• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

群体免疫与接种博弈:一项实验研究。

Herd immunity and a vaccination game: An experimental study.

机构信息

Department of Economics, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

Department of Economics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 May 14;15(5):e0232652. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232652. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0232652
PMID:32407329
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7224512/
Abstract

Would the affected communities voluntarily obtain herd immunity if a cure for COVID-19 was available? This paper experimentally investigates people's vaccination choices in the context of a nonlinear public good game. A "vaccination game" is defined in which costly commitments (vaccination) are required of a fraction of the population to reach the critical level needed for herd immunity, without which defectors are punished by the natural contagion of epidemics. Our experimental implementation of a vaccination game in a controlled laboratory setting reveals that endogenous epidemic punishment is a credible threat, resulting in voluntary vaccination to obtain herd immunity, for which the orthodox principle of positive externalities fails to account. The concave nature of the infection probability plays a key role in facilitating the elimination of an epidemic.

摘要

如果有治疗 COVID-19 的方法,受影响的社区会自愿获得群体免疫吗?本文在非线性公共物品博弈的背景下,通过实验研究了人们的疫苗接种选择。定义了一个“疫苗接种游戏”,其中需要一部分人付出代价(接种疫苗)来达到达到群体免疫所需的关键水平,如果不这样做,未接种疫苗的人将受到传染病自然传播的惩罚。我们在受控实验室环境中对疫苗接种游戏的实验实施表明,内生传染病惩罚是一种可信的威胁,导致人们自愿接种疫苗以获得群体免疫,而这一点无法用正统的正外部性原则来解释。感染概率的凹性在促进传染病的消除方面起着关键作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f324/7224512/03aab04ccb7c/pone.0232652.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f324/7224512/cedea0bc5d8e/pone.0232652.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f324/7224512/9f0798058b63/pone.0232652.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f324/7224512/15e95c190da7/pone.0232652.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f324/7224512/466831e82758/pone.0232652.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f324/7224512/49ef138f0eb9/pone.0232652.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f324/7224512/03aab04ccb7c/pone.0232652.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f324/7224512/cedea0bc5d8e/pone.0232652.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f324/7224512/9f0798058b63/pone.0232652.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f324/7224512/15e95c190da7/pone.0232652.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f324/7224512/466831e82758/pone.0232652.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f324/7224512/49ef138f0eb9/pone.0232652.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f324/7224512/03aab04ccb7c/pone.0232652.g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Herd immunity and a vaccination game: An experimental study.群体免疫与接种博弈:一项实验研究。
PLoS One. 2020 May 14;15(5):e0232652. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232652. eCollection 2020.
2
To achieve "zero covid" we need to include the controlled, careful acquisition of population (herd) immunity.要实现“动态清零”,我们需要纳入可控、审慎地获取群体免疫这一要素。
BMJ. 2020 Sep 9;370:m3487. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3487.
3
Herd immunity - estimating the level required to halt the COVID-19 epidemics in affected countries.群体免疫——评估受影响国家遏制新冠疫情所需的群体免疫水平。
J Infect. 2020 Jun;80(6):e32-e33. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.03.027. Epub 2020 Mar 21.
4
Is Gradual and Controlled Approach to Herd Protection a Valid Strategy to Curb the COVID-19 Pandemic?逐步且可控的群体保护方法是遏制新冠疫情的有效策略吗?
Indian Pediatr. 2020 Jun 15;57(6):505-507. doi: 10.1007/s13312-020-1844-4. Epub 2020 May 6.
5
Herd immunity and COVID-19.群体免疫与新冠病毒病
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020 Apr;24(8):4064-4065. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202004_20978.
6
COVID-19: Mitigation or suppression?新冠病毒病:缓解还是抑制?
Arab J Gastroenterol. 2020 Mar;21(1):1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajg.2020.04.010.
7
Impact of Microbiota: A Paradigm for Evolving Herd Immunity against Viral Diseases.微生物组的影响:针对病毒病不断发展群体免疫的范例。
Viruses. 2020 Oct 10;12(10):1150. doi: 10.3390/v12101150.
8
Coronavirus creates a flu season guessing game.冠状病毒引发了流感季预测难题。
Science. 2020 Aug 21;369(6506):890-891. doi: 10.1126/science.369.6506.890.
9
Covid-19: public messaging on vaccination must heed warnings from confused face mask messaging.新冠疫情:关于疫苗接种的公共宣传必须吸取混乱的口罩宣传所带来的教训。
BMJ. 2020 Sep 30;370:m3775. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3775.
10
COVID-19 vaccination clinical trials should consider multiple doses of BCG.2019冠状病毒病疫苗临床试验应考虑多次接种卡介苗。
Pharmazie. 2020 Apr 6;75(4):159. doi: 10.1691/ph.2020.0444.

引用本文的文献

1
An experimental game to assess hunter's participation in zoonotic diseases surveillance.评估猎人参与动物源性传染病监测的实验性游戏。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Feb 1;24(1):342. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17696-7.
2
Analyzing the Costs and Benefits of Utilizing a Mixed-Strategy Approach in Infectious Disease Control under a Voluntary Vaccination Policy.分析在自愿接种疫苗政策下采用混合策略方法控制传染病的成本与效益。
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Sep 11;11(9):1476. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11091476.
3
Trust and vaccination intentions: Evidence from Lithuania during the COVID-19 pandemic.

本文引用的文献

1
Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response.利用社会和行为科学来支持 COVID-19 大流行应对。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 May;4(5):460-471. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0884-z. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
2
Group Size Effect on Cooperation in One-Shot Social Dilemmas II: Curvilinear Effect.单次社会困境中群体规模对合作的影响II:曲线效应
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 16;10(7):e0131419. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131419. eCollection 2015.
3
West African Ebola epidemic after one year--slowing but not yet under control.西非埃博拉疫情一年后——疫情减缓但尚未得到控制。
信任与疫苗接种意愿:COVID-19 大流行期间立陶宛的证据。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 23;17(11):e0278060. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278060. eCollection 2022.
4
Interventions to increase COVID-19 vaccine uptake: a scoping review.干预措施以提高 COVID-19 疫苗接种率:范围综述。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 3;8(8):CD015270. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015270.
5
On the Origin of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in COVID-19.新冠病毒感染中中性粒细胞胞外诱捕网的起源
Front Immunol. 2022 Mar 11;13:821007. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.821007. eCollection 2022.
6
The path towards herd immunity: Predicting COVID-19 vaccination uptake through results from a stated choice study across six continents.迈向群体免疫的道路:通过在六大洲开展的一项选择研究的结果预测 COVID-19 疫苗接种率。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Apr;298:114800. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114800. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
7
The transmission game: Testing behavioral interventions in a pandemic-like simulation.传播游戏:在类似大流行的模拟中测试行为干预措施。
Sci Adv. 2022 Feb 25;8(8):eabk0428. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abk0428.
8
Social distancing is a social dilemma game played by every individual against his/her population.社交距离是每个个体与其所在人群进行博弈的社会困境游戏。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 2;16(8):e0255543. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255543. eCollection 2021.
9
COVID-19 Pandemic: A Compressive Review on Gender, Herd Immunity, and Physiological Mechanisms.新冠疫情:关于性别、群体免疫和生理机制的综述
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2020 Dec 14;13:2963-2974. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S276342. eCollection 2020.
10
Predicting and analyzing the COVID-19 epidemic in China: Based on SEIRD, LSTM and GWR models.预测和分析中国的 COVID-19 疫情:基于 SEIRD、LSTM 和 GWR 模型。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 27;15(8):e0238280. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238280. eCollection 2020.
N Engl J Med. 2015 Feb 5;372(6):584-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1414992. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
4
The economics of vaccination.疫苗接种的经济学
J Theor Biol. 2014 Dec 21;363:105-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.08.003. Epub 2014 Aug 9.
5
Free-riding behavior in vaccination decisions: an experimental study.疫苗接种决策中的搭便车行为:一项实验研究。
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 24;9(1):e87164. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087164. eCollection 2014.
6
Advancement of global health: key messages from the Disease Control Priorities Project.全球卫生的进展:疾病控制优先项目的关键信息
Lancet. 2006 Apr 8;367(9517):1193-208. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68440-7.
7
Vaccination and the theory of games.疫苗接种与博弈论。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Sep 7;101(36):13391-4. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0403823101. Epub 2004 Aug 25.