Suppr超能文献

挪威特伦马克基于人群的横断面研究评估哮喘控制不佳的可能危险因素。

Possible risk factors for poor asthma control assessed in a cross-sectional population-based study from Telemark, Norway.

机构信息

Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Telemark Hospital, Skien, Norway.

Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 May 12;15(5):e0232621. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232621. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

This cross-sectional study of the general population of Telemark County, Norway, aimed to identify risk factors associated with poor asthma control as defined by the Asthma Control Test (ACT), and to determine the proportions of patients with poorly controlled asthma who had undergone spirometry, used asthma medication, or been examined by a pulmonary physician. In 2014-2015, the study recruited 326 subjects aged 16-50 years who had self-reported physician-diagnosed asthma and presence of respiratory symptoms during the previous 12 months. The clinical outcome measures were body mass index (BMI), forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), immunoglobulin E (IgE) in serum and serum C-reactive protein (CRP). An ACT score ≤ 19 was defined as poorly controlled asthma. Overall, 113 subjects (35%) reported poor asthma control. The odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for factors associated with poorly controlled asthma were: self-reported occupational exposure to vapor, gas, dust, or fumes during the previous 12 months (OR 2.0; 95% CI 1.1-3.6), body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2 (OR 2.2; 95% CI 1.2-4.1), female sex (OR 2.6; 95% CI 1.5-4.7), current smoking (OR 2.8; 95% CI 1.5-5.3), and past smoking (OR 2.3; 95% CI 1.3-4.0). Poor asthma control was also associated with reduced FEV1 after bronchodilation (β -3.6; 95% CI -7.0 to -0.2). Moreover, 13% of the participants with poor asthma control reported no use of asthma medication, 51% had not been assessed by a pulmonary physician, and 20% had never undergone spirometry. Because these data are cross-sectional, further studies assessing possible risk factors in general and objectively measured occupational exposure in particular are needed. However, our results suggest that there is room for improvement with regards to use of spirometry and pulmonary physician referrals when a patient's asthma is inadequately controlled.

摘要

本横断面研究以挪威特伦马克县的一般人群为对象,旨在确定与哮喘控制测试(ACT)定义的哮喘控制不佳相关的危险因素,并确定接受过肺功能检查、使用过哮喘药物或接受过肺病医生检查的哮喘控制不佳患者的比例。2014-2015 年,该研究招募了 326 名年龄在 16-50 岁之间、自我报告有医生诊断的哮喘且在过去 12 个月内有呼吸道症状的患者。临床结局测量指标包括体重指数(BMI)、用力肺活量(FVC)和一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)、呼气末一氧化氮分数(FeNO)、血清免疫球蛋白 E(IgE)和血清 C 反应蛋白(CRP)。ACT 评分≤19 定义为哮喘控制不佳。总体而言,113 名患者(35%)报告哮喘控制不佳。与哮喘控制不佳相关的因素的比值比(OR)和 95%置信区间(CI)为:过去 12 个月报告职业性接触蒸气、气体、粉尘或烟雾(OR 2.0;95%CI 1.1-3.6)、BMI≥30kg/m2(OR 2.2;95%CI 1.2-4.1)、女性(OR 2.6;95%CI 1.5-4.7)、当前吸烟(OR 2.8;95%CI 1.5-5.3)和既往吸烟(OR 2.3;95%CI 1.3-4.0)。支气管扩张后 FEV1 下降(β-3.6;95%CI-7.0 至-0.2)也与哮喘控制不佳相关。此外,13%的哮喘控制不佳患者报告未使用哮喘药物,51%未接受肺病医生评估,20%从未进行过肺功能检查。由于这些数据是横断面的,需要进一步研究来评估一般情况下的可能危险因素,特别是客观测量的职业暴露。然而,我们的研究结果表明,在哮喘控制不佳的情况下,在使用肺功能检查和肺病医生转诊方面仍有改进的空间。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/173f/7217450/e117e9ff078a/pone.0232621.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验