Cruz Nuno, Martins Maria Inês, Domingos Santos José, Gil Mur Javier, Tondela João Paulo
Faculty of Dentistry, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, 08017 Barcelona, Spain.
Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto (FEUP), 4200-465 Porto, Portugal.
Materials (Basel). 2020 May 8;13(9):2177. doi: 10.3390/ma13092177.
The use of individualized titanium meshes has been referred to in scientific literature since 2011. There are many advantages to its use, however, the main complications are related to early or late exposures. As some aspects such as its surface properties have been pointed out to influence the soft tissue response, this study was designed to compare the surface characteristics of three commercially available individualized titanium meshes between them and according to the manufacturer's specifications. The results from the scanning electron microscopy, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction and the contact profilometry measurements were analyzed and cross-checked. It was discovered that, the BoneEasy's post-processing superficial treatment was more refined, as it delivers the mesh with the lowest Ra value, 0.61 ± 0.14 µm, due to the applied electropolishing. On the other hand, the Yxoss CBR mesh from ReOss was sandblasted, presenting an extremely rough surface with a Ra of 6.59 ± 0.76 µm.
自2011年以来，科学文献中就提及了个性化钛网的使用。其使用有诸多优点，然而，主要并发症与早期或晚期暴露有关。由于已指出其表面特性等一些方面会影响软组织反应，本研究旨在比较三种市售个性化钛网之间以及根据制造商规格的表面特征。对扫描电子显微镜、能量色散X射线光谱、X射线衍射和接触轮廓测量的结果进行了分析和交叉核对。结果发现，BoneEasy的后处理表面处理更为精细，因为通过应用电解抛光，其提供的网片具有最低的Ra值，为0.61±0.14µm。另一方面，ReOss的Yxoss CBR网片经过喷砂处理，呈现出极其粗糙的表面，Ra为6.59±0.76µm。
