Ganjali Raheleh, Golmakani Reza, Ebrahimi Mohsen, Eslami Saeid, Bolvardi Ehsan
Medical Informatics, Department of medical informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Doctor Shariati Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Bull Emerg Trauma. 2020 Apr;8(2):115-120. doi: 10.30476/BEAT.2020.46452.
To evaluate the accuracy of the five-level triage system using the emergency severity index (ESI) and to determine the compliance of the triage level with patient outcomes.
This was a cross-sectional study which was performed in the emergency department of Imam Reza Hospital of Mashhad during 2017. We included all the adult patients (≥15 years of age) referring to the emergency department. The data were recorded in a questionnaire containing three sections including demographic information, results of triage by ESI and final outcome of the patient. Patients referred to the triage unit were simultaneously triaged by triage nurse and some emergency medicine physicians. The triage was performed by a nurse with an emergency medicine physician (EMP) was considered as a gold standard and the outcome was compared in 24 hours later.
Overall, we included 400 patients with a mean age of 46.40 ± 18.52 years among whom there were 211 (52.8%) men and 189 (47.3%) women. Finally, 123 patients were hospitalized, 12 died, 256 were discharged by a physician, and 9 people left the hospital with their own consent. The calculated weight kappa was used to determine the agreement between the observers (nurse triage and physician) at 0.701 so that the agreement between the triage performed by a nurse and an EMP was in an excellent level (<0.001). There was a significant relationship between the triage levels (determined by physicians) and the outcome of the patient (<0.001), and the five-level system had a high overlap and significant relation with patient's outcome.
The results of the current study revealed that the five-level triage system using the ESI has a high accuracy in triage and estimates the patient outcomes effectively and thus, could be used as an effective system in hospital triage.
评估使用急诊严重程度指数(ESI)的五级分诊系统的准确性,并确定分诊级别与患者预后的符合程度。
这是一项横断面研究,于2017年在马什哈德伊玛目礼萨医院急诊科进行。我们纳入了所有转诊至急诊科的成年患者(≥15岁)。数据记录在一份包含三个部分的问卷中,包括人口统计学信息、ESI分诊结果和患者最终结局。转诊至分诊单元的患者由分诊护士和一些急诊医学医生同时进行分诊。由护士和急诊医学医生(EMP)共同进行分诊被视为金标准,并在24小时后比较结局。
总体而言,我们纳入了400例患者,平均年龄为46.40±18.52岁,其中男性211例(52.8%),女性189例(47.3%)。最后,123例患者住院,12例死亡,256例由医生出院,9例患者自行同意离院。计算得出的加权kappa值用于确定观察者(护士分诊和医生)之间的一致性为0.701,因此护士和EMP进行的分诊之间的一致性处于优秀水平(<0.001)。分诊级别(由医生确定)与患者结局之间存在显著关系(<0.001),五级系统与患者结局具有高度重叠和显著关系。
本研究结果表明,使用ESI的五级分诊系统在分诊方面具有很高的准确性,并能有效估计患者结局,因此可作为医院分诊的有效系统。