Suppr超能文献

院内转运期间的儿科心肺复苏质量

Pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality during intra-hospital transport.

作者信息

Loaec Morgann, Himebauch Adam S, Kilbaugh Todd J, Berg Robert A, Graham Kathryn, Hanna Richard, Wolfe Heather A, Sutton Robert M, Morgan Ryan W

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.

出版信息

Resuscitation. 2020 Jul;152:123-130. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.05.003. Epub 2020 May 15.

Abstract

AIM

To evaluate pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) quality during intra-hospital transport to facilitate extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)-CPR (ECPR). We compared chest compression (CC) rate, depth, and fraction (CCF) between the pre-transport and intra-transport periods.

METHODS

Observational study of children <18 years with either in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) or out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) who underwent transport between two care locations within the hospital for ECPR and who had CPR mechanics data available. Descriptive patient and arrest characteristics were summarized. The primary analysis compared pre- to intra-transport CC rate, depth, and fraction. A secondary analysis compared the proportion of pre- versus intra-transport 60-s epochs meeting guideline recommendations for rate (100-120/min), depth (≥4 cm for infants; ≥5 cm for children ≥1 year), and CCF (≥0.80).

RESULTS

Seven patients (four IHCA; three witnessed OHCA) met eligibility criteria. Six (86%) patients survived the event and two (28%) survived to hospital discharge. Median transport CPR duration was 7 [IQR 5.5, 8.5] minutes. There were no differences in pre- vs. intra-transport CC rate (115 [113, 118] vs. 118 [114, 127] CCs/minute; p = 0.18), depth (3.2 [2.7, 4.4] vs. 3.6 [2.5, 4.6] cm; p = 0.50), or CCF (0.89 [0.82, 0.90] vs. 0.92 [0.79, 0.97]; p = 0.31). Equivalent proportions of 60-s CPR epochs met guideline recommendations between pre- and intra-transport (rate: 66% vs. 57% [p = 0.22]; depth: 14% vs. 19% [p = 0.39]; CCF: 80% vs. 75% [p = 0.43]).

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric CPR quality was maintained during intra-hospital patient transport, suggesting that it is reasonable for ECPR systems to incorporate patient transport to facilitate ECMO cannulation.

摘要

目的

评估院内转运期间小儿心肺复苏(CPR)质量,以促进体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)-CPR(ECPR)。我们比较了转运前和转运期间的胸外按压(CC)频率、深度和比例(CCF)。

方法

对18岁以下因院内心脏骤停(IHCA)或院外心脏骤停(OHCA)而在医院内两个护理地点之间接受转运以进行ECPR且有CPR力学数据的儿童进行观察性研究。总结了患者和骤停的描述性特征。主要分析比较了转运前和转运期间的CC频率、深度和比例。次要分析比较了转运前和转运期间符合速率(100-120次/分钟)、深度(婴儿≥4厘米;1岁及以上儿童≥5厘米)和CCF(≥0.80)指南建议的60秒时段的比例。

结果

7例患者(4例IHCA;3例目击OHCA)符合纳入标准。6例(86%)患者存活,2例(28%)存活至出院。转运期间CPR的中位持续时间为7[四分位间距5.5,8.5]分钟。转运前和转运期间的CC频率(115[113,118]次/分钟对118[114,127]次/分钟;p = 0.18)、深度(3.2[2.7,4.4]厘米对3.6[2.5,4.6]厘米;p = 0.50)或CCF(0.89[0.82,0.90]对0.92[0.79,0.97];p = 0.31)无差异。转运前和转运期间符合指南建议的60秒CPR时段比例相当(速率:66%对57%[p = 0.22];深度:14%对19%[p = 0.39];CCF:80%对75%[p = 0.43])。

结论

院内患者转运期间小儿CPR质量得以维持,这表明ECPR系统纳入患者转运以促进ECMO插管是合理的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8036/7321865/9eafc133352e/nihms-1594901-f0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验