Northern French Alp Emergency Network, Centre Hospitalier Annecy Genevois, 1, avenue de l'hopital - BP 90074, F-74374, Pringy, France.
Emergency Department, Lausanne University Hospital, CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2020 May 12;28(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s13049-020-00730-z.
Prompt prehospital triage and transportation are essential in an organised trauma system. The benefits of helicopter transportation on mortality in a physician-staffed pre-hospital trauma system remains unknown. The aim of the study was to assess the impact of helicopter transportation on mortality and prehospital triage.
Data collection was based on trauma registry for all consecutive major trauma patients transported by helicopter or ground ambulance in the Northern French Alps Trauma system between 2009 and 2017. The primary endpoint was in-hospital death. We performed multivariate logistic regression to compare death between helicopter and ground ambulance.
Overall, 9458 major trauma patients were included. 37% (n = 3524) were transported by helicopter, and 56% (n = 5253) by ground ambulance. Prehospital time from the first call to the arrival at hospital was longer in the helicopter group compared to the ground ambulance group, respectively median time 95 [72-124] minutes and 85 [63-113] minutes (P < 0.001). Median transport time was similar between groups, 20 min [13-30] for helicopter and 21 min [14-32] for ground ambulance. Using multivariate logistic regression, helicopter was associated with reduced mortality compared to ground ambulance (adjusted OR 0.70; 95% CI, 0.53-0.92; P = 0.01) and with reduced undertriage (OR 0.69 95% CI, 0.60-0.80; P < 0.001).
Helicopter was associated with reduced in-hospital death and undertriage by one third. It did not decrease prehospital and transport times in a system with the same crew using both helicopter or ground ambulance. The mortality and undertriage benefits observed suggest that the helicopter is the proper mode for long-distant transport to a regional trauma centre.
在有组织的创伤系统中,及时的院前分诊和转运至关重要。在配备医生的院前创伤系统中,直升机转运对死亡率的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估直升机转运对死亡率和院前分诊的影响。
数据收集基于 2009 年至 2017 年期间在法国北部阿尔卑斯山创伤系统中通过直升机或地面救护车连续转运的所有严重创伤患者的创伤登记处。主要终点是院内死亡。我们使用多变量逻辑回归比较直升机和地面救护车之间的死亡率。
共有 9458 例严重创伤患者纳入研究。37%(n=3524)通过直升机转运,56%(n=5253)通过地面救护车转运。与地面救护车组相比,直升机组从首次呼救到到达医院的院前时间更长,中位数分别为 95[72-124]分钟和 85[63-113]分钟(P<0.001)。两组的中位转运时间相似,直升机组为 20[13-30]分钟,地面救护车组为 21[14-32]分钟。使用多变量逻辑回归,与地面救护车相比,直升机与死亡率降低相关(调整后的 OR 0.70;95%CI,0.53-0.92;P=0.01),与分诊不足降低相关(OR 0.69;95%CI,0.60-0.80;P<0.001)。
直升机与院内死亡率降低和分诊不足减少三分之一相关。在同一机组使用直升机或地面救护车的系统中,它并未降低院前和转运时间。观察到的死亡率和分诊不足获益表明,直升机是向区域创伤中心长途转运的合适方式。