An inconvenient truth: More rigorous and ecologically valid research is needed to properly understand cognitive bias in forensic decisions.
作者信息
Curley Lee J, Munro James, Lages Martin
机构信息
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, School of Psychology and Counselling, The Open University, Milton Keynes, England, UK.
School of Applied Sciences, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
出版信息
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2020 Feb 8;2:107-109. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.01.004. eCollection 2020.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
An inconvenient truth: More rigorous and ecologically valid research is needed to properly understand cognitive bias in forensic decisions.
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2020 Feb 8;2:107-109. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.01.004. eCollection 2020.
2
Corrigendum to "An inconvenient truth: More rigorous and ecologically valid research is needed to properly understand cognitive bias in forensic decisions" [Forensic Sci. Int. Synergy 2 (2020) 107-109].
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2020 Apr 4;2:709. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.03.009. eCollection 2020.
3
Assessing Cognitive Bias in Forensic Decisions: A Review and Outlook.
J Forensic Sci. 2020 Mar;65(2):354-360. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.14220. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
4
A global survey of the attitudes and perspectives of cognitive bias in forensic anthropology.
Sci Justice. 2024 Jul;64(4):347-359. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2024.04.003. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
5
The use of contextual information in forensic toxicology: An international survey of toxicologists' experiences.
Sci Justice. 2019 Jul;59(4):380-389. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
6
Contextual bias in forensic toxicology decisions: A follow-up empirical study from China.
J Forensic Sci. 2024 Jul;69(4):1400-1406. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.15520. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
7
Cognitive bias research in forensic science: A systematic review.
Forensic Sci Int. 2019 Apr;297:35-46. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.01.016. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
8
A risk-based approach to cognitive bias in forensic science.
Sci Justice. 2019 Sep;59(5):533-543. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2019.04.003. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
9
Contextual bias on decision-making in forensic toxicology: First survey from China.
Forensic Sci Int. 2022 Apr;333:111232. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2022.111232. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
10
Cognitive bias in forensic pathology decisions.
J Forensic Sci. 2021 Sep;66(5):1751-1757. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.14697. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
引用本文的文献
1
Interpol review of forensic management, 2019-2022.
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2023 Jan 6;6:100301. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2022.100301. eCollection 2023.
2
Challenges to reasoning in forensic science decisions.
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2021 Dec 20;4:100200. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100200. eCollection 2022.
3
People who live in ivory towers shouldn't throw stones: A refutation of Curley et al.
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2020 Mar 10;2:110-113. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.03.001. eCollection 2020.
本文引用的文献
1
Juror comprehension of forensic expert testimony: A literature review and gap analysis.
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2019 Mar 9;1:24-34. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2019.03.001. eCollection 2019.
2
Assessing Cognitive Bias in Forensic Decisions: A Review and Outlook.
J Forensic Sci. 2020 Mar;65(2):354-360. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.14220. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
3
What do forensic analysts consider relevant to their decision making?
Sci Justice. 2019 Sep;59(5):516-523. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2019.04.005. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
4
How Do Legal Experts Cope With Medical Reports and Forensic Evidence? The Experiences, Perceptions, and Narratives of Swiss Judges and Other Legal Experts.
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Feb 13;10:18. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00018. eCollection 2019.
5
Cognitive bias research in forensic science: A systematic review.
Forensic Sci Int. 2019 Apr;297:35-46. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.01.016. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
6
Decision Science: A New Hope.
Psychol Rep. 2019 Dec;122(6):2417-2439. doi: 10.1177/0033294118797579. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
7
Faith in thy threshold.
Med Sci Law. 2018 Oct;58(4):239-250. doi: 10.1177/0025802418791062. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
8
Biases in forensic experts.
Science. 2018 Apr 20;360(6386):243. doi: 10.1126/science.aat8443.
9
Are consistent juror decisions related to fast and frugal decision making? Investigating the relationship between juror consistency, decision speed and cue utilisation.
Med Sci Law. 2017 Oct;57(4):211-219. doi: 10.1177/0025802417733354. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
10
A biased opinion: Demonstration of cognitive bias on a fingerprint matching task through knowledge of DNA test results.
Forensic Sci Int. 2017 Jul;276:93-106. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.04.009. Epub 2017 May 1.
Zotero 插件