• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

迈向群体免疫的道路:通过在六大洲开展的一项选择研究的结果预测 COVID-19 疫苗接种率。

The path towards herd immunity: Predicting COVID-19 vaccination uptake through results from a stated choice study across six continents.

机构信息

University of Leeds, United Kingdom.

Australian National University, Australia.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2022 Apr;298:114800. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114800. Epub 2022 Feb 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114800
PMID:35287066
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8848547/
Abstract

Despite unprecedented progress in developing COVID-19 vaccines, global vaccination levels needed to reach herd immunity remain a distant target, while new variants keep emerging. Obtaining near universal vaccine uptake relies on understanding and addressing vaccine resistance. Simple questions about vaccine acceptance however ignore that the vaccines being offered vary across countries and even population subgroups, and differ in terms of efficacy and side effects. By using advanced discrete choice models estimated on stated choice data collected in 18 countries/territories across six continents, we show a substantial influence of vaccine characteristics. Uptake increases if more efficacious vaccines (95% vs 60%) are offered (mean across study areas = 3.9%, range of 0.6%-8.1%) or if vaccines offer at least 12 months of protection (mean across study areas = 2.4%, range of 0.2%-5.8%), while an increase in severe side effects (from 0.001% to 0.01%) leads to reduced uptake (mean = -1.3%, range of -0.2% to -3.9%). Additionally, a large share of individuals (mean = 55.2%, range of 28%-75.8%) would delay vaccination by 3 months to obtain a more efficacious (95% vs 60%) vaccine, where this increases further if the low efficacy vaccine has a higher risk (0.01% instead of 0.001%) of severe side effects (mean = 65.9%, range of 41.4%-86.5%). Our work highlights that careful consideration of which vaccines to offer can be beneficial. In support of this, we provide an interactive tool to predict uptake in a country as a function of the vaccines being deployed, and also depending on the levels of infectiousness and severity of circulating variants of COVID-19.

摘要

尽管在开发 COVID-19 疫苗方面取得了前所未有的进展,但要实现群体免疫所需的全球疫苗接种率仍遥遥无期,而新的变异株仍在不断出现。实现近乎普遍的疫苗接种率依赖于对疫苗抗性的理解和应对。然而,人们对疫苗接受程度的简单问题忽略了这样一个事实,即所提供的疫苗因国家甚至人口亚组而异,并且在疗效和副作用方面也存在差异。通过使用在六大洲 18 个国家/地区收集的基于陈述选择数据估计的高级离散选择模型,我们表明疫苗特性具有很大的影响力。如果提供更有效的疫苗(95%对 60%)(跨研究区域平均值为 3.9%,范围为 0.6%-8.1%)或提供至少 12 个月保护的疫苗(跨研究区域平均值为 2.4%,范围为 0.2%-5.8%),接种率会增加,而严重副作用的增加(从 0.001%增加到 0.01%)会导致接种率降低(平均值为-1.3%,范围为-0.2%-3.9%)。此外,很大一部分人(平均值为 55.2%,范围为 28%-75.8%)会将接种时间推迟 3 个月,以获得更有效的(95%对 60%)疫苗,如果低疗效疫苗的严重副作用风险更高(0.01%而不是 0.001%),这种情况会进一步增加(平均值为 65.9%,范围为 41.4%-86.5%)。我们的工作强调,仔细考虑提供哪些疫苗是有益的。为此,我们提供了一个交互式工具,可以根据正在部署的疫苗以及 COVID-19 传播变体的传染性和严重程度,预测一个国家的接种率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6b2/9003579/c3c348e2578a/gr11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6b2/9003579/d787e4547779/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6b2/9003579/54dfeae79a58/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6b2/9003579/e297426cb31e/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6b2/9003579/b1d2b4b7740e/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6b2/9003579/d84050b4bc96/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6b2/9003579/8b67367f46ea/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6b2/9003579/4a170f09c703/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6b2/9003579/a01d1ffd26cb/gr8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6b2/9003579/9737f0574eba/gr9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6b2/9003579/4f51000a6668/gr10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6b2/9003579/c3c348e2578a/gr11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6b2/9003579/d787e4547779/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6b2/9003579/54dfeae79a58/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6b2/9003579/e297426cb31e/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6b2/9003579/b1d2b4b7740e/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6b2/9003579/d84050b4bc96/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6b2/9003579/8b67367f46ea/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6b2/9003579/4a170f09c703/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6b2/9003579/a01d1ffd26cb/gr8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6b2/9003579/9737f0574eba/gr9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6b2/9003579/4f51000a6668/gr10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6b2/9003579/c3c348e2578a/gr11.jpg

相似文献

1
The path towards herd immunity: Predicting COVID-19 vaccination uptake through results from a stated choice study across six continents.迈向群体免疫的道路:通过在六大洲开展的一项选择研究的结果预测 COVID-19 疫苗接种率。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Apr;298:114800. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114800. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
2
The herd-immunity threshold must be updated for multi-vaccine strategies and multiple variants.群体免疫阈值必须针对多疫苗策略和多种变体进行更新。
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 26;11(1):22970. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-00083-2.
3
COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in a representative working-age population in France: a survey experiment based on vaccine characteristics.法国具有代表性的工作年龄人群中对新冠疫苗的犹豫态度:一项基于疫苗特性的调查实验
Lancet Public Health. 2021 Apr;6(4):e210-e221. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00012-8. Epub 2021 Feb 6.
4
Would COVID-19 vaccination willingness increase if mobile technologies prohibit unvaccinated individuals from public spaces? A nationwide discrete choice experiment from China.如果移动技术禁止未接种疫苗的人进入公共场所,是否会增加 COVID-19 疫苗接种意愿?来自中国的全国性离散选择实验。
Vaccine. 2022 Dec 5;40(51):7466-7475. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.10.020. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
5
Network models to evaluate vaccine strategies towards herd immunity in COVID-19.用于评估 COVID-19 群体免疫疫苗策略的网络模型。
J Theor Biol. 2021 Dec 21;531:110894. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2021.110894. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
6
Does Seeing What Others Do Through Social Media Influence Vaccine Uptake and Help in the Herd Immunity Through Vaccination? A Cross-Sectional Analysis.通过社交媒体观察他人的行为是否会影响疫苗接种率并有助于通过接种疫苗实现群体免疫?一项横断面分析。
Front Public Health. 2021 Nov 2;9:715931. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.715931. eCollection 2021.
7
Interventions to increase COVID-19 vaccine uptake: a scoping review.干预措施以提高 COVID-19 疫苗接种率:范围综述。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 3;8(8):CD015270. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015270.
8
mRNA vaccine-induced T cells respond identically to SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern but differ in longevity and homing properties depending on prior infection status.mRNA 疫苗诱导的 T 细胞对 SARS-CoV-2 关切变异株的反应完全相同,但根据先前的感染状态,其持久性和归巢特性存在差异。
Elife. 2021 Oct 12;10:e72619. doi: 10.7554/eLife.72619.
9
The impact of national income and vaccine hesitancy on country-level COVID-19 vaccine uptake.国家收入和疫苗犹豫对国家层面 COVID-19 疫苗接种率的影响。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 2;18(11):e0293184. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293184. eCollection 2023.
10
Cross-country evidence on the role of national governance in boosting COVID-19 vaccination.跨国证据表明,国家治理在推动 COVID-19 疫苗接种方面发挥了作用。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Mar 23;22(1):576. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12985-5.

引用本文的文献

1
A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments on Preferences for COVID-19 Vaccinations.关于新冠疫苗接种偏好的离散选择实验的系统评价
Patient. 2025 Jul 10. doi: 10.1007/s40271-025-00753-7.
2
Social Media and the Evolution of Vaccine Preferences During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Discrete Choice Experiment.社交媒体与新冠疫情期间疫苗偏好的演变:离散选择实验
JMIR Infodemiology. 2025 May 28;5:e66081. doi: 10.2196/66081.
3
The Evolving Landscape of Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Systematic Review.健康经济学中离散选择实验的发展态势:一项系统综述

本文引用的文献

1
Fear of Adverse Effects and COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: Recommendations of the Treatment Expectation Expert Group.对不良反应的恐惧与新冠疫苗犹豫:治疗期望专家组的建议
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Apr 1;2(4):e210804. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.0804.
2
"Please, you go first!" preferences for a COVID-19 vaccine among adults in the Netherlands.“请你先打!”荷兰成年人对 COVID-19 疫苗的偏好。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jan;292:114626. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114626. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
3
Quality of care experience in aged care: An Australia-Wide discrete choice experiment to elicit preference weights.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01495-y.
4
Real-world COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness in Zimbabwe: A test-negative case-control study.津巴布韦新冠疫苗在现实世界中的有效性:一项检测呈阴性的病例对照研究。
J Public Health Afr. 2025 Feb 19;16(1):695. doi: 10.4102/jphia.v16i1.695. eCollection 2025.
5
Serological insights from SARS-CoV-2 heterologous prime and boost responses in Thailand.泰国SARS-CoV-2异源初免和加强免疫反应的血清学见解
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 9;15(1):1519. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-84392-2.
6
COVID-19 Vaccine Preferences in General Populations in Canada, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States: Discrete Choice Experiment.加拿大、德国、英国和美国普通人群对 COVID-19 疫苗的偏好:离散选择实验。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Oct 16;10:e57242. doi: 10.2196/57242.
7
Unlocking insights: Navigating COVID-19 challenges and Emulating future pandemic Resilience strategies with strengthening natural immunity.解锁见解:应对新冠疫情挑战并通过增强自然免疫力效仿未来大流行的韧性策略。
Heliyon. 2024 Jul 17;10(15):e34691. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34691. eCollection 2024 Aug 15.
8
Preferences for COVID-19 Vaccines: Systematic Literature Review of Discrete Choice Experiments.对 COVID-19 疫苗的偏好:离散选择实验的系统文献综述。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Jul 29;10:e56546. doi: 10.2196/56546.
9
Healthcare professionals' perception and COVID-19 vaccination attitudes in North-Western Ghana: A multi-center analysis.加纳西北部医疗专业人员对 COVID-19 疫苗的认知和态度:一项多中心分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 22;19(2):e0298810. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298810. eCollection 2024.
10
Vaccine decision making in New Zealand: a discrete choice experiment.新西兰的疫苗决策:一项离散选择实验。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Feb 12;24(1):447. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17865-8.
老年护理服务体验质量:一项澳大利亚全国范围的离散选择实验以获取偏好权重。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Nov;289:114440. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114440. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
4
Monetary incentives increase COVID-19 vaccinations.金钱激励措施可提高 COVID-19 疫苗接种率。
Science. 2021 Nov 12;374(6569):879-882. doi: 10.1126/science.abm0475. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
5
Assessment of Communication Strategies for Mitigating COVID-19 Vaccine-Specific Hesitancy in Canada.评估加拿大减轻 COVID-19 疫苗犹豫相关沟通策略。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Sep 1;4(9):e2126635. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.26635.
6
The effect of unobserved preferences and race on vaccination hesitancy for COVID-19 vaccines: implications for health disparities.未观察到的偏好和种族对 COVID-19 疫苗接种犹豫的影响:对健康差异的影响。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Sep;27(9-a Suppl):S4-S13. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.9-a.s4.
7
Public preferences for the allocation of donor organs for transplantation: A discrete choice experiment.公众对器官捐赠移植分配的偏好:离散选择实验。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Oct;287:114360. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114360. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
8
The long road ahead for COVID-19 vaccination in Africa.非洲新冠疫苗接种之路漫长。
Lancet. 2021 Sep 4;398(10303):827-828. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01967-X.
9
Understanding COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy.理解对新冠疫苗的犹豫态度。
Nat Med. 2021 Aug;27(8):1338-1339. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01459-7.
10
COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and hesitancy in low- and middle-income countries.新冠病毒疫苗在中低收入国家的接受程度和犹豫。
Nat Med. 2021 Aug;27(8):1385-1394. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01454-y. Epub 2021 Jul 16.