Division of Psychology and Mental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, UK.
School of Health in Social Science, University of Edinburgh, UK.
Br J Clin Psychol. 2020 Sep;59(3):335-353. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12249. Epub 2020 May 15.
The Psychosis Attachment Measure (PAM) is currently the most widely used and validated measure of attachment in psychosis. However, the PAM does not assess disorganized attachment, the type of attachment that has been most closely linked with vulnerability to psychosis. This study aimed to expand the PAM to capture the concept of disorganized attachment and to examine its psychometric properties in a psychosis sample.
Clinical and academic experts in the field of psychosis and service user representatives were asked to assess the comprehensiveness and comprehensibility of the pool of disorganized items. This process resulted in 12 items hypothesized to capture disorganized attachment that were included with the original items of the PAM. A sample of 144 individuals with either a self-reported diagnosis of, or treatment for, a psychosis-related condition completed a battery of online measures comprising the revised PAM, existing measures of adult disorganized attachment and constructs hypothesized to be conceptually related to disorganized attachment.
An exploratory factor analysis was conducted with three factors retained; these were labelled anxious, avoidant and disorganized attachment. The factors displayed good internal consistency and test-retest reliability and the disorganized factor displayed good construct validity with related measures and constructs.
These results provide preliminary evidence that the revised PAM captures the concept of disorganized attachment. However, confirmatory psychometric evaluation of the revised PAM is required, within a separate psychosis sample, to confirm its factor structure. The relationship between these results and the current literature, in addition to the clinical and research implications, are discussed.
We present an expanded version of the Psychosis Attachment Measure (PAM), revised to capture the concept of disorganised attachment in adulthood. This expanded measure showed good reliability and the new disorganized subscale demonstrated construct validity. These results provide preliminary evidence that disorganized attachment can be measured using a simple self-report measure with individuals with psychosis. Further research is required to confirm the structural dimensionality of the revised PAM within a new sample using confirmatory factor analysis. Following further psychometric validation the use of this measure has the potential to be expanded to other mental health conditions in which disorganized attachment has been implicated in the development and maintenance of difficulties, for example, trauma-related conditions and borderline personality disorder.
精神病 Attachment Measure(PAM)是目前使用最广泛且经过验证的精神病 Attachment 测量工具。然而,PAM 并未评估非组织化的 Attachment,这种 Attachment 类型与精神病易感性的关系最为密切。本研究旨在扩展 PAM 以捕捉非组织化 Attachment 的概念,并在精神病样本中检验其心理测量特性。
精神病领域的临床和学术专家以及服务用户代表被要求评估非组织化项目的综合性和可理解性。这一过程产生了 12 个假设的非组织化 Attachment 项目,这些项目与 PAM 的原始项目一起纳入。一个由 144 名有或没有精神病相关疾病自我报告诊断或接受治疗的个体完成了一系列在线测量,包括修订后的 PAM、现有的成人非组织化 Attachment 测量和假设与非组织化 Attachment 概念上相关的测量。
保留了三个因素的探索性因素分析;这些因素被标记为焦虑、回避和非组织化 Attachment。这些因素显示出良好的内部一致性和重测信度,非组织化因素与相关测量和概念显示出良好的结构有效性。
这些结果初步表明,修订后的 PAM 捕捉到了非组织化 Attachment 的概念。然而,需要在一个单独的精神病样本中对修订后的 PAM 进行确认性心理测量评估,以确认其因子结构。此外,还讨论了这些结果与当前文献之间的关系,以及临床和研究意义。
我们提出了精神病 Attachment Measure(PAM)的扩展版本,该版本经过修订以捕捉成年期非组织化 Attachment 的概念。这个扩展的测量工具具有良好的可靠性,新的非组织化子量表显示出结构有效性。这些结果初步表明,非组织化 Attachment 可以通过使用简单的自我报告测量工具来测量精神病患者。需要进一步的研究来确认使用确认性因子分析在新样本中重新 PAM 的结构维度。在进一步的心理测量验证之后,该测量方法有可能扩展到其他与非组织化 Attachment 与发展和维持困难有关的心理健康状况,例如创伤相关状况和边缘型人格障碍。