Christie Hannah Liane, Schichel Mignon Chloë Philomela, Tange Huibert Johannes, Veenstra Marja Yvonne, Verhey Frans Rochus Josef, de Vugt Marjolein Elizabeth
Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology and Alzheimer Centre Limburg, School for Mental Health and Neurosciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht, Netherlands.
JMIR Aging. 2020 May 13;3(1):e17255. doi: 10.2196/17255.
Very few evidence-based electronic health (eHealth) interventions for caregivers of people with dementia are implemented into practice. As part of a cross-border collaboration focusing on dementia and depression in older people, two eHealth interventions for caregivers of people with dementia ("Myinlife" and "Partner in Balance") were adopted by nine municipalities in the Euregion Meuse-Rhine.
This study aimed to (1) identify determinants for the implementation of eHealth interventions for caregivers of people with dementia in a municipality context and (2) formulate implementation strategies for these interventions.
Eight municipality officials were interviewed using open-ended, semistructured interviews about their background, thoughts on the implementation of the intervention, recommended strategies, and thoughts on eHealth in general. One additional municipality discontinued the implementation project and submitted answers to the interview questions via email. The interviews were transcribed and independently analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.
The interviews provided information on the perspectives of municipality officials on implementing eHealth for caregivers of people with dementia in their local communities. Key findings from the inductive thematic analysis included the importance of face-to-face interviews in developing tailor-made implementation plans, the need for regular meetings, the enthusiasm of municipality officials to implement these interventions, the need for long-term sustainability planning through collecting data on the required resources and benefits, and the effect of name brand recognition in adoption.
The findings contribute toward filling the previously identified gap in the literature on the implementation context of eHealth interventions for caregivers of people with dementia. Municipality officials' views indicated which implementation determinants they expected would influence the adoption, dissemination, and future implementation of eHealth interventions for caregivers of people with dementia in a municipal context. These insights were applied to tailored implementation strategies to facilitate the future implementation of interventions such as Myinlife and Partner in Balance.
针对痴呆症患者照护者的循证电子健康(eHealth)干预措施在实际中很少得到应用。作为一项聚焦老年人痴呆症和抑郁症的跨境合作项目的一部分,默兹 - 莱茵欧洲地区的9个城市采用了两项针对痴呆症患者照护者的eHealth干预措施(“Myinlife”和“平衡伙伴”)。
本研究旨在(1)确定在城市环境中实施针对痴呆症患者照护者的eHealth干预措施的决定因素,以及(2)制定这些干预措施的实施策略。
对8名城市官员进行了开放式、半结构化访谈,内容涉及他们的背景、对干预措施实施的看法、推荐的策略以及对eHealth的总体看法。另有一个城市停止了实施项目,并通过电子邮件提交了对访谈问题的回答。对访谈进行了转录,并采用归纳主题分析法进行独立分析。
访谈提供了城市官员对在当地社区为痴呆症患者照护者实施eHealth的看法。归纳主题分析的主要发现包括面对面访谈在制定量身定制的实施计划中的重要性、定期会议的必要性、城市官员实施这些干预措施的积极性、通过收集所需资源和效益数据进行长期可持续性规划的必要性,以及品牌认知在采用过程中的作用。
这些发现有助于填补先前在文献中确定的针对痴呆症患者照护者的eHealth干预措施实施背景方面的空白。城市官员的观点表明了他们预期哪些实施决定因素会影响在城市环境中针对痴呆症患者照护者的eHealth干预措施的采用、传播和未来实施。这些见解被应用于量身定制的实施策略,以促进未来诸如“Myinlife”和“平衡伙伴”等干预措施的实施。