Marques Ines P, Madeira Maria H, Messias Ana L, Santos Torcato, Martinho António C-V, Figueira João, Cunha-Vaz José
AIBILI-Association for Innovation and Biomedical Research on Light and Image, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal.
Dentistry Department, Faculty of Medicine University of Coimbra, 3000-075 Coimbra, Portugal.
J Clin Med. 2020 May 12;9(5):1433. doi: 10.3390/jcm9051433.
Our group reported that three diabetic retinopathy (DR) phenotypes: A, characterized by low microaneurysm turnover (MAT < 6) and normal central retinal thickness (CRT); B, low MAT (<6) and increased CRT, and C, high MAT (≥6), present different risks for development of macular edema (DME) and proliferative retinopathy (PDR). To test these findings, 212 persons with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and mild nonproliferative retinopathy (NPDR), one eye per person, were followed for five years with annual visits. Of these, 172 completed the follow-up or developed an outcome: PDR or DME (considering both clinically significant macular edema (CSME) and center-involved macular edema (CIME)). Twenty-seven eyes (16%) developed either CSME (14), CIME (10), or PDR (4), with one eye developing both CSME and PDR. Phenotype A showed no association with development of vision-threatening complications. Seven eyes with phenotype B and three with phenotype C developed CIME. Phenotype C showed higher risk for CSME development, with 17.41 odds ratio ( = 0.010), compared with phenotypes A + B. All eyes that developed PDR were classified as phenotype C. Levels of HbA and triglycerides were increased in phenotype C ( < 0.001 and = 0.018, respectively). In conclusion, phenotype C identifies eyes at higher risk for development of CSME and PDR, whereas phenotype A identifies eyes at very low risk for vision-threatening complications.
我们的研究小组报告称,三种糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)表型:A,其特征为微动脉瘤周转率低(MAT<6)且中心视网膜厚度(CRT)正常;B,MAT低(<6)且CRT增加;C,MAT高(≥6),呈现出不同的黄斑水肿(DME)和增殖性视网膜病变(PDR)发生风险。为了验证这些发现,对212例2型糖尿病(T2D)和轻度非增殖性视网膜病变(NPDR)患者进行了研究,每人一只眼,每年随访一次,持续五年。其中,172例完成了随访或出现了某种结局:PDR或DME(包括临床显著性黄斑水肿(CSME)和累及中心的黄斑水肿(CIME))。27只眼(16%)出现了CSME(14只)、CIME(10只)或PDR(4只),其中一只眼同时出现了CSME和PDR。表型A与视力威胁性并发症的发生无关联。7只表型B的眼和3只表型C的眼出现了CIME。与表型A+B相比,表型C发生CSME的风险更高,优势比为17.41(P=0.010)。所有出现PDR的眼均被归类为表型C。表型C的糖化血红蛋白和甘油三酯水平升高(分别为P<0.001和P=0.018)。总之,表型C识别出发生CSME和PDR风险较高的眼,而表型A识别出发生视力威胁性并发症风险极低的眼。