Sánchez Daza Mariana
Laboratoire ICT, University of Paris (Diderot), Paris, France.
Ann Sci. 2020 Apr;77(2):139-154. doi: 10.1080/00033790.2020.1738746.
While the emergence of a new scientific culture in 16th-century Europe is well known, the role of the actors of the Hispanic New World in this time of renewal of knowledge has long been judged marginal for two reasons: first, because the strong presence of the Inquisition in the Hispanic World has been considered by historians to have been an obstacle for research or scientific innovation; and second, because the discontinuity of the territories of the Hispanic Monarchy and the problem of distances between Spain and the New World have long been interpreted in ways that suggest the marginality and peripheral status of the American colonies. However, some works counterbalance this dismissal and shed new light on the scientific activity of the Hispanic New World. This is the case with the treatise , by the secular priest Alvaro Alonso Barba, which would achieve remarkable fame and circulation, and would become a seminal work in the fields of metallurgy and mining until the mid-1700s. The article demonstrates that this treatise also presents ideas that can be traced back to a set of Paracelsian ideas combining alchemy, pharmacopoeia, and medicine, and studies specific examples of these ideas - the description of three fundamental substances (salt, mercury and sulphur) as components of all matter, references to Epatica sulfuris, an oil capable of turning silver into gold and curing certain diseases; and the use of antimony - that together testify to the spread of the ideas of Basil Valentine and of Paracelsian influences. From this point of view, can be viewed as part of a tradition unexpectedly renewed by the author through many observations based on his own work in Peru and the discoveries he made thanks to alternative techniques. This demonstrates the richness and diversity of knowledge rooted in the New World, and links Alonso Barba's scholarly activity to some of the great schools of thought that spanned the Early Modern European world.
虽然16世纪欧洲新科学文化的兴起广为人知,但西班牙新世界的参与者在这个知识复兴时期所起的作用长期以来一直被认为是微不足道的,原因有两个:第一,历史学家认为宗教裁判所在西班牙世界的强势存在是研究或科学创新的障碍;第二,西班牙君主国领土的不连续性以及西班牙与新世界之间的距离问题长期以来一直被解释为表明美洲殖民地处于边缘地位和外围状态。然而,一些作品对这种忽视进行了反驳,并为西班牙新世界的科学活动带来了新的启示。世俗牧师阿尔瓦罗·阿隆索·巴尔巴所著的论文就是这样一个例子,该论文获得了显著的声誉并广泛传播,直到18世纪中叶,它都将成为冶金和采矿领域的一部开创性著作。本文表明,这篇论文还提出了一些可以追溯到一套将炼金术、药典和医学结合起来的帕拉塞尔苏斯思想的观点,并研究了这些观点的具体例子——将三种基本物质(盐、汞和硫)描述为所有物质的组成部分,提及硫黄精,一种能将银变成金并治愈某些疾病的油;以及锑的使用——这些共同证明了巴西尔·瓦伦丁思想和帕拉塞尔苏斯影响的传播。从这个角度来看,[论文名称]可以被视为作者通过基于他在秘鲁的工作所做的许多观察以及他借助替代技术所取得的发现而意外复兴的一种传统的一部分。这证明了植根于新世界的知识的丰富性和多样性,并将阿隆索·巴尔巴的学术活动与早期现代欧洲世界的一些伟大思想流派联系起来。