Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall i.T., Austria.
Department of Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Sciences Postgraduate Research Program, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.
Br J Haematol. 2020 Nov;191(3):405-417. doi: 10.1111/bjh.16654. Epub 2020 May 14.
Treatment options for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) vary widely, depending on the natural disease course and patient-related factors. Comparison of treatment effectiveness is challenging as different endpoints have been included in clinical trials and outcome reporting. Our goal was to develop the first MDS core outcome set (MDS-COS) defining a minimum set of outcomes that should be reported in future clinical studies. We performed a comprehensive systematic literature review among MDS studies to extract patient- and/or clinically relevant outcomes. Clinical experts from the European LeukemiaNet MDS (EUMDS) identified 26 potential MDS core outcomes and participated in a three-round Delphi survey. After the first survey (56 experts), 15 outcomes met the inclusion criteria and one additional outcome was included. The second round (38 experts) resulted in six included outcomes. In the third round, a final check on plausibility and practicality of the six included outcomes and their definitions was performed. The final MDS-COS includes: health-related quality of life, treatment-related mortality, overall survival, performance status, safety, and haematological improvement. This newly developed MDS-COS represents the first minimum set of outcomes aiming to enhance comparability across future MDS studies and facilitate a better understanding of treatment effectiveness.
骨髓增生异常综合征 (MDS) 的治疗选择因疾病自然进程和患者相关因素而异。由于临床试验和结果报告中纳入了不同的终点,因此治疗效果的比较具有挑战性。我们的目标是制定第一个 MDS 核心结局集 (MDS-COS),定义应在未来临床研究中报告的最小一组结局。我们对 MDS 研究进行了全面的系统文献回顾,以提取患者和/或临床相关的结局。来自欧洲白血病网 MDS (EUMDS) 的临床专家确定了 26 个潜在的 MDS 核心结局,并参与了三轮 Delphi 调查。在第一轮调查(56 位专家)之后,有 15 个结局符合纳入标准,另外又纳入了一个结局。第二轮(38 位专家)纳入了 6 个结局。在第三轮中,对纳入的 6 个结局及其定义的合理性和实用性进行了最终检查。最终的 MDS-COS 包括:健康相关生活质量、治疗相关死亡率、总生存期、功能状态、安全性和血液学改善。这个新开发的 MDS-COS 代表了第一个旨在提高未来 MDS 研究可比性和更好地理解治疗效果的最小结局集。