Suppr超能文献

气味诱饵对相机陷阱检测的影响因哺乳动物捕食者和猎物物种的不同而不同。

Effects of scent lure on camera trap detections vary across mammalian predator and prey species.

机构信息

Department of Forest Resources Management, Wildlife Coexistence Lab, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 May 12;15(5):e0229055. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229055. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Camera traps are a unique survey tool used to monitor a wide variety of mammal species. Camera trap (CT) data can be used to estimate animal distribution, density, and behaviour. Attractants, such as scent lures, are often used in an effort to increase CT detections; however, the degree which the effects of attractants vary across species is not well understood. We investigated the effects of scent lure on mammal detections by comparing detection rates between 404 lured and 440 unlured CT stations sampled in Alberta, Canada over 120 day survey periods between February and August in 2015 and 2016. We used zero-inflated negative binomial generalized linear mixed models to test the effect of lure on detection rates for a) all mammals, b) six functional groups (all predator species, all prey, large carnivores, small carnivores, small mammals, ungulates), and c) four varied species of management interest (fisher, Pekania pennanti; gray wolf, Canis lupus; moose, Alces alces; and Richardson's ground squirrel; Urocitellus richardsonii). Mammals were detected at 800 of the 844 CTs, with nearly equal numbers of total detections at CTs with (7110) and without (7530) lure, and variable effects of lure on groups and individual species. Scent lure significantly increased detections of predators as a group, including large and small carnivore sub-groups and fisher specifically, but not of gray wolf. There was no effect of scent lure on detections of prey species, including the small mammal and ungulate sub-groups and moose and Richardson's ground squirrel specifically. We recommend that researchers explicitly consider the variable effects of scent lure on CT detections across species when designing, interpreting, or comparing multi-species surveys. Additional research is needed to further quantify variation in species responses to scent lures and other attractants, and to elucidate the effect of attractants on community-level inferences from camera trap surveys.

摘要

相机陷阱是一种独特的调查工具,用于监测多种哺乳动物物种。相机陷阱 (CT) 数据可用于估计动物的分布、密度和行为。诱饵,如气味引诱剂,常被用来增加 CT 检测的数量;然而,吸引剂对不同物种的效果变化程度还没有被很好地理解。我们通过比较 2015 年和 2016 年 2 月至 8 月期间 120 天的调查期间在加拿大艾伯塔省采集的 404 个有诱饵和 440 个无诱饵的 CT 站的检测率,来研究气味诱饵对哺乳动物检测的影响。我们使用零膨胀负二项式广义线性混合模型来测试诱饵对以下方面的影响:a) 所有哺乳动物,b) 六个功能组(所有捕食者物种、所有猎物、大型食肉动物、小型食肉动物、小型哺乳动物、有蹄类动物)和 c) 四种不同管理兴趣的物种(河狸, Castor canadensis;灰狼, Canis lupus;驼鹿, Alces alces;和草原犬鼠, Urocitellus richardsonii)。在 844 个 CT 中有 800 个检测到了哺乳动物,有诱饵和没有诱饵的 CT 总检测数量几乎相等,而且诱饵对群体和个别物种的影响也不同。气味诱饵显著增加了作为一个群体的捕食者的检测,包括大型和小型食肉动物亚群以及河狸,而不是灰狼。气味诱饵对猎物物种的检测没有影响,包括小型哺乳动物和有蹄类亚群以及驼鹿和草原犬鼠。我们建议研究人员在设计、解释或比较多物种调查时,明确考虑气味诱饵对 CT 检测的物种间的可变影响。需要进一步研究来进一步量化物种对气味诱饵和其他引诱剂的反应差异,并阐明引诱剂对从相机陷阱调查得出的群落水平推断的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e35b/7217433/c653331430bd/pone.0229055.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验