Department of Neurology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
German Center for Vertigo and Balance Disorders (DSGZ), University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
PLoS One. 2020 May 15;15(5):e0233262. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233262. eCollection 2020.
Previous unimodal PET and fMRI studies in humans revealed a reproducible vestibular brain activation pattern, but with variations in its weighting and expansiveness. Hybrid studies minimizing methodological variations at baseline conditions are rare and still lacking for task-based designs. Thus, we applied for the first time hybrid 3T PET-MRI scanning (Siemens mMR) in healthy volunteers using galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) in healthy volunteers in order to directly compare H215O-PET and BOLD MRI responses. List mode PET acquisition started with the injection of 750 MBq H215O simultaneously to MRI EPI sequences. Group-level statistical parametric maps were generated for GVS vs. rest contrasts of PET, MR-onset (event-related), and MR-block. All contrasts showed a similar bilateral vestibular activation pattern with remarkable proximity of activation foci. Both BOLD contrasts gave more bilateral wide-spread activation clusters than PET; no area showed contradictory signal responses. PET still confirmed the right-hemispheric lateralization of the vestibular system, whereas BOLD-onset revealed only a tendency. The reciprocal inhibitory visual-vestibular interaction concept was confirmed by PET signal decreases in primary and secondary visual cortices, and BOLD-block decreases in secondary visual areas. In conclusion, MRI activation maps contained a mixture of CBF measured using H215O-PET and additional non-CBF effects, and the activation-deactivation pattern of the BOLD-block appears to be more similar to the H215O-PET than the BOLD-onset.
先前的单模态 PET 和 fMRI 研究在人类中揭示了一种可重复的前庭脑激活模式,但在其权重和扩展性上存在差异。在基线条件下最大限度地减少方法学变化的混合研究很少,对于基于任务的设计仍然缺乏。因此,我们首次在健康志愿者中应用了混合 3T PET-MRI 扫描(西门子 mMR),使用电前庭刺激(GVS),以便直接比较 H215O-PET 和 BOLD MRI 反应。列表模式 PET 采集在同时注射 750 MBq H215O 后开始,与 MRI EPI 序列一起进行。针对 PET、MR 起始(事件相关)和 MR 阻断的 GVS 与休息对照,生成了组水平的统计参数映射。所有对比都显示出相似的双侧前庭激活模式,激活焦点非常接近。BOLD 对比比 PET 产生了更多双侧广泛的激活簇;没有区域显示出相反的信号反应。PET 仍然证实了前庭系统的右半球偏侧化,而 BOLD 起始仅显示出一种趋势。PET 信号在初级和次级视觉皮质中的减少以及 BOLD 阻断在次级视觉区域中的减少证实了视觉-前庭相互抑制的概念。总之,MRI 激活图包含了使用 H215O-PET 测量的 CBF 的混合物和其他非 CBF 效应,并且 BOLD 阻断的激活-失活模式似乎与 H215O-PET 比 BOLD 起始更相似。