Chen YungChia, O'Shaughnessy Thomas J, Kamimori Gary H, Horner David M, Egnoto Michael J, Bagchi Amit
Multifunctional Materials Branch, US Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC, United States.
Blast Induced Neurotrauma, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Springs, MD, United States.
Front Neurol. 2020 Apr 28;11:323. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00323. eCollection 2020.
The complex interfacial condition between the human brain and the skull has been difficult to emulate in a surrogate system. Surrogate head models have typically been built using a homogeneous viscoelastic material to represent the brain, but the effect of different interfacial conditions between the brain and the skull on pressure transduction into the brain during blast has not been studied. In the present work, three interfacial conditions were generated in physical surrogate human head models. The first surrogate consisted of a gel brain separated from the skull by a layer of saline solution similar in thickness to the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) layer in the human head: the fluid interface head model. The second surrogate head had the entire cranial cavity filled with the gel: the fixed interface head model. The third surrogate head contained a space-filling gel brain wrapped in a thin plastic film: the stick-slip interface head model. The human head surrogates were evaluated in a series of frontal blast tests to characterize the effect of skull-brain interfacial conditions on overpressure propagation into the gel brains. The fixed and the stick-slip interface head models showed nearly equal peak brain overpressures. In contrast, the fluid interface head model had much higher in-brain peak overpressures than the other two models, thus representing the largest transmission of forces into the gel brain. Given that the elevated peak overpressures occurred only in the fluid interface head model, the presence of the saline layer is likely responsible for this increase. This phenomenon is hypothesized to be attributed to the incompressibility of the saline and/or the impedance differences between the materials. The fixed interface head model showed pronounced high frequency energy content relative to the other two models, implying that the fluid and the stick-slip conditions provided better dampening. The cumulative impulse energy entering the three brain models were similar, suggesting that the interface conditions do not affect the total energy transmission over the positive phase duration of a blast event. This study shows that the fidelity of the surrogate human head models would improve with a CSF-emulating liquid layer.
人类大脑与颅骨之间复杂的界面状况很难在替代系统中模拟。替代头部模型通常使用均质粘弹性材料构建以代表大脑,但在爆炸过程中大脑与颅骨之间不同界面状况对压力传导至大脑的影响尚未得到研究。在本研究中,在物理替代人类头部模型中产生了三种界面状况。第一个替代模型由一层与人类头部脑脊液(CSF)层厚度相似的盐溶液将凝胶状大脑与颅骨隔开:流体界面头部模型。第二个替代头部的整个颅腔充满凝胶:固定界面头部模型。第三个替代头部包含一个包裹在薄塑料薄膜中的填充空间的凝胶状大脑:粘滑界面头部模型。在一系列正面爆炸试验中对人类头部替代模型进行了评估,以表征颅骨 - 大脑界面状况对超压传播至凝胶状大脑的影响。固定界面和粘滑界面头部模型显示出几乎相等的大脑峰值超压。相比之下,流体界面头部模型的脑内峰值超压比其他两个模型高得多,因此代表了传递至凝胶状大脑的最大力。鉴于峰值超压升高仅发生在流体界面头部模型中,盐溶液层的存在可能是造成这种增加的原因。据推测,这种现象归因于盐溶液的不可压缩性和/或材料之间的阻抗差异。相对于其他两个模型,固定界面头部模型显示出明显的高频能量含量,这意味着流体和粘滑状况提供了更好的阻尼。进入三个大脑模型的累积脉冲能量相似,这表明界面状况不会影响爆炸事件正相持续时间内的总能量传输。这项研究表明,使用模拟脑脊液的液体层可以提高替代人类头部模型的逼真度。