• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多中心纵向混合方法研究方案,旨在探讨儿科重症监护后第一年儿童及其家庭的结局:OCEANIC 研究。

Study protocol for a multicentre longitudinal mixed methods study to explore the Outcomes of ChildrEn and fAmilies in the first year after paediatric Intensive Care: the OCEANIC study.

机构信息

Children and Young People Health Research, School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, UK

Nottingham Children's Hospital, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2020 May 17;10(5):e038974. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038974.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038974
PMID:
32423943
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7239532/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Annually in the UK, 20 000 children become very ill or injured and need specialist care within a paediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Most children survive. However, some children and their families may experience problems after they have left the PICU including physical, functional and/or emotional problems. It is unknown which children and families experience such problems, when these occur or what causes them. The aim of this mixed-method longitudinal cohort study is to understand the physical, functional, emotional and social impact of children surviving PICU (aged: 1 month-17 years), their parents and siblings, during the first year after a PICU admission.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A quantitative study involving 300 child survivors of PICU; 300 parents; and 150-300 siblings will collect data (using self-completion questionnaires) at baseline, PICU discharge, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post-PICU discharge. Questionnaires will comprise validated and reliable instruments. Demographic data, PICU admission and treatment data, health-related quality of life, functional status, strengths and difficulties behaviour and post-traumatic stress symptoms will be collected from the child. Parent and sibling data will be collected on the impact of paediatric health conditions on the family's functioning capabilities, levels of anxiety and social impact of the child's PICU admission. Data will be analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Concurrently, an embedded qualitative study involving semistructured interviews with 24 enrolled families at 3 months and 9 months post-PICU discharge will be undertaken. Framework analysis will be used to analyse the qualitative data.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study has received ethical approval from the National Health Services Research Ethics Committee (Ref: 19/WM/0290) and full governance clearance. This will be the first UK study to comprehensively investigate physical, functional, emotional and social consequences of PICU survival in the first-year postdischarge.Clinical Trials Registration Number: ISRCTN28072812 [Pre-results].

摘要

简介

在英国,每年有 20000 名儿童患重病或受伤,需要在儿科重症监护病房(PICU)接受专科护理。大多数儿童都能存活下来。然而,一些儿童及其家庭在离开 PICU 后可能会出现身体、功能和/或情感问题。目前尚不清楚哪些儿童和家庭会经历这些问题,这些问题何时出现,以及是什么导致了这些问题。本混合方法纵向队列研究旨在了解 PICU 存活儿童(年龄:1 个月至 17 岁)及其父母和兄弟姐妹在 PICU 入院后第一年的身体、功能、情感和社会影响。

方法和分析

一项涉及 300 名 PICU 存活儿童、300 名父母和 150-300 名兄弟姐妹的定量研究将在基线、PICU 出院时、出院后 1、3、6 和 12 个月收集数据(使用自我完成的问卷)。问卷将包括经过验证和可靠的工具。将从儿童收集人口统计学数据、PICU 入院和治疗数据、健康相关生活质量、功能状态、困难行为和创伤后应激症状。将从父母和兄弟姐妹收集有关儿科健康状况对家庭功能能力、焦虑水平和儿童 PICU 入院的社会影响的数据。将使用描述性和推断性统计分析数据。同时,将在 PICU 出院后 3 个月和 9 个月进行一项嵌入式定性研究,涉及 24 名入组家庭的半结构式访谈。将使用框架分析来分析定性数据。

伦理和传播

该研究已获得英国国民保健服务研究伦理委员会的伦理批准(编号:19/WM/0290)和全面治理批准。这将是英国第一项全面调查 PICU 存活儿童出院后第一年身体、功能、情感和社会后果的研究。临床试验注册号:ISRCTN28072812[预结果]。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3cc2/7239532/263ace38f3c2/bmjopen-2020-038974f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3cc2/7239532/d60b23f9715a/bmjopen-2020-038974f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3cc2/7239532/8f67191ca351/bmjopen-2020-038974f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3cc2/7239532/263ace38f3c2/bmjopen-2020-038974f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3cc2/7239532/d60b23f9715a/bmjopen-2020-038974f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3cc2/7239532/8f67191ca351/bmjopen-2020-038974f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3cc2/7239532/263ace38f3c2/bmjopen-2020-038974f03.jpg

相似文献

1
Study protocol for a multicentre longitudinal mixed methods study to explore the Outcomes of ChildrEn and fAmilies in the first year after paediatric Intensive Care: the OCEANIC study.多中心纵向混合方法研究方案,旨在探讨儿科重症监护后第一年儿童及其家庭的结局:OCEANIC 研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 May 17;10(5):e038974. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038974.
2
Protocol for a multicentre longitudinal mixed-methods study: feeding and survivorship outcomes in previously healthy young paediatric Intensive care survivors (the PIES Study).多中心纵向混合方法研究方案:先前健康的年轻儿科重症监护幸存者(PIES 研究)的喂养和生存结果。
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 3;10(12):e041234. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041234.
3
Post Intensive Care Syndrome in Swiss Paediatric survivors and their Families (PICSS-PF): a national, multicentre, longitudinal study protocol.瑞士儿科幸存者及其家庭的重症监护后综合征(PICSS-PF):一项全国性、多中心、纵向研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Nov 27;13(11):e076023. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076023.
4
Singapore's health outcomes after critical illness in kids: A study protocol exploring health outcomes of families 6 months after critical illness.新加坡儿童危重症后健康结局研究:一项探究危重症后 6 个月家庭健康结局的研究方案。
J Adv Nurs. 2021 Aug;77(8):3531-3541. doi: 10.1111/jan.14911. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
5
Parental emotional, social and transitional health in the first 6 months after childhood critical illness: A longitudinal qualitative study.儿童危重症后前6个月父母的情绪、社交及过渡性健康状况:一项纵向定性研究
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Feb;81(2):978-993. doi: 10.1111/jan.16288. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
6
Design and rationale of the Post-Intensive Care Syndrome - paediatrics (PICS-p) Longitudinal Cohort Study.《儿科重症监护后综合征(PICS-p)纵向队列研究的设计与原理》。
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 24;14(2):e084445. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084445.
7
Patient follow-up after discharge from the paediatric intensive care unit: A scoping review.儿科重症监护病房出院后患者的随访:一项范围综述。
Nurs Crit Care. 2025 May;30(3):e13187. doi: 10.1111/nicc.13187. Epub 2024 Oct 18.
8
Interventions to Support Psychological Health Outcomes for Children and Families Experiencing Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) Admission: A Scoping Review.支持入住儿科重症监护病房(PICU)的儿童及其家庭心理健康结果的干预措施:一项范围综述。
Nurs Crit Care. 2025 May;30(3):e70057. doi: 10.1111/nicc.70057.
9
Creating opportunities for parent empowerment: program effects on the mental health/coping outcomes of critically ill young children and their mothers.为家长赋权创造机会:该项目对危重症幼儿及其母亲心理健康/应对结果的影响。
Pediatrics. 2004 Jun;113(6):e597-607. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.6.e597.
10
Quality of life in children three and nine months after discharge from a paediatric intensive care unit: a prospective cohort study.儿科重症监护病房出院后三个月和九个月儿童的生活质量:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2008 Mar 11;6:21. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-6-21.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient follow-up after discharge from the paediatric intensive care unit: A scoping review.儿科重症监护病房出院后患者的随访:一项范围综述。
Nurs Crit Care. 2025 May;30(3):e13187. doi: 10.1111/nicc.13187. Epub 2024 Oct 18.
2
Design and rationale of the Post-Intensive Care Syndrome - paediatrics (PICS-p) Longitudinal Cohort Study.《儿科重症监护后综合征(PICS-p)纵向队列研究的设计与原理》。
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 24;14(2):e084445. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084445.
3
Implementing early rehabilitation and mobilisation for children in UK paediatric intensive care units: the PERMIT feasibility study.

本文引用的文献

1
Paediatric intensive care follow-up provision in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland.英国和爱尔兰的儿科重症监护随访服务。
Nurs Crit Care. 2021 Mar;26(2):128-134. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12510. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
2
Impact of Pediatric Critical Illness and Injury on Families: An Updated Systematic Review.儿科危重症和损伤对家庭的影响:一项更新的系统评价。
J Pediatr Nurs. 2020 Mar-Apr;51:21-31. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2019.10.013. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
3
Life after Critical Illness in Children-Toward an Understanding of Pediatric Post-intensive Care Syndrome.
在英国儿科重症监护病房实施儿童早期康复和活动:PERMIT 可行性研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2023 Nov;27(27):1-155. doi: 10.3310/HYRW5688.
4
Post Intensive Care Syndrome in Swiss Paediatric survivors and their Families (PICSS-PF): a national, multicentre, longitudinal study protocol.瑞士儿科幸存者及其家庭的重症监护后综合征(PICSS-PF):一项全国性、多中心、纵向研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Nov 27;13(11):e076023. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076023.
5
Patient, Caregiver, and Clinician Participation in Prioritization of Research Questions in Pediatric Hospital Medicine.患者、照护者和临床医生参与儿科医院医学研究问题的优先级排序。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Apr 1;5(4):e229085. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.9085.
6
Sources of Stress, Family Functioning, and Needs of Families With a Chronic Critically Ill Child: A Qualitative Study.患有慢性危重症儿童家庭的压力源、家庭功能及需求:一项定性研究。
Front Pediatr. 2021 Nov 4;9:740598. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.740598. eCollection 2021.
7
Transitions from short to long-term outcomes in pediatric critical care: considerations for clinical practice.儿科重症监护中从短期到长期结局的转变:临床实践考量
Transl Pediatr. 2021 Oct;10(10):2858-2874. doi: 10.21037/tp-21-61.
8
Demographic and Risk Factor Differences between Children with "One-Time" and "Repeat" Visits to the Emergency Department for Asthma.儿童因哮喘“单次”和“重复”就诊于急诊科的人口统计学和危险因素差异。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 9;18(2):486. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020486.
儿童危重症后的生活——迈向对儿科重症监护后综合征的理解
J Pediatr. 2018 Jul;198:16-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.12.084. Epub 2018 May 1.
4
Determinants of change in home participation among critically ill children.危重症患儿家庭参与度变化的决定因素。
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2018 Aug;60(8):793-800. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.13731. Epub 2018 Mar 25.
5
Conceptualizing Post Intensive Care Syndrome in Children-The PICS-p Framework.儿童重症监护后综合征的概念化- PICS-p 框架。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2018 Apr;19(4):298-300. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001476.
6
Stories of survival: Children's narratives of psychosocial well-being following paediatric critical illness or injury.生存故事:儿童关于儿科危重病或受伤后心理社会福祉的叙述
J Child Health Care. 2017 Sep;21(3):236-252. doi: 10.1177/1367493517717078. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
7
Research priorities by professional background - A detailed analysis of the James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership.按专业背景划分的研究重点——对詹姆斯·林德联盟优先事项设定合作项目的详细分析
J Intensive Care Soc. 2016 May;17(2):111-116. doi: 10.1177/1751143715609954. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
8
Survived so what? Identifying priorities for research with children and families post-paediatric intensive care unit.患儿从儿科重症监护病房出院后,他们和家庭的优先研究重点是什么?
Nurs Crit Care. 2018 Mar;23(2):68-74. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12298. Epub 2017 May 17.
9
Construct Validity and Responsiveness of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Generic Core Scales and Infant Scales in the PICU.儿科重症监护病房中儿童生活质量量表4.0通用核心量表和婴儿量表的结构效度与反应度
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2016 Jun;17(6):e272-9. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000727.
10
Functional Outcomes and Physical Impairments in Pediatric Critical Care Survivors: A Scoping Review.儿科重症监护幸存者的功能结局和身体损伤:一项范围综述
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2016 May;17(5):e247-59. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000706.