Ohayon M
Laboratoire de Traitement des Connaissances, Faculté de Médecine, Marseille.
Ann Med Psychol (Paris). 1988 Sep-Oct;146(9):779-814.
The disturbances of cognitive processes in psychotic patients are well known: the delusional interpretation is "the inference from a right perception into a wrong concept" (Dromard), "an wrong intuition about the meaning of what is perceived, seen or heard" (H. Ey). Analogy is the very core of any cognitive process: relating a strange thing to some object already part of the experience enables to set up differences, oppositions, connections, classes. Any semantic process (something stands for another thing) originates in analogy. It is the basis of every interpretation and world's knowledge. Its soundness is by no means reliable, but for the inner strength of the analogical network and its power to integrate new objects. It's easy to fall out of the track... A wrong analogy, better, a wrong one that would not be acknowledged as a mistake, would be enough: the gap is quite narrow between interpretations leading either to understanding or to misreading, only filled through the relation of other people providing the necessary clues. The contemporary papers about cognitive process are driving towards two main trends: 1) Neuromimetic models, and the building of neuronal networks, whose emergent properties point out the basically analogical character of representations, learning and memory. 2) Cognitive models, dealing with representations and algorithms, and leading to Artificial Intelligence Programs. We tried to build a model (both cognitive and AI) of the analogical process and its psychotic disturbances. Our model describes how simple analogical problems are solved: If (A) becomes (B), what about (C)? Making up the psychological model and its AI translation led to propound the concept of Universes as sets consisting of ONE likely or relevant link between two objects, and such intrinsic of extrinsic properties of the objects as are involved in this relation. The model uses 3 different universes: Universe U1, made up of one of the possible transformation kinks from (A) to (B) and (A)'s properties involved in this actual transformation. Universe U2, made out of the likeness link between Universe U1 and (C). Universe U3, performing in fact the validation procedure of the result. The analogical reasoning goes through the three universes, along an iterative loop again and again until a nice result is found.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
妄想性解释是“从正确感知到错误概念的推断”(德罗马尔),“对所感知、所见或所闻事物意义的错误直觉”(H. 埃伊)。类比是任何认知过程的核心:将一件陌生事物与经验中已有的某个对象联系起来,能够建立差异、对立、联系和类别。任何语义过程(某物代表另一物)都源于类比。它是所有解释和世界知识的基础。其合理性绝非可靠,而是取决于类比网络的内在强度及其整合新对象的能力。很容易偏离正轨……一个错误的类比,或者更确切地说,一个不被视为错误的错误类比就足够了:导致理解或误读的解释之间的差距非常小,只有通过他人提供必要线索的关系才能填补。当代关于认知过程的论文主要朝着两个趋势发展:1)神经模拟模型以及神经网络的构建,其涌现特性指出了表征、学习和记忆的基本类比特征。2)认知模型,处理表征和算法,并通向人工智能程序。我们试图构建一个类比过程及其精神病性紊乱的模型(包括认知模型和人工智能模型)。我们的模型描述了简单类比问题是如何解决的:如果(A)变成了(B),那么(C)呢?构建心理模型及其人工智能转换,促使我们提出了“宇宙”的概念,即由两个对象之间一个可能或相关的联系以及这种关系中所涉及的对象的此类内在或外在属性组成的集合。该模型使用3个不同的宇宙:宇宙U1,由从(A)到(B)的一种可能转换节点以及此实际转换中涉及的(A)的属性组成。宇宙U2,由宇宙U1与(C)之间的相似性联系构成。宇宙U3,实际上执行结果的验证程序。类比推理会反复经过这三个宇宙,沿着一个迭代循环,直到找到一个理想的结果。(摘要截选至400字)