Brain and Cognitive Sciences Department, and McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Department of Psychology, University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Apr;24(4):270-284. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.01.001. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
Theories of human cognition prominently feature 'Broca's area', which causally contributes to a myriad of mental functions. However, Broca's area is not a monolithic, multipurpose unit - it is structurally and functionally heterogeneous. Some functions engaging (subsets of) this area share neurocognitive resources, whereas others rely on separable circuits. A decade of converging evidence has now illuminated a fundamental distinction between two subregions of Broca's area that likely play computationally distinct roles in cognition: one belongs to the domain-specific 'language network', the other to the domain-general 'multiple-demand (MD) network'. Claims about Broca's area should be (re)cast in terms of these (and other, as yet undetermined) functional components, to establish a cumulative research enterprise where empirical findings can be replicated and theoretical proposals can be meaningfully compared and falsified.
人类认知理论的突出特点是“布洛卡区”,它对无数的心理功能起着因果关系的作用。然而,布洛卡区不是一个单一的、多用途的单元——它在结构和功能上是异构的。一些涉及(部分)该区域的功能共享神经认知资源,而其他功能则依赖于可分离的回路。现在,十年来的汇聚证据已经揭示了布洛卡区的两个亚区之间的一个基本区别,这两个亚区可能在认知中扮演着计算上不同的角色:一个属于特定领域的“语言网络”,另一个属于非特定领域的“多重需求(MD)网络”。关于布洛卡区的说法应该(重新)用这些(以及其他尚未确定的)功能成分来表达,以建立一个累积的研究事业,在这个事业中,实证发现可以被复制,理论建议可以被有意义地比较和证伪。