Zürich, Switzerland.
J Anal Psychol. 2020 Jun;65(3):519-537. doi: 10.1111/1468-5922.12598.
This is the second part of an article that tries to provide a framework of understanding of, and a seminal reflection on, a highly interesting yet little explored psychological construct of Jung's analytical psychology, namely the 'mana personality'. Here I take into consideration some issues around the 'saviour complex', discussed in Jung's seminar on Nietzsche's Zarathustra, concerning both the psychological analysis of the individual and the socio-political level related to the collective horizon of the 1930s. Moreover, I consider the continuity of Jung's analysis of such issues in other works such as 'Psychology and national problems' (1936), Symbols of Transformation (1952), and Aion (1950). I finally make some suggestions concerning Jung's apparent hermeneutic tendency to apply the construct of the mana personality to collective historical phenomena.
这是一篇文章的第二部分，该文试图提供一个理解和反思荣格分析心理学中一个非常有趣但鲜有人探索的心理结构的框架，即“曼纳人格”。在这里，我考虑了一些围绕荣格关于尼采《查拉图斯特拉如是说》的研讨会上讨论的“救世主情结”的问题，这些问题涉及个体的心理分析和与 20 世纪 30 年代集体视野相关的社会政治层面。此外，我还考虑了荣格在其他作品（如《心理学与民族问题》（1936 年）、《转化的象征》（1952 年）和《阿尼玛》（1950 年）中对这些问题的分析的连续性。最后，我就荣格明显的解释学倾向，即将曼纳人格的结构应用于集体历史现象，提出了一些建议。
Zotero 插件