Fields W S, Lemak N A, Frankowski R F, Hardy R J
Stroke. 1977 May-Jun;8(3):301-14. doi: 10.1161/01.str.8.3.301.
Adouble-blind trial of aspirin for the treatment of cerebral ischemia was begun in 1972 and continued for 37 months. This was accomplished despite difficulties in controlling a long-term study of a drug which has widespread availability and consumption. The study design, criteria for selection of patients, follow-up surveillance, and methods of data analysis are presented. We report only subjects without carotid surgery before randomization. Patients (178) who had carotid transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) were randomly allocated to aspirin or placebo and followed to determine the incidence of subsequent TIAs,death, cerebral infarction or retinal infarction. Analysis of the first six months of follow-up revealed a statistically significant differential in favar of aspirin when death or cerebral or retinal infarction and the occurrence of TIAs were grouped and considered together as end points. Significance in favor of aspirin treatment was mainly revealed in patients with a history of multiple TIAs and was most evident in those individuals having carotid lesions appropriate to the TIA symptoms. It cannot be inferred from this study that aspirin prevents stroke because when end points were restriced to death or cerebral or retinal infarction, there was no statistically significant differential between the aspirin and placebo treatments.
一项关于阿司匹林治疗脑缺血的双盲试验于1972年开始,持续了37个月。尽管在对一种广泛可得且使用的药物进行长期研究时存在控制方面的困难,但该试验仍得以完成。文中介绍了研究设计、患者选择标准、随访监测以及数据分析方法。我们仅报告随机分组前未接受颈动脉手术的受试者。178例有颈动脉短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)的患者被随机分配至阿司匹林组或安慰剂组,并进行随访以确定随后发生TIA、死亡、脑梗死或视网膜梗死的发生率。对随访前六个月的分析显示,当将死亡、脑梗死或视网膜梗死以及TIA的发生作为终点进行综合考虑时,阿司匹林组在统计学上有显著差异。阿司匹林治疗的优势主要体现在有多次TIA病史的患者中,在那些有与TIA症状相符的颈动脉病变的个体中最为明显。从这项研究不能推断出阿司匹林可预防中风,因为当终点仅限于死亡、脑梗死或视网膜梗死时,阿司匹林组与安慰剂组之间在统计学上没有显著差异。