items, item locations, and thresholds. Latent scores (theta) were estimated, test-retest reliability was established with repeat measures, and correlation with other myasthenia gravis PROMs was measured.
Of the 134 patients included in the study, 45 (33.6%) were women, 99 (73.9%) were White, and the median age (interquartile range [IQR]) was 64.6 years (52.6-73.9 years). A ptosis-related item showed significant item-trait deviation ( < 0.001) and was kept as a separate factor from the remaining diplopia-related items. After excluding this item, there were no misfitting items. Theta estimation for the diplopia scale ranged from -3.47 to 5.51 with median = -0.53 (IQR -2.33, 0.72). Test-retest reliability of the OMGRate-q diplopia subscale was high (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.95 [95% CI 0.90-0.98]) and of the ptosis item was good (weighted κ = 0.56). No significant differences were observed in OMGRate-q diplopia subscale scores or the ptosis item between the 3 sites (diplopia = 0.44; ptosis = 0.32). OMGRate-q scores were moderately to highly correlated with the Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life 15 questionnaire (n = 122; diplopia: = 0.68, < 0.001; ptosis: = 0.48, < 0.001) and Myasthenia Gravis Impairment Index (n = 130; diplopia: = 0.76, < 0.001; ptosis: = 0.77, < 0.001). OMGRate-q length was acceptable to most participants (125/130 [96.2%]), and the questionnaire was completed in 80.7 (±45.2) seconds.
The OMGRate-q is a valid and reliable disease-specific PROM for OMG that may be used to facilitate patient-centered research and care. However, the OMGRate-q emphasizes the impact of diplopia on visual functioning with a single separate item measuring ptosis. Future studies are needed to determine OMGRate-q responsiveness to disease-state changes and how to add measures of ptosis to this scale or whether a separate measure is needed.
眼肌型重症肌无力(OMG)会导致上睑下垂和复视等使人致残的眼部症状,但尚未有经过验证的针对该疾病的患者报告结局指标(PROM)。我们试图验证一种用于OMG的新型PROM,即OMG评分量表问卷(OMGRate-q),作为衡量视觉功能的指标,以支持以患者为中心的护理。
这是一项对年龄在18岁及以上、在3个医疗中心接受治疗的OMG患者进行的前瞻性研究(2022年1月至2023年10月)。发放了包含10个条目的OMGRate-q,并使用探索性因素分析对回答数据进行分析,随后进行安德里奇评分量表模型拟合。剔除拟合不佳的条目,重新拟合模型以得出最终的条目、条目位置和阈值。估计潜在分数(θ),通过重复测量确定重测信度,并测量与其他重症肌无力PROM的相关性。
该研究纳入的134例患者中,45例(33.6%)为女性,99例(73.9%)为白人,中位年龄(四分位间距[IQR])为64.6岁(52.6 - 73.9岁)。一个与上睑下垂相关的条目显示出显著的条目 - 特质偏差(<0.001),并被作为与其余复视相关条目分开的一个因素保留。剔除该条目后,没有拟合不佳的条目。复视量表的θ估计范围为 - 3.47至5.51,中位数 = - 0.53(IQR - 2.33,0.72)。OMGRate-q复视子量表的重测信度较高(组内相关系数 = 0.95[95%CI 0.90 - 0.98]),上睑下垂条目的重测信度良好(加权κ = 0.56)。在3个研究地点之间,OMGRate-q复视子量表得分或上睑下垂条目未观察到显著差异(复视:P = 0.44;上睑下垂:P = 0.32)。OMGRate-q得分与重症肌无力生活质量15问卷(n = 122;复视:r = 0.68,P < 0.001;上睑下垂:r = 0.48,P < 0.001)以及重症肌无力损伤指数(n = 130;复视:r = 0.76,P < 0.001;上睑下垂:r = 0.77,P < 0.001)呈中度至高度相关。大多数参与者认为OMGRate-q的长度是可接受的(125/130[96.2%]),问卷完成时间为80.7(±45.2)秒。
OMGRate-q是一种用于OMG的有效且可靠的针对该疾病的PROM,可用于促进以患者为中心的研究和护理。然而,OMGRate-q强调复视对视觉功能的影响,仅用一个单独条目测量上睑下垂。未来需要进行研究以确定OMGRate-q对疾病状态变化的反应性,以及如何在该量表中增加上睑下垂的测量指标,或者是否需要单独的测量指标。