Suppr超能文献

没有证据表明语言区域之间在时间接受窗口方面存在差异。

No evidence for differences among language regions in their temporal receptive windows.

机构信息

Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences and McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.

Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences and McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.

出版信息

Neuroimage. 2020 Oct 1;219:116925. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116925. Epub 2020 May 11.

Abstract

The "core language network" consists of left frontal and temporal regions that are selectively engaged in linguistic processing. Whereas functional differences among these regions have long been debated, many accounts propose distinctions in terms of representational grain-size-e.g., words vs. phrases/sentences-or processing time-scale, i.e., operating on local linguistic features vs. larger spans of input. Indeed, the topography of language regions appears to overlap with a cortical hierarchy reported by Lerner et al. (2011) wherein mid-posterior temporal regions are sensitive to low-level features of speech, surrounding areas-to word-level information, and inferior frontal areas-to sentence-level information and beyond. However, the correspondence between the language network and this hierarchy of "temporal receptive windows" (TRWs) is difficult to establish because the precise anatomical locations of language regions vary across individuals. To directly test this correspondence, we first identified language regions in each participant with a well-validated task-based localizer, which confers high functional resolution to the study of TRWs (traditionally based on stereotactic coordinates); then, we characterized regional TRWs with the naturalistic story listening paradigm of Lerner et al. (2011), which augments task-based characterizations of the language network by more closely resembling comprehension "in the wild". We find no region-by-TRW interactions across temporal and inferior frontal regions, which are all sensitive to both word-level and sentence-level information. Therefore, the language network as a whole constitutes a unique stage of information integration within a broader cortical hierarchy.

摘要

“核心语言网络”由左侧额颞区域组成,这些区域专门参与语言处理。虽然这些区域之间的功能差异长期以来一直存在争议,但许多解释都提出了在表示粒度方面的区别,例如单词与短语/句子,或者在处理时间尺度方面的区别,即操作局部语言特征与更大的输入跨度。事实上,语言区域的拓扑结构似乎与勒纳等人(2011 年)报告的皮质层次结构重叠,其中中后颞叶区域对语音的低水平特征敏感,周围区域对单词水平的信息敏感,下额叶区域对句子水平的信息敏感,甚至更高。然而,语言网络与“时间接受窗口”(TRW)的层次结构之间的对应关系很难建立,因为语言区域的精确解剖位置在个体之间存在差异。为了直接测试这种对应关系,我们首先使用经过充分验证的基于任务的定位器在每个参与者中识别语言区域,这为 TRW 的研究提供了高功能分辨率(传统上基于立体坐标);然后,我们使用勒纳等人(2011 年)的自然故事聆听范式来描述区域 TRW,该范式通过更接近“野外”理解来增强基于任务的语言网络描述。我们没有在颞叶和下额叶区域发现区域与 TRW 的相互作用,这些区域都对单词和句子水平的信息敏感。因此,整个语言网络构成了更广泛皮质层次结构中信息整合的独特阶段。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

2
Semantic composition in experimental and naturalistic paradigms.实验范式和自然主义范式中的语义合成
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2024 Jan 22;2. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00072. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

7
Broca's Area Is Not a Natural Kind.布罗卡区不是自然种类。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Apr;24(4):270-284. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.01.001. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
10
The Cortical Organization of Syntax.句法的皮层组织
Cereb Cortex. 2020 Mar 14;30(3):1481-1498. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhz180.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验