Service de Neurologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nancy, Nancy, France; LNCA, UMR 7364, CNRS, Université de Strasbourg, 67000 Strasbourg, France.
Service de Neurologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nancy, Nancy, France; CRAN, UMR 7039, CNRS, université de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Rev Neurol (Paris). 2020 Jun;176(6):448-455. doi: 10.1016/j.neurol.2020.04.012. Epub 2020 May 12.
In contrast to short-term cognitive outcomes, long-term cognitive outcomes (over 5 years) has been scarcely assessed so far. Yet, predicting long-term outcomes at any time point of the epilepsy, from initial diagnosis, to medically intractability is very important for therapeutic decision-making, patient information, and orientation. Assessing long-term cognitive outcomes in patients with epilepsy would ideally require longitudinal studies and a comparison with a healthy controls group. This issue has been addressed extensively, but with controversial results. However, there is a general consensus about the fact that cognitive outcome is not the same in all groups of patients with epilepsy. Possible prognostic factors include age at onset, duration of epilepsy, syndrome and etiology, seizure outcome and therapeutics. The multiplicity of factors makes it very difficult to assess their relative weight in individuals. Although long-term cognitive outcome studies are scarce, this issue has been specifically studied in newly diagnosed epilepsies and in focal drug-resistant epilepsies. In the first clinical setting, i.e. newly diagnosed epilepsy, it appears that cognitive deficits are already present at epilepsy onset in a significant proportion of patients but seem to remain stable over time. In focal drug-resistant epilepsies, cognitive deficits (mainly verbal memory) were generally shown to remain stable provided that seizures were controlled either by medication or by surgery. Beyond the possible correlation between seizure and cognitive outcome, no causal link however has been demonstrated between these two important outcomes.
与短期认知结果相反,长期认知结果(超过 5 年)到目前为止几乎没有被评估过。然而,预测癫痫任何时间点的长期结果,从初始诊断到药物难治性,对于治疗决策、患者信息和方向都非常重要。在癫痫患者中评估长期认知结果理想情况下需要进行纵向研究,并与健康对照组进行比较。这个问题已经被广泛研究过,但结果存在争议。然而,有一个普遍的共识,即认知结果在所有癫痫患者群体中并不相同。可能的预后因素包括发病年龄、癫痫持续时间、综合征和病因、发作结果和治疗。多种因素使得很难评估它们在个体中的相对权重。尽管长期认知结果研究很少,但这个问题已经在新诊断的癫痫和局灶性耐药性癫痫中进行了专门研究。在第一个临床环境中,即新诊断的癫痫,似乎在很大一部分患者中,认知缺陷在癫痫发作时就已经存在,但随着时间的推移似乎保持稳定。在局灶性耐药性癫痫中,只要通过药物或手术控制发作,认知缺陷(主要是语言记忆)通常保持稳定。除了发作和认知结果之间可能存在相关性之外,两者之间没有因果关系。