• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国青少年道路安全家庭气候量表的因子结构。

Factor structure of the family climate for road safety scale in emerging adults in the United States.

机构信息

Saint Louis University, United States.

Saint Louis University, United States.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Jul;142:105563. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105563. Epub 2020 May 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2020.105563
PMID:32422336
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7306423/
Abstract

The Family Climate for Road Safety Scale (FCRSS) was developed to measure parenting behaviors specific to the driving context. The original validation study found a scale structure composed of seven factors. However, this structure has not been consistently replicated. Two- and six-factor structures have also been identified. Further, this measure has not been validated in the U.S. and has not been subjected to measurement invariance testing to determine the factor structure's suitability across sex. Additionally, its ability to predict the driving style of emerging adults with varied driving experience has not been directly examined. The current study utilized exploratory and confirmatory factor analytic procedures to identify the factor structure of the FCRSS in a sample of emerging adults in the U.S. The sample consisted of 4392 students recruited from six universities. The sample was predominantly female (68.8 %), and was 83.5 % White, 6.1 % Black or African American, 5.1 % Asian American, 4.6 % biracial or multiracial, 0.4 % American Indian or Alaskan Native, and 0.2 % Pacific Islander or Hawaiian. Results indicated that a five-factor model of the FCRSS provided the best fit to the data compared to one-, two-, six-, and seven-factor models. The five factors identified for the model were: Noncommitment, Monitoring, Feedback, Communication, and Modeling. Further, invariance testing revealed that the five-factor model fit equally well for males and females. Some factors of the FCRSS predicted driving outcomes and driving styles in the expected directions. These findings have implications for family/parenting-based driving interventions for adolescents and young adults.

摘要

家庭道路安全氛围量表(FCRSS)旨在测量与驾驶相关的特定养育行为。最初的验证研究发现了一个由七个因素组成的量表结构。然而,这种结构并未得到一致的复制。也已经确定了两因素和六因素结构。此外,该测量方法尚未在美国得到验证,也没有进行测量不变性测试,以确定该因素结构在性别上的适用性。此外,它预测具有不同驾驶经验的新兴成年人驾驶风格的能力尚未直接检验。本研究在美国的一组新兴成年人中使用探索性和验证性因子分析程序来确定 FCRSS 的因子结构。该样本由六所大学招募的 4392 名学生组成。该样本主要为女性(68.8%),83.5%为白人,6.1%为黑人或非裔美国人,5.1%为亚裔美国人,4.6%为混血或多种族,0.4%为美洲印第安人或阿拉斯加原住民,0.2%为太平洋岛民或夏威夷原住民。结果表明,与单因素、双因素、六因素和七因素模型相比,FCRSS 的五因素模型为数据提供了最佳拟合。确定的模型有五个因素:不承诺、监控、反馈、沟通和模仿。此外,不变性测试表明,五因素模型对男性和女性的拟合程度相同。FCRSS 的一些因素以预期的方向预测了驾驶结果和驾驶风格。这些发现对青少年和年轻人的基于家庭/养育的驾驶干预措施具有意义。

相似文献

1
Factor structure of the family climate for road safety scale in emerging adults in the United States.美国青少年道路安全家庭气候量表的因子结构。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Jul;142:105563. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105563. Epub 2020 May 15.
2
Parenting in the context of driving: Spanish adaptation of the Family Climate for Road Safety (FCRSS) for parents and children.驾驶环境下的育儿:面向父母和儿童的道路安全家庭氛围量表(FCRSS)的西班牙语版。
Accid Anal Prev. 2023 Nov;192:107276. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107276. Epub 2023 Sep 2.
3
Parents' perceptions of the family climate for road safety.家长对道路安全家庭氛围的看法。
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Jan;74:157-61. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.10.023. Epub 2014 Nov 1.
4
Family climate for road safety: a new concept and measure.家庭道路安全氛围:新概念与新度量
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 May;54:1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.02.001. Epub 2013 Feb 9.
5
The contribution of family climate for road safety and social environment to the reported driving behavior of young drivers.家庭气候对道路安全和社会环境对年轻驾驶员报告驾驶行为的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2012 Jul;47:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.01.003. Epub 2012 Feb 8.
6
ADHD and dangerous driving in emerging adults: The moderating role of family climate for road safety.ADHD 与青年期危险驾驶行为:家庭道路安全氛围的调节作用。
Accid Anal Prev. 2022 Dec;178:106819. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2022.106819. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
7
A multidimensional intergenerational model of young males' driving styles.年轻男性驾驶风格的多维代际模型。
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Dec;97:141-145. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.09.004. Epub 2016 Sep 10.
8
Contributors to young drivers' driving styles - A comparison between Israel and Queensland.年轻驾驶员驾驶风格的影响因素——以以色列和昆士兰州为例。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Dec;109:47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.08.031. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
9
Associations between parenting styles and teen driving, safety-related behaviors and attitudes.养育方式与青少年驾驶、安全相关行为及态度之间的关联。
Pediatrics. 2009 Oct;124(4):1040-51. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-3037.
10
Confirmatory factor analysis of the Behaviour of Young Novice Drivers Scale (BYNDS).青少年新手驾驶员行为量表(BYNDS)的验证性因子分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2012 Nov;49:385-91. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.02.021. Epub 2012 Apr 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Parent and Teen Factors Associated with the Amount and Variety of Supervised Practice Driving.与监督下的练习驾驶量及种类相关的家长和青少年因素。
Saf Sci. 2019 Nov;119:214-218. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.08.019. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
2
Sluggish cognitive tempo in adults: Psychometric validation of the Adult Concentration Inventory.成人迟钝认知节奏:成人专注度问卷的心理测量学验证。
Psychol Assess. 2018 Mar;30(3):296-310. doi: 10.1037/pas0000476. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
3
Gender-Differentiated Parenting Revisited: Meta-Analysis Reveals Very Few Differences in Parental Control of Boys and Girls.再探性别差异化育儿:元分析显示,父母对男孩和女孩的控制差异极小。
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 14;11(7):e0159193. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159193. eCollection 2016.
4
Do as I say, not as I do: Distracted driving behavior of teens and their parents.照我说的做,别照我做的做:青少年及其父母的分心驾驶行为。
J Safety Res. 2015 Dec;55:21-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2015.07.007. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
5
The effect of family climate on risky driving of young novices: the moderating role of attitude and locus of control.
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Dec;73:53-64. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.08.005. Epub 2014 Aug 29.
6
The contribution of parents' driving behavior, family climate for road safety, and parent-targeted intervention to young male driving behavior.父母的驾驶行为、家庭道路安全氛围以及针对父母的干预措施对年轻男性驾驶行为的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Nov;72:296-301. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.07.010. Epub 2014 Aug 3.
7
Evaluating a model linking assessed parent factors to four domains of youth risky driving.评估一个将评估的父母因素与青年危险驾驶的四个领域联系起来的模型。
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Aug;69:40-50. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.08.028. Epub 2013 Sep 25.
8
Parent comments and instruction during the first four months of supervised driving: an opportunity missed?家长在监督驾驶的头四个月中的意见和指导:错失良机?
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Aug;69:15-22. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.02.015. Epub 2014 Mar 2.
9
The internal and external validity of sluggish cognitive tempo and its relation with DSM-IV ADHD.迟钝型认知节奏的内外部效度及其与 DSM-IV ADHD 的关系。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2014 Jan;42(1):21-35. doi: 10.1007/s10802-013-9800-6.
10
Family climate for road safety: a new concept and measure.家庭道路安全氛围:新概念与新度量
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 May;54:1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.02.001. Epub 2013 Feb 9.