• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无知循环:关于对蜜蜂有毒的农用化学品的未知是如何反复产生的。

Ignorance loops: How non-knowledge about bee-toxic agrochemicals is iteratively produced.

作者信息

Durant Jennie L

机构信息

University of California, Berkeley, USA.

出版信息

Soc Stud Sci. 2020 Oct;50(5):751-777. doi: 10.1177/0306312720923390. Epub 2020 May 13.

DOI:10.1177/0306312720923390
PMID:32400285
Abstract

In this article, I examine the knowledge politics around pesticides in the United States and the role it plays in honey bee declines. Since 2006, US beekeepers have lost an average of one-third of their colonies each year. Though a number of factors influence bee health, beekeepers, researchers and policymakers cite pesticides as a primary contributor. In the US, pesticide registration is overseen by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), with the required tests conducted by chemical companies applying for registration. Until 2016, the EPA only required chemical companies to measure acute toxicity for non-target species, which means that many pesticides with sublethal toxicities are not labeled bee-toxic, and farmers can apply them without penalty while bees are on their farms or orchards. In addition, California state and county regulators will typically only investigate a bee kill caused by a labeled bee-toxic pesticide, and so emergent data on non-labeled, sublethal pesticides goes uncollected. These gaps in data collection frustrate beekeepers and disincentivize them from reporting colony losses to regulatory agencies - thus reinforcing ignorance about which chemicals are toxic to bees. I term the iterative cycle of non-knowledge co-constituted by regulatory shortfalls and stakeholder regulatory disengagement an 'ignorance loop'. I conclude with a discussion of what this dynamic can tell us about the politics of knowledge production and pesticide governance and the consequences of 'ignorance loops' for stakeholders and the environment.

摘要

在本文中,我研究了美国围绕农药的知识政治及其在蜜蜂数量减少中所起的作用。自2006年以来,美国养蜂人每年平均损失三分之一的蜂群。尽管有许多因素影响蜜蜂健康,但养蜂人、研究人员和政策制定者都将农药视为主要因素。在美国,农药注册由美国环境保护局(EPA)监管,所需测试由申请注册的化学公司进行。直到2016年,EPA只要求化学公司测量对非目标物种的急性毒性,这意味着许多具有亚致死毒性的农药没有被标记为对蜜蜂有毒,农民可以在蜜蜂在其农场或果园时使用这些农药而不受处罚。此外,加利福尼亚州和各县的监管机构通常只会调查由标记为对蜜蜂有毒的农药导致的蜜蜂死亡,因此关于未标记的亚致死农药的新数据未被收集。数据收集方面的这些差距让养蜂人感到沮丧,并使他们不愿向监管机构报告蜂群损失——从而加剧了对哪些化学物质对蜜蜂有毒的无知。我将由监管不足和利益相关者监管脱节共同构成的非知识迭代循环称为“无知循环”。最后,我讨论了这种动态关系能告诉我们关于知识生产政治和农药治理的哪些内容,以及“无知循环”对利益相关者和环境的影响。

相似文献

1
Ignorance loops: How non-knowledge about bee-toxic agrochemicals is iteratively produced.无知循环:关于对蜜蜂有毒的农用化学品的未知是如何反复产生的。
Soc Stud Sci. 2020 Oct;50(5):751-777. doi: 10.1177/0306312720923390. Epub 2020 May 13.
2
Comprehensive Survey of Area-Wide Agricultural Pesticide Use in Southern United States Row Crops and Potential Impact on Honey Bee Colonies.美国南部大田作物区域农业杀虫剂使用情况综合调查及其对蜂群的潜在影响
Insects. 2019 Sep 2;10(9):280. doi: 10.3390/insects10090280.
3
High levels of miticides and agrochemicals in North American apiaries: implications for honey bee health.北美的养蜂场中存在高浓度的杀螨剂和农用化学品:对蜜蜂健康的影响。
PLoS One. 2010 Mar 19;5(3):e9754. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009754.
4
Metabolomics unveils the influence of dietary phytochemicals on residual pesticide concentrations in honey bees.代谢组学揭示了膳食植物化学物质对蜂蜜中残留农药浓度的影响。
Environ Int. 2021 Jul;152:106503. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106503. Epub 2021 Mar 20.
5
Seek and you shall find: An assessment of the influence of the analytical methodologies on pesticide occurrences in honey bee-collected pollen with a systematic review.有求必应:系统综述评估分析方法对蜜蜂采集花粉中农药残留的影响。
Chemosphere. 2020 Nov;258:127358. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127358. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
6
The formulation makes the honey bee poison.这种配方制造出了蜜蜂毒液。
Pestic Biochem Physiol. 2015 May;120:27-35. doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2014.12.026. Epub 2015 Jan 5.
7
Honey Bee (Apis mellifera) Exposure to Pesticide Residues in Nectar and Pollen in Urban and Suburban Environments from Four Regions of the United States.美国四个地区城市和郊区环境中蜜蜂(意大利蜜蜂)接触花蜜和花粉中农药残留的情况。
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2022 Apr;41(4):991-1003. doi: 10.1002/etc.5298. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
8
Mechanistic modeling of pesticide exposure: The missing keystone of honey bee toxicology.农药暴露的机制建模:蜜蜂毒理学中缺失的关键要素。
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2017 Apr;36(4):871-881. doi: 10.1002/etc.3661. Epub 2016 Dec 16.
9
Pesticide Exposure Assessment Paradigm for Stingless Bees.无刺蜂的农药暴露评估范式
Environ Entomol. 2019 Feb 13;48(1):36-48. doi: 10.1093/ee/nvy137.
10
Does the Honey Bee "Risk Cup" Runneth Over? Estimating Aggregate Exposures for Assessing Pesticide Risks to Honey Bees in Agroecosystems.蜜蜂的“风险杯”是否已满?估算农业生态系统中评估农药对蜜蜂风险的综合暴露量。
J Agric Food Chem. 2016 Jan 13;64(1):13-20. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.5b01067. Epub 2015 May 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Acute Toxicity of Fungicide-Insecticide-Adjuvant Combinations Applied to Almonds During Bloom on Adult Honey Bees.杀菌剂-杀虫剂-助剂组合在杏仁开花期对成年蜜蜂的急性毒性。
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2022 Apr;41(4):1042-1053. doi: 10.1002/etc.5297. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
2
Pollen nutrition fosters honeybee tolerance to pesticides.花粉营养增强蜜蜂对杀虫剂的耐受性。
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Sep 1;8(9):210818. doi: 10.1098/rsos.210818. eCollection 2021 Sep.