a Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Psychology , University of Adelaide , Adelaide , Australia.
Aging Ment Health. 2018 Nov;22(11):1395-1405. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2017.1370689. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
To quantitatively review the literature comparing depressed mood, anxiety and psychological distress in caregivers (CGs) of older adults with Alzheimer's disease (AD) with non-caregivers (NCGs) Methods: Eighteen independent studies comparing AD CGs (N = 2378) with NCGs (N = 70,035) were evaluated in accordance with the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines. Standardised mean differences (Hedges' g) with associated 95% confidence intervals and p-values were calculated using a random-effects model.
Studies generally conformed to STROBE criteria in terms of their methodological and procedural detail, although data management issues that may contribute to methodological bias were identified. Pooled effect estimates revealed medium to large group differences in depression (g = 1.01 [CI: 0.73, 1.29] p < 0.01) and anxiety (g = 0.64 [CI: 0.39, 0.89] p < 0.01): AD caregivers reported higher symptom severity. Gender was a significant moderator: female caregivers experienced poor self-reported mood (g = 1.58 [CI: 1.11, 2.05], p < 0.01), although this analysis was limited in power given the small number of contributing studies.
Caregivers of patients with AD experience poor mental health in comparison to the general population, with female caregivers being disproportionately affected. Further exploration of the psychosocial variables that contribute to these group differences is needed to inform effective support services and, in turn, help caregivers manage the emotional demands of AD.
定量综述比较阿尔茨海默病(AD)老年患者照顾者(CGs)与非照顾者(NCGs)抑郁情绪、焦虑和心理困扰的文献。
根据《观察性研究的报告规范》(STROBE)准则,评估了 18 项比较 AD CG(N=2378)与 NCG(N=70035)的独立研究。使用随机效应模型计算标准化均数差(Hedges'g)及其相关 95%置信区间和 p 值。
研究在方法学和程序细节方面通常符合 STROBE 标准,但也发现了可能导致方法学偏差的数据管理问题。汇总的效应估计显示,抑郁(g=1.01 [CI:0.73,1.29] p<0.01)和焦虑(g=0.64 [CI:0.39,0.89] p<0.01)方面存在较大的组间差异:AD 照顾者报告的症状严重程度更高。性别是一个显著的调节因素:女性照顾者自我报告的情绪较差(g=1.58 [CI:1.11,2.05],p<0.01),但由于参与研究的数量较少,该分析的效力有限。
与一般人群相比,AD 患者的照顾者经历较差的心理健康,女性照顾者受影响的程度不成比例。需要进一步探讨导致这些组间差异的心理社会变量,以为有效的支持服务提供信息,并进而帮助照顾者应对 AD 的情感需求。