Suppr超能文献

农村危地马拉人群的妊娠间隔:来自质量改进数据库的结果。

Interpregnancy Interval in a Rural Guatemalan Population: Results from a Quality Improvement Database.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.

, Academic Office 1, 12631 E. 17th Avenue, Rm 4211, Mail Stop B198-2, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.

出版信息

Matern Child Health J. 2020 Aug;24(8):1038-1046. doi: 10.1007/s10995-020-02954-y.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This analysis describes the interpregnancy interval (time from livebirth to subsequent conception) in a convenience sample of women living in Southwest Guatemala and the association of antepartum characteristics and postpartum outcomes with a short interpregnancy interval (< 24 months).

METHODS

This is an observational study of a convenience sample of women enrolled in the Madres Sanas community antenatal/postnatal nursing program supported by the Center for Human Development in Southwest Trifinio, Guatemala, between October 1, 2018 and October 1, 2019. We observed the distribution of interpregnancy intervals among the population of women with a reported date of last live birth, and used bivariate comparisons to compare women with a short interpregnancy interval (< 24 months) to those with an optimal interval ([Formula: see text] 24 months) by antepartum, obstetric and delivery, and postpartum outcomes.

RESULTS

171 parous women enrolled in the Madres Sanas program between October 1, 2018 and October 1, 2019, and reported the date of their last live birth. One hundred-forty-one (82.5%) women delivered and 130 of those women (92.2%) were seen for their 40-day postpartum visit. The mean interval was 37.1 months with a 22.1-month standard deviation. The median interval was 33.7 months with an interquartile range of 19.6-49.5 months. Among these women, 113 (66.1%) the interpregnancy interval was at least 24 months. The only covariate of all sociodemographic, obstetric and antepartum, delivery, and postpartum characteristics that differed between women who achieved an interval ([Formula: see text] 24 months) compared to those that did not (< 24 months), was age (median 22.9, interquartile range (IQR) [19.1,27.0] vs median 24.8, IQR [21.6,27.9], respectively, p = 0.006). A regression model found that with each increasing year of age, the interpregnancy interval increases by 1.08 months, p = 0.025.

CONCLUSION

Among parous women, two-thirds of women space pregnancies at least 24 months. Older women were more likely to have a longer interval between live births.

摘要

目的

本分析描述了居住在危地马拉西南部的便利样本中的女性的产后间隔(从活产到后续妊娠的时间),以及产前特征和产后结局与短产后间隔(<24 个月)的关系。

方法

这是一项观察性研究,对 2018 年 10 月 1 日至 2019 年 10 月 1 日期间参加由危地马拉西南部三特里尼奥中心支持的 Madres Sanas 社区产前/产后护理项目的便利样本中的女性进行观察。我们观察了报告最后一次活产日期的女性中产后间隔的分布,并使用双变量比较比较了短产后间隔(<24 个月)的女性与最佳间隔([Formula: see text] 24 个月)的女性,比较了产前、产科和分娩以及产后结局。

结果

171 名经产妇参加了 2018 年 10 月 1 日至 2019 年 10 月 1 日的 Madres Sanas 项目,并报告了最后一次活产日期。141 名妇女分娩,其中 130 名妇女(92.2%)在产后 40 天进行了产后检查。平均间隔为 37.1 个月,标准差为 22.1 个月。中位数间隔为 33.7 个月,四分位间距为 19.6-49.5 个月。在这些女性中,113 名(66.1%)产后间隔至少为 24 个月。在达到间隔[Formula: see text] 24 个月的女性与未达到间隔(<24 个月)的女性之间,所有社会人口学、产科和产前、分娩和产后特征中唯一的协变量是年龄(中位数 22.9,四分位间距(IQR)[19.1,27.0]与中位数 24.8,IQR [21.6,27.9],p=0.006)。回归模型发现,每增加 1 岁,产后间隔增加 1.08 个月,p=0.025。

结论

在经产妇中,三分之二的女性将怀孕间隔至少 24 个月。年龄较大的女性更有可能在活产之间有更长的间隔。

相似文献

1
Interpregnancy Interval in a Rural Guatemalan Population: Results from a Quality Improvement Database.
Matern Child Health J. 2020 Aug;24(8):1038-1046. doi: 10.1007/s10995-020-02954-y.
3
Coverage of immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception has improved birth intervals for at-risk populations.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Apr;222(4S):S886.e1-S886.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.11.1282. Epub 2019 Dec 14.
4
Within-Family Analysis of Interpregnancy Interval and Adverse Birth Outcomes.
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Dec;130(6):1304-1311. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002358.
6
Interpregnancy Interval and Singleton Live Birth Outcomes From In Vitro Fertilization.
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jul;132(1):115-121. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002644.
7
Association of Short Interpregnancy Interval With Pregnancy Outcomes According to Maternal Age.
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Dec 1;178(12):1661-1670. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4696.
8
Association between interpregnancy interval and adverse birth outcomes in women with a previous stillbirth: an international cohort study.
Lancet. 2019 Apr 13;393(10180):1527-1535. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32266-9. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
9
Short interpregnancy intervals in the United States.
Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jul;122(1):64-71. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182955e58.

本文引用的文献

1
Mode of delivery among women with a history of prior cesarean in rural Guatemala: Results from a quality improvement database.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Feb;245:212-215. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.12.014. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
2
Short interpregnancy intervals and adverse pregnancy outcomes by maternal age in the United States.
Ann Epidemiol. 2019 Mar;31:38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.12.002. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
3
Association of Short Interpregnancy Interval With Pregnancy Outcomes According to Maternal Age.
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Dec 1;178(12):1661-1670. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4696.
5
The Center for Human Development in Guatemala: An Innovative Model for Global Population Health.
Adv Pediatr. 2016 Aug;63(1):357-87. doi: 10.1016/j.yapd.2016.04.001. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
6
Birth spacing and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes: a meta-analysis.
JAMA. 2006 Apr 19;295(15):1809-23. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.15.1809.
7
Effect of the interpregnancy interval on perinatal outcomes in Latin America.
Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Aug;106(2):359-66. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000171118.79529.a3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验