Janson Christer
Department of Medical Sciences: Respiratory, Allergy and Sleep Research, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
J Thorac Dis. 2020 Apr;12(4):1561-1569. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2020.02.51.
In chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), treatment with inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) in combination with long acting beta-2-agonists (LABA) or LABA/long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) is used in order to reduce exacerbations. Treatment with ICS is, however, associated with side effects such as oropharyngeal candidiasis, skin thinning or easy bruising and pneumonia. The aim of this review was to investigate when to use ICS in COPD and to compare the effectiveness and safety of different ICSs. Studies comparing the effect of ICS/LABA and LABA/LAMA on exacerbations have shown divergent results, whereas most studies comparing ICS/LABA/LAMA (triple therapy) with LABA/LAMA have reported fewer exacerbations with triple therapy. Several investigations have shown that the number of eosinophils in blood predicts whether a patient will benefit from treatment with ICS. There is also data indicating that ICS has a small but significant positive effect on lung function decline and decrease mortality. There are four observational studies showing a better effect on exacerbations with budesonide/formoterol than fluticasone propionate/salmeterol and three observational studies showing less risk of pneumonia with budesonide than fluticasone propionate. Studies comparing the effect and safety of other ICSs such as fluticasone furoate and beclomethasone are too few to draw firm conclusions from. In conclusion, ICS together with LABA or LABA/LAMA reduces the risk of exacerbations in COPD. The indication of using ICS in COPD is stronger if the patient has increased blood eosinophils levels. There are data indicating that the choice of ICS matters, with studies showing a better effect-safety profile with budesonide compared to fluticasone propionate whereas it is not possible to make benefit-risk comparisons between the other licensed ICSs.
在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)中,吸入性糖皮质激素(ICS)联合长效β2受体激动剂(LABA)或LABA/长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂(LAMA)用于减少急性加重。然而,ICS治疗会带来一些副作用,如口咽念珠菌病、皮肤变薄或易瘀伤以及肺炎。本综述的目的是研究COPD患者何时使用ICS,并比较不同ICS的有效性和安全性。比较ICS/LABA和LABA/LAMA对急性加重影响的研究结果存在分歧,而大多数比较ICS/LABA/LAMA(三联疗法)与LABA/LAMA的研究报告称三联疗法的急性加重次数较少。多项研究表明,血液中嗜酸性粒细胞的数量可预测患者是否能从ICS治疗中获益。也有数据表明,ICS对肺功能下降有微小但显著的积极影响,并能降低死亡率。有四项观察性研究表明,布地奈德/福莫特罗对急性加重的疗效优于丙酸氟替卡松/沙美特罗,还有三项观察性研究表明,布地奈德导致肺炎的风险低于丙酸氟替卡松。比较其他ICS如糠酸氟替卡松和倍氯米松的疗效和安全性的研究太少,无法得出确凿结论。总之,ICS联合LABA或LABA/LAMA可降低COPD急性加重的风险。如果患者血液嗜酸性粒细胞水平升高,在COPD中使用ICS的指征更强。有数据表明,ICS的选择很重要,研究表明与丙酸氟替卡松相比,布地奈德的疗效-安全性更好,而其他已获许可的ICS之间无法进行获益-风险比较。