Universidad de Monterrey, Escuela de Medicina, Especialidades Médicas, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico.
Departamento de Medicina Interna, Hospital Christus Muguerza Alta Especialidad, Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico.
PLoS One. 2020 May 13;15(5):e0232657. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232657. eCollection 2020.
The electrocardiogram (ECG) is the most common tool used to predict left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). However, it is limited by its low accuracy (<60%) and sensitivity (30%). We set forth the hypothesis that the Machine Learning (ML) C5.0 algorithm could optimize the ECG in the prediction of LVH by echocardiography (Echo) while also establishing ECG-LVH phenotypes. We used Echo as the standard diagnostic tool to detect LVH and measured the ECG abnormalities found in Echo-LVH. We included 432 patients (power = 99%). Of these, 202 patients (46.7%) had Echo-LVH and 240 (55.6%) were males. We included a wide range of ventricular masses and Echo-LVH severities which were classified as mild (n = 77, 38.1%), moderate (n = 50, 24.7%) and severe (n = 75, 37.1%). Data was divided into a training/testing set (80%/20%) and we applied logistic regression analysis on the ECG measurements. The logistic regression model with the best ability to identify Echo-LVH was introduced into the C5.0 ML algorithm. We created multiple decision trees and selected the tree with the highest performance. The resultant five-level binary decision tree used only six predictive variables and had an accuracy of 71.4% (95%CI, 65.5-80.2), a sensitivity of 79.6%, specificity of 53%, positive predictive value of 66.6% and a negative predictive value of 69.3%. Internal validation reached a mean accuracy of 71.4% (64.4-78.5). Our results were reproduced in a second validation group and a similar diagnostic accuracy was obtained, 73.3% (95%CI, 65.5-80.2), sensitivity (81.6%), specificity (69.3%), positive predictive value (56.3%) and negative predictive value (88.6%). We calculated the Romhilt-Estes multilevel score and compared it to our model. The accuracy of the Romhilt-Estes system had an accuracy of 61.3% (CI95%, 56.5-65.9), a sensitivity of 23.2% and a specificity of 94.8% with similar results in the external validation group. In conclusion, the C5.0 ML algorithm surpassed the accuracy of current ECG criteria in the detection of Echo-LVH. Our new criteria hinge on ECG abnormalities that identify high-risk patients and provide some insight on electrogenesis in Echo-LVH.
心电图(ECG)是预测左心室肥厚(LVH)最常用的工具。然而,它的准确性(<60%)和灵敏度(30%)有限。我们提出假设,机器学习(ML)C5.0 算法可以通过超声心动图(Echo)优化心电图在 LVH 预测中的作用,同时建立心电图-LVH 表型。我们使用 Echo 作为标准诊断工具来检测 LVH,并测量在 Echo-LVH 中发现的心电图异常。我们纳入了 432 名患者(功率=99%)。其中,202 名患者(46.7%)有 Echo-LVH,240 名患者(55.6%)为男性。我们纳入了广泛的心室质量和 Echo-LVH 严重程度,分为轻度(n=77,38.1%)、中度(n=50,24.7%)和重度(n=75,37.1%)。数据分为训练/测试集(80%/20%),我们对心电图测量值进行逻辑回归分析。将识别 Echo-LVH 能力最佳的逻辑回归模型引入 C5.0 ML 算法。我们创建了多个决策树,并选择性能最佳的树。最终的五级二分决策树仅使用了六个预测变量,准确率为 71.4%(95%CI,65.5-80.2),灵敏度为 79.6%,特异性为 53%,阳性预测值为 66.6%,阴性预测值为 69.3%。内部验证的平均准确率为 71.4%(64.4-78.5)。我们的结果在第二个验证组中得到了重现,并且获得了类似的诊断准确性,为 73.3%(95%CI,65.5-80.2),灵敏度为 81.6%,特异性为 69.3%,阳性预测值为 56.3%,阴性预测值为 88.6%。我们计算了 Romhilt-Estes 多级评分,并将其与我们的模型进行了比较。Romhilt-Estes 系统的准确率为 61.3%(CI95%,56.5-65.9),灵敏度为 23.2%,特异性为 94.8%,在外部验证组中也得到了类似的结果。总之,C5.0 ML 算法在检测 Echo-LVH 方面超过了当前心电图标准的准确性。我们的新标准基于可识别高危患者的心电图异常,并为 Echo-LVH 中的电生成提供了一些见解。