School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Energy Balance Laboratory, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
J Neuromuscul Dis. 2020;7(3):331-342. doi: 10.3233/JND-200478.
Physical activity, assessed by accelerometers, has been proposed as a quantitative outcome measure for patients with DMD, but research is limitedObjective:To assess the total amount and patterns of physical activity in patients with DMD using accelerometers.
Physical activity was assessed in patients with DMD (n = 49, 13.6±4.0-year-old) and age- and sex-matched healthy controls (n = 15, 14.0±2.3-year-old) using wrist- and ankle-worn accelerometers. To assess the amount of activity, accelerometer recordings were converted into acceleration estimates (counts/min). Patterns of activity were assessed as the time that participants spent in sedentary, low-intensity, and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity categories. The sedentary category was divided into three (sedentary -1, -2, and -3) and the low-intensity into two (low-intensity-1, and -2) subcategories.
Physical activity across intensity categories differed between study groups (p < 0.001). Patients with DMD spent on average 98.8% of their daytime in the sedentary and low-intensity categories. Compared to non-ambulatory, ambulatory patients spent more time in sedentary-3 and low-intensity-2 subcategories (p < 0.001). Amount of activity was lower in all patients than controls (p < 0.05) and in non-ambulatory than ambulatory patients and controls (p < 0.001), but similar between ambulatory patients and controls. Activity measures in patients were significantly affected by age and ambulation status (p < 0.05) but not corticosteroid use.
Patients with DMD spent most of their daytime in sedentary and low-intensity activities. Dividing these intensities into three and two subcategories, respectively, allows better characterization of activity patterns in DMD. Ambulation status and age but not corticosteroid use affected activity measures in patients with DMD.
通过加速度计评估的身体活动已被提议作为 DMD 患者的定量结果测量指标,但相关研究有限。
使用加速度计评估 DMD 患者的身体活动总量和模式。
使用腕部和踝部佩戴的加速度计评估 DMD 患者(n = 49,13.6±4.0 岁)和年龄及性别匹配的健康对照组(n = 15,14.0±2.3 岁)的身体活动。为了评估活动量,将加速度计记录转换为加速度估计值(每分钟计数)。活动模式的评估方法是参与者在久坐、低强度和中等到剧烈身体活动类别的时间。久坐类别分为三个(久坐-1、-2 和-3),低强度类别分为两个(低强度-1 和-2)。
研究组之间各强度类别的身体活动不同(p < 0.001)。DMD 患者平均 98.8%的白天时间都处于久坐和低强度状态。与非运动患者相比,运动患者在久坐-3 和低强度-2 亚类中花费的时间更多(p < 0.001)。与对照组相比,所有患者的活动量都较低(p < 0.05),与非运动患者和对照组相比,非运动患者的活动量更低(p < 0.001),但运动患者与对照组相似。患者的活动测量结果受年龄和运动状态的显著影响(p < 0.05),但不受皮质类固醇使用的影响。
DMD 患者白天大部分时间都处于久坐和低强度活动状态。将这些强度分别细分为三个和两个亚类,可以更好地描述 DMD 中的活动模式。运动状态和年龄而非皮质类固醇使用影响 DMD 患者的活动测量结果。