Boenicke Lars, Doerner Johannes, Wirth Stefan, Zirngibl Hubert, Langenbach Mike Ralf
Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Helios University Hospital Wuppertal, University Witten-Herdecke, Wuppertal, Germany.
Department of Pediatrics, Helios University Hospital Wuppertal, University Witten-Herdecke, Wuppertal, Germany.
Clin Exp Pediatr. 2020 Jul;63(7):272-277. doi: 10.3345/cep.2019.00969. Epub 2020 May 15.
The optimal management of perianal abscess in children is controversial.
To evaluate the efficiency of conservative treatment of perianal abscess in children and identify parameters that predict therapy failure.
All cases of children younger than 14 years of age with perianal abscesses between 2001-2016 were evaluated.
Of the 113 enrolled patients, 64 underwent subsequent surgery for advanced disease (primary surgery group). Conservative treatment was initiated in 49 patients (primary conservative group) but was stopped because of inefficiency in 25 patients, who were referred for surgery after a median 7.03 days (range, 2 to 16 days). The other 24 patients (48%) initially achieved complete remission after conservative treatment, but 10 were readmitted after a median 34 months (range, 3 to 145 months) with recurrent disease. There were no significant differences in permanent success after conservative treatment between infants (10 of 29, 34%) and older children (4 of 20 [20%], P=0.122). Overall, conservative treatment alone was effective in only 14 of 113 patients. Recurrence after surgery occurred in 16 patients (25%) in the primary surgery group and 11 patients (22%) in the primary conservative group (P=0.75). Univariate analysis of predictors for conservative treatment failure revealed inflammatory values (C-reactive protein and white blood count, P=0.017) and abscess size (P=0.001) as significant parameters, whereas multivariate analysis demonstrated that only abscess size (odds ratio, 3.37; P=0.023) was significant.
Conservative treatment of perianal abscess is permanently efficient in only a minority of children but is not associated with a higher recurrence rate after subsequent surgery. Abscess size is a predictor for therapy failure.
儿童肛周脓肿的最佳治疗方法存在争议。
评估儿童肛周脓肿保守治疗的疗效,并确定预测治疗失败的参数。
对2001年至2016年间所有14岁以下肛周脓肿患儿的病例进行评估。
在113名登记患者中,64例因病情进展接受了后续手术(初次手术组)。49例患者开始接受保守治疗(初次保守组),但25例因治疗无效而停止,这些患者在中位7.03天(范围2至16天)后被转诊接受手术。另外24例患者(48%)最初在保守治疗后实现完全缓解,但10例在中位34个月(范围3至145个月)后因疾病复发再次入院。婴儿(29例中的10例,34%)和大龄儿童(20例中的4例[20%])在保守治疗后的永久成功率无显著差异(P = 0.122)。总体而言,113例患者中仅14例单纯保守治疗有效。初次手术组16例患者(25%)术后复发,初次保守组11例患者(22%)术后复发(P = 0.75)。保守治疗失败预测因素的单因素分析显示,炎症指标(C反应蛋白和白细胞计数,P = 0.017)和脓肿大小(P = 0.001)为显著参数,而多因素分析表明只有脓肿大小(比值比,3.37;P = 0.023)具有显著性。
肛周脓肿的保守治疗仅对少数儿童有持久疗效,但与后续手术后较高的复发率无关。脓肿大小是治疗失败的预测指标。