Bojanic Christine, To Kendrick, Zhang Bridget, Mak Christopher, Khan Wasim S
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom.
Division of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom.
World J Stem Cells. 2020 Apr 26;12(4):288-302. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v12.i4.288.
Peripheral nerve injury can occur as a result of trauma or disease and carries significant morbidity including sensory and motor loss. The body has limited ability for nerve regeneration and functional recovery. Left untreated, nerve lesions can cause lifelong disability. Traditional treatment options such as neurorrhaphy and neurolysis have high failure rates. Surgical reconstruction with autograft carries donor site morbidity and often provide suboptimal results. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are known to have promising regenerative potential and have gained attention as a treatment option for nerve lesions. It is however, unclear whether it can be effectively used for nerve regeneration.
To evaluate the evidence for the use of human umbilical cord derived MSCs (UCMSCs) in peripheral nerve regeneration.
We carried out a systematic literature review in accordance with the PRISMA protocol. A literature search was performed from conception to September 2019 using PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science. The results of eligible studies were appraised. A risk of bias analysis was carried out using Cochrane's RoB 2.0 tool.
Fourteen studies were included in this review. A total of 279 subjects, including both human and animal were treated with UCMSCs. Four studies obtained UCMSCs from a third-party source and the remainder were harvested by the investigators. Out of the 14 studies, thirteen conducted xenogenic transplantation into nerve injury models. All studies reported significant improvement in nerve regeneration in the UCMSC treated groups compared with the various different controls and untreated groups.
The evidence summarised in this PRISMA systematic review of i studies supports the notion that human UCMSC transplantation is an effective treatment option for peripheral nerve injury.
外周神经损伤可由创伤或疾病引起,会导致包括感觉和运动丧失在内的严重发病率。机体神经再生和功能恢复的能力有限。若不治疗,神经损伤可导致终身残疾。传统治疗方法如神经缝合术和神经松解术失败率很高。自体移植进行手术重建会带来供体部位的发病率,且往往效果欠佳。间充质干细胞(MSCs)已知具有有前景的再生潜力,并作为神经损伤的一种治疗选择受到关注。然而,尚不清楚其是否能有效用于神经再生。
评估人脐带间充质干细胞(UCMSCs)用于外周神经再生的证据。
我们按照PRISMA方案进行了系统的文献综述。使用PubMed、EMBASE和科学网从创刊到2019年9月进行了文献检索。对符合条件的研究结果进行了评估。使用Cochrane的RoB 2.0工具进行了偏倚风险分析。
本综述纳入了14项研究。共有279名受试者,包括人和动物,接受了UCMSCs治疗。4项研究从第三方来源获得UCMSCs,其余由研究人员采集。在这14项研究中,有13项将其异种移植到神经损伤模型中。所有研究均报告,与各种不同对照组和未治疗组相比,UCMSC治疗组的神经再生有显著改善。
本PRISMA系统综述总结的证据支持以下观点,即人UCMSC移植是外周神经损伤的一种有效治疗选择。