Interactions of Perfluorooctanesulfonate and 6:2 Chlorinated Polyfluorinated Ether Sulfonate with Human Serum Albumin: A Comparative Study.

6:2 Chlorinated polyfluorinated ether sulfonate (6:2 Cl-PFESA) possesses a similar structure to perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) and is the third most important polyfluoroalkyl/perfluoroalkyl substance (PFAS) found in the general population of China. Studies have indicated that 6:2 Cl-PFESA exhibits a stronger bioaccumulative and toxicological potential than PFOS and is thus of considerable environmental concern. Here, the binding characteristics of PFOS and 6:2 Cl-PFESA to human serum albumin (HSA) were explored based on and methods. In the cell uptake assays, supplementation of HSA in the culture medium hindered diffusion of PFOS and 6:2 Cl-PFESA from the medium into cells. With the addition of 0.5, 10, and 200 μM HSA in the culture medium, the PFOS concentration in cells decreased by 21.4%, 78.1%, and 92.8%, whereas the 6:2 Cl-PFESA concentration in cells decreased by 28.4%, 84.4%, and 93.9%, respectively. Although no statistically significant difference between the reduction of PFOS and 6:2 Cl-PFESA was observed with 200 μM HSA in medium, the significant decrease in cellular 6:2 Cl-PFESA than PFOS after addition of 0.5 and 10 μM HSA implied that 6:2 Cl-PFESA had a stronger binding affinity than PFOS to HSA. Ultrafiltration centrifugation also suggested that 6:2 Cl-PFESA ( = 16.7 μM) had a higher affinity than PFOS ( = 30.7 μM) to HSA, though the binding molar ratios were similar, with 1 M HSA binding to 3-4 M PFOS/6:2 Cl-PFESA. Limited proteolysis further identified the core HSA peptides that bind to PFOS (peptide II, aa 189-457) and 6:2 Cl-PFESA (peptide I, aa 39-310). Using purified core peptides, 6:2 Cl-PFESA showed a stronger binding affinity than PFOS to both peptides I and II. The binding modes indicated that the chlorine and oxygen atoms in 6:2 Cl-PFESA were likely responsible for its preferential binding to Sudlow site I than to Trp214 or Sudlow site II, with the latter being the optimal binding site for PFOS. Overall, the stronger binding affinity of 6:2 Cl-PFESA to HSA may contribute to its higher bioaccumulation potential than PFOS.